JB/055/273/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/055/273/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto upload
 
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/055/273/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/055/273/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<p>(2)<lb/>
A case in which hearings in unlimited number<lb/>
may require to be given to an applicant before a determination<lb/>
is taken whether to constitute <add>place</add> any and what individual in the <add>on the<lb/>
Defendant's side</add> situation of Defendant is that in which the
</p>


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''


<p>1825. Nov. 19<lb/>
<head>Procedure Code</head><note>Ch. 1.  Stages of Procedure<lb/>
&sect;. 2.  Initiatory application</note></p>
<p>(1)<lb/>
An applicant is at liberty to bring with him any<lb/>
number of persons in any number in the character of <del>applic</del><lb/>
co-applicants or witnesses.  But then will all of them be exposed <add>subjectible</add><lb/>
to counter interrogation <del>to</del> on the Defendant's side.</p>
<p>(3)<lb/>
Employed this under III <unclear>Appellate</unclear><lb/>
Whereas by accident or design when <del>a <gap/></del> <add>after the</add><lb/>
at the stage in question a certain Judge has had a hearing<lb/>
of the suit in question, a different Judge has a <unclear>second</unclear> hearing<lb/>
of it, this may eventually have the effect of appeal<lb/>
and this forms another stage.  But this is no <del><gap/></del> more<lb/>
than of necessity is liable to happen under any system of<lb/>
procedure, and the place being the same the vexation of a<lb/>
second hearing <del>for</del> <add>before</add> a different Judge will not be greater than<lb/>
if it were before the same Judge.</p>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 08:50, 30 October 2024

Click Here To Edit

(2)
A case in which hearings in unlimited number
may require to be given to an applicant before a determination
is taken whether to constitute place any and what individual in the on the
Defendant's side
situation of Defendant is that in which the


1825. Nov. 19
Procedure CodeCh. 1. Stages of Procedure
§. 2. Initiatory application

(1)
An applicant is at liberty to bring with him any
number of persons in any number in the character of applic
co-applicants or witnesses. But then will all of them be exposed subjectible
to counter interrogation to on the Defendant's side.

(3)
Employed this under III Appellate
Whereas by accident or design when a after the
at the stage in question a certain Judge has had a hearing
of the suit in question, a different Judge has a second hearing
of it, this may eventually have the effect of appeal
and this forms another stage. But this is no more
than of necessity is liable to happen under any system of
procedure, and the place being the same the vexation of a
second hearing for before a different Judge will not be greater than
if it were before the same Judge.



Identifier: | JB/055/273/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 55.

Date_1

1824-11-19

Marginal Summary Numbering

5-6

Box

055

Main Headings

Constitutional Code; Procedure Code

Folio number

273

Info in main headings field

Procedure Code

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

D3 / E2

Penner

Watermarks

J WHATMAN TURKEY MILL 1824

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Jonathan Blenman

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1824

Notes public

ID Number

17994

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in