★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<head>PERJURY. Division of.</head> | <head>PERJURY. Division of.</head> | ||
<p>Perjury being nothing but the asserting with certain solemnities<lb/>of that which to the speaker is <del>known</del> <add>being false is also is believed to be so</add>not to<lb/><del>is divisible</del> of <unclear>text </unclear> by the speaker<lb/> <add>we must <unclear>seek</unclear><add><del>be true</del> by the speaker</add></add><lb/>in the different purposes for which there can be a <add>men can have</add><lb/><add>service to make it with <unclear>them</unclear></add> <del>motive and means to <sic>committ</sic></del> a <gap/> to make it with these <sic>solemnities</sic>, & the motive<lb/>to make it falsely. </p> Perjury is <add>may be</add> 1<hi rend='superscript'>st</hi> <unclear><foreign>Causa propria</foreign></unclear>. 2<hi rend='superscript'>d</hi> <foreign><unclear>Causa aliena</unclear></foreign><p>2. <del>Both</del> <add>It</add> may be 1<hi rend='superscript'>st</hi> Litigatory <add>Contentious</add>. 2<hi rend='superscript'>d</hi> Extra-litigatory <add>Uncontentious</add></p><p>3. It may be <add><unclear>wherein</unclear> <foreign><add>causa</add> propria</foreign></add> 1<hi rend='superscript'>st</hi> Lucrative. 2<hi rend='superscript'>d</hi> <unclear>Evasive</unclear>.</p><p>4. It may be 1<hi rend='superscript'>st</hi> In <del><gap/></del> <add><foreign>civilibus</foreign></add> 2<hi rend='superscript'>d</hi> In <foreign>Criminalibus</foreign> </p><p>5. <foreign>In Criminalibus</foreign> it may be 1<hi rend='superscript'>st</hi> Accusative. 2<hi rend='superscript'>d</hi> Exculpative.</p><p>This is not <add>to be regarded as</add> mere logical wire-drawing since <lb/> there are none of <add>all</add> these differences there is never <lb/> one that has not <add>such</add> a real <add>correspondent</add> difference in the <lb/> nature of the crime, as often to indicate the <lb/> expediency of a different in point of treatment.</p> 4. It may be 1<hi rend='superscript'>st</hi> In <del><gap/></del> <add><foreign>civilibus</foreign></add> 2<hi rend='superscript'>d</hi> In <foreign>Criminalibus</foreign> 5. <foreign>In Criminalibus</foreign> it may be 1<hi rend='superscript'>st</hi> Accusative. 2<hi rend='superscript'>d</hi> Exculpative.</p> | |||
<p>This is not <add>to be regarded as</add> mere logical wire-drawing since <lb/> | |||
there are none of <add>all</add> these differences there is never <lb/> one that has not <add>such</add> a real <add>correspondent</add> difference in the | |||
<lb/> nature of the crime, as often to indicate the | |||
<lb/> expediency of a different in point of treatment.</p> | |||
4. It may be 1<hi rend='superscript'>st</hi> In <del><gap/></del> <add><foreign>civilibus</foreign></add> 2<hi rend='superscript'>d</hi> In <foreign>Criminalibus</foreign> | |||
5. <foreign>In Criminalibus</foreign> it may be 1<hi rend='superscript'>st</hi> Accusative. 2<hi rend='superscript'>d</hi> Exculpative. | |||
</p> | |||
<p>This is not <add>to be regarded as</add> mere logical wire-drawing since | |||
<lb/> | |||
there are none of <add>all</add> these differences there is never | |||
<lb/> | |||
one that has not <add>such</add> a real <add>correspondent</add> difference in the | |||
<lb/> | |||
nature of the crime, as often to indicate the | |||
<lb/> | |||
expediency of a different in point of treatment.</p> | |||
https://transcribe-bentham.ucl.ac.uk/index.php?title=JB/073/012/001&action=edit PERJURY. Division of.
Perjury being nothing but the asserting with certain solemnities
of that which to the speaker is known being false is also is believed to be sonot to
is divisible of text by the speaker
we must seek<add>be true by the speaker</add>
in the different purposes for which there can be a men can have
service to make it with them motive and means to committ a to make it with these solemnities, & the motive
to make it falsely.
Perjury is may be 1st Causa propria. 2d Causa aliena
2. Both It may be 1st Litigatory Contentious. 2d Extra-litigatory Uncontentious
3. It may be wherein <foreign><add>causa propria</foreign></add> 1st Lucrative. 2d Evasive.
4. It may be 1st In civilibus 2d In Criminalibus
5. In Criminalibus it may be 1st Accusative. 2d Exculpative.
This is not to be regarded as mere logical wire-drawing since
there are none of all these differences there is never
one that has not such a real correspondent difference in the
nature of the crime, as often to indicate the
expediency of a different in point of treatment.
4. It may be 1st In civilibus 2d In Criminalibus 5. In Criminalibus it may be 1st Accusative. 2d Exculpative.
This is not to be regarded as mere logical wire-drawing since
there are none of all these differences there is never
one that has not such a real correspondent difference in the
nature of the crime, as often to indicate the
expediency of a different in point of treatment.
|
Identifier: | JB/073/012/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 73. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
073 |
law in general |
||
|
012 |
perjury division of |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
|||
|
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::[lion with vryheyt motif]]] |
||
|
23852 |
|||
