★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<head>PERJURY. Division of.</head> | <head>PERJURY. Division of.</head> | ||
<p>Perjury being nothing but the asserting with certain <sic>columnities</sic><lb/>of that which | <p>Perjury being nothing but the asserting with certain <sic>columnities</sic><lb/>of that which <add>being false is also is believed to be so</add> to the asserter is <del>known</del> not to<lb/><del>is divisible</del> of by the asserter<lb/> in the different purposes for which there can be a <add>men can have</add><lb/><add>occasion to make it with these</add> <del>motive and means to <sic>committ</sic></del> <sic>columnities</sic>, & the motive<lb/>to make it falsely. </p> Perjury <del>is</del> <add>may be</add> 1<hi rend='superscript'>st</hi> Litigatory <add>Contentious</add>. 2<hi rend='superscript'>d Extra-litigatory <add>Uncontentious</add> </hi> <p>3. It may be <add>wherein <foreign><add>causa</add><add> propria</add> 1<hi rend='superscript'>st</hi> Lucrative. 2<hi rend='superscript'>d</hi> <gap/>.</p> <p>4. It may be 1<hi rend='superscript'>st</hi> In <del><gap/></del> <add><foreign>civilibus</foreign></add> 2<hi rend='superscript'>d</hi> In <foreign>Criminalibus</foreign> </p><p>5. <foreign>In Criminalibus</foreign> it may be 1<hi rend='superscript'>st</hi> Accusative. 2<hi rend='superscript'>d</hi> Exculpative. | ||
This is not <add>to be regarded as</add> mere logical wire-drawing since <lb/> there are none of <add>all</add> these differences there is never <lb/> one that has not <add>such</add> a real <add>correspondent</add> difference in the<lb/>nature of the crime, as often to indicate the <lb/>expediency of a difference in point of treatment.<pb/> | This is not <add>to be regarded as</add> mere logical wire-drawing since <lb/> there are none of <add>all</add> these differences there is never <lb/> one that has not <add>such</add> a real <add>correspondent</add> difference in the<lb/>nature of the crime, as often to indicate the <lb/>expediency of a difference in point of treatment.<pb/> | ||
https://transcribe-bentham.ucl.ac.uk/index.php?title=JB/073/012/001&action=edit PERJURY. Division of.
Perjury being nothing but the asserting with certain columnities
of that which being false is also is believed to be so to the asserter is known not to
is divisible of by the asserter
in the different purposes for which there can be a men can have
occasion to make it with these motive and means to committ columnities, & the motive
to make it falsely.
Perjury is may be 1st Litigatory Contentious. 2d Extra-litigatory Uncontentious
3. It may be wherein <foreign><add>causa propria 1st Lucrative. 2d .
4. It may be 1st In civilibus 2d In Criminalibus
5. In Criminalibus it may be 1st Accusative. 2d Exculpative.
This is not to be regarded as mere logical wire-drawing since
there are none of all these differences there is never
one that has not such a real correspondent difference in the
nature of the crime, as often to indicate the
expediency of a difference in point of treatment.
---page break---
|
Identifier: | JB/073/012/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 73. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
073 |
law in general |
||
|
012 |
perjury division of |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
|||
|
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::[lion with vryheyt motif]]] |
||
|
23852 |
|||
