JB/055/229/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/055/229/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/055/229/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/055/229/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/055/229/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>1823 Dec 12<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Constitutional Code</head></p>
 
<p>14.  Counter-demand:  if and whether and if <del>any</del><lb/>
 
at the charge of the applicant any counter-demand has<lb/>
 
place on the part <add>in favour</add> of any and what proposed Defendant or Defendant's.</p>
<p>15.  If yes <add>so</add>, Evidence as per N<hi rend="superscript">os</hi> 9 and 10.<lb/>
In this case reluctance will be expected, as per<lb/>
N<hi rend="superscript">os</hi> 11, 13.</p>
<p>16.  Ablative state of things or event, if any, applicable<lb/>
to such counter-demand.  In this case <add>As to this matter</add> not reluctance<lb/>
but willingness will naturally be to be expected.</p>
<p>17.  In the following cases the Judge will see the propriety<lb/>
of dismissing the demand.</p>
<p>1.  If it appears not that any ordinance exists<lb/>
having in relation to the <add>extra-judicial</add> service demanded, in favour of<lb/>
a person situated as the <del>defe</del> applicant appears to be<lb/>
situated, the <del><gap/></del> effect of a collative ordinance.</p>
<p>2.  If, though admitting <del>the f</del> <add>that</add> same fact or facts has<lb/>
place what of the testimony <add>evidence</add> delivered by the applicant be to<lb/>
be believed have the effect of collative fact or facts, his<lb/>
demand is on the ground of fact sufficiently grounded<lb/>
yet neither <add>of itself</add> does the evidence delivered by <unclear>him</unclear> appear<lb/>
to afford a sufficient ground for calling upon the <add>any</add> proposed<lb/>
defendant to appear in the character <add>situation</add> of defendant, nor<lb/>
does it afford a sufficiently probable <add>prospective</add> indication of adequate<lb/>
evidence as likely to be receivable or extractible<lb/>
from any other source.</p>
<p>3.  Appropriate collative ordinance none assignable.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 03:02, 25 October 2024

Click Here To Edit

1823 Dec 12
Constitutional Code

14. Counter-demand: if and whether and if any
at the charge of the applicant any counter-demand has
place on the part in favour of any and what proposed Defendant or Defendant's.

15. If yes so, Evidence as per Nos 9 and 10.
In this case reluctance will be expected, as per
Nos 11, 13.

16. Ablative state of things or event, if any, applicable
to such counter-demand. In this case As to this matter not reluctance
but willingness will naturally be to be expected.

17. In the following cases the Judge will see the propriety
of dismissing the demand.

1. If it appears not that any ordinance exists
having in relation to the extra-judicial service demanded, in favour of
a person situated as the defe applicant appears to be
situated, the effect of a collative ordinance.

2. If, though admitting the f that same fact or facts has
place what of the testimony evidence delivered by the applicant be to
be believed have the effect of collative fact or facts, his
demand is on the ground of fact sufficiently grounded
yet neither of itself does the evidence delivered by him appear
to afford a sufficient ground for calling upon the any proposed
defendant to appear in the character situation of defendant, nor
does it afford a sufficiently probable prospective indication of adequate
evidence as likely to be receivable or extractible
from any other source.

3. Appropriate collative ordinance none assignable.


Identifier: | JB/055/229/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 55.

Date_1

1823-12-12

Marginal Summary Numbering

[[marginal_summary_numbering::[unnumbered], 3]]

Box

055

Main Headings

Constitutional Code; Procedure Code

Folio number

229

Info in main headings field

Constitutional Code

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

E3

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

George Bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

17950

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in