JB/055/179/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/055/179/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/055/179/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/055/179/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<p>1824 Nov<lb/>
 
<head>Procedure Code</head><note>Ch. Initiating application</note></p>
<head>1824 Nov<lb/>Procedure Code</head> <p><note><sic>Ch.</sic> Initiating application<lb/>&sect;</note></p> <p><note>4<lb/><sic>Art.</sic> 4. Answer. No.<lb/>This would but ensure the<lb/>vexation, <del><gap/></del> <add>more</add> than double<lb/>the <sic>expence</sic>, and <gap/><lb/>for its effect, to a great<lb/>majority of the people;<lb/><add>as at present</add> a denial of justice.</note></p> <p><note>1. As to <hi rend="underline">time</hi>:
<p>For the Attorney there is but that one paymaster:  and the<lb/>
the time<lb/>of two men would be occupied<lb/>instead of one: <del>of</del><b/>the Judge's and the <del>Attorney</del> <add>Lawyer's</add> instead of the Judge's alone</note></p> <p>For the Attorney there is but that one paymaster:  and the<lb/>poorer he is, the heavier is the <sic>burthen</sic> which <del>a per</del> the<lb/>payment of a given sum imposes on him.  For a given<lb/>quantity of time &#x2014; say a twelvemonths time a much less<lb/>remuneration in a pecuniary shape will suffice in the<lb/>case of the Judge than in the case of the Attorney: the<lb/>Judge being, no one can say in how large a proportion<lb/>before trial, paid in time and in natural <add>dignity</add> respect:  the<lb/>
poorer he is, the heavier is the burthen which <del>a per</del> the<lb/>
Attorney being <del><gap/> <gap/></del> naturally an <add>the</add> object of <del>the</del> a <gap/><lb/>man of a different not to say opposite nature must<lb/>
payment of a given sum imposes on him.  For a given<lb/>
be <del><gap/></del> paid to the full in money, and with somewhat<lb/>in addition to make up for <del>what he</del> whatever his<lb/>suffering may be in that shape.</p> <p><note>5<lb/><sic>art.</sic> 5. 2. As to <sic>expence</sic>, in<lb/>the character of lawyers<lb/>a man would <del>requi</del> <add>have</add><lb/>greater payment than in<lb/>that of  a Judge, or the<lb/><gap/> <gap/> <gap/></del> <add>profession would not be<lb/>stocked</add> <del>profession.</del>: the Judge is<lb/>partly held in <gap/><lb/>respect: the Lawyer, <gap/><lb/>in <gap/><lb/>profession, must <del>be paid</del> <gap/>,lb/>money in compensation for <lb/><hi rend="underline"><gap/></hi></note></p>  <p>In France, fifty pounds a year without fees is a<lb/>salary for a Judge:  and for that price <del><gap/></del> Judges serve<lb/>there by hundreds and that without murmurs <add>or reproach<hi rend="superscript">✝︎</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">✝︎</hi>&#9758; <note>Search Bonaparte's Code Codes to be <gap/> there are as far</note></add> on their<lb/>part or suspicion of improbity on the part of the public.</p> <p><note>6<lb/><sic>art.</sic> 6. By interest <del>having the</del><lb/><add>in so far as he has the</add> power, the Lawyer will be<lb/>led to add, to the <gap/><lb/><del>of time</del> necessary time<lb/>in excess, that profit may<lb/>be proportionable.</note></p> <p>The Attorney would have <add>has</add> an interest in protracting the conversation,<lb/>and in adjourning it from day to day. The Judge has<lb/>no such interest:  the interest he has <del>is in power</del> <add>would lead not to delay but</add> to precipitation.<lb/>But <del>to d</del> power has probity from <unclear>failure</unclear> on that side, <add>the checks that have <del>been <gap/>, and in particular<lb/>of the surrounding audience</del></add> in his own eyes.</p> <p><note>7<lb/><sic>Art.</sic> 7.
quantity of time say a twelvemonths time a much less<lb/>
The Judge has no<lb/>interest in such delay:<lb/>his interest tends to precipitation:<lb/>but <del>to this</del><lb/>against this the <gap/> provided<lb/>will be sufficient</note></p> <p>The difficulty must therefore be either <unclear>overcome</unclear> or<lb/>doubled.</p> <p><note>8<lb/><sic>Art.</sic> 8 In France, Judges<lb/>in <del><gap/></del> <add>great</add. number, serve<lb/>for £50 a year each and<lb/>without reparation. <add>In Bonaparte's Code.</add> No man<lb/>then would, by the expectation<lb/>of so small a remuneration,<lb/><add>be be led to</add> commence lawyer <hi rend="superscript">(a)</hi></note></p> <p><del>Make a law that</del> No person shall <add>to</add> approach the Judge<lb/>
remuneration in a pecuniary shape will suffice in the<lb/>
without bringing with him an Attorney?  When you have made<lb/>a law for this make another, <del>he</del>saying that no person<lb/>without bringing with him an Apothecary, no man shall repair <add>approach</add><lb/>
case of the Judge than in the case of the Attorney: the<lb/>
to a Physician.</p> <p>Note <hi rend="superscript">(a)</hi><lb/><del>[+] Art. 9.</del> Where sympathy for thinking boys was a factor, and<lb/>ingenuity was at work for <foreign>succedaneums,</foreign> one person proposed<lb/>a <gap/> <del>for a substitute</del> with ropes to raise and lower it. Sympathy<lb/>still objecting, "Well then was the answer": "if you object to a <gap/><lb/>like a couple of <gap/> <hi rend="superscript">[+]</hi><lb/><!-- from the left hand edge of the page --><hi rend="superscript">[+]</hi> with him a danger, no person should be allowed to apply to a Physician, without bringing with him an Apothecary.<p/> <p><note>9<lb/><sic>Art.</sic>9. If no person should apply<lb/>to a Judge without bringing <!-- from the left hand edge of the page --><hi rend="superscript">[+]</hi> with him a danger, no person should be allowed to apply to a Physician, without bringing with him an Apothecary.</p><!-- continues along the right hand edge of the page -->The suffering would <del>be</del> instead be doubled:  but the sufferers would be of less account in the hour-keepers books.</p>
Judge being, no one can say in how large a proportion<lb/>
 
before trial, paid on time and in natural <add>dignity</add> respect:  the<lb/>
<p>&#9758; Go to the last paragraph in the text.<hi rend="superscript">⊞1</hi>  
Attorney being <del><gap/></del> naturally an <add>the</add> object of <del>the</del> a <gap/><lb/>
of a different not to say opposite nature must<lb/>
be <del><gap/></del> paid to the full in money, and with somewhat<lb/>
in addition to make up for <del>what he</del> whatever his<lb/>
suffering may be in that shape.</p>
<p>In France, fifty pounds a year without fees is a<lb/>
salary for a Judge:  and for that price <del><gap/></del> Judges serve<lb/>
there by hundreds and that without <unclear>murmurs</unclear> <add>or reproach<hi rend="superscript">✝︎</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">✝︎</hi>&#9758; Search Bonapartes Code Codes to be <gap/> there are as far</note></add> on their<lb/>
part or suspicion of improbity on the part of the public.</p>
<p>The Attorney would have <add>has</add> an interest in <gap/> the conversation,<lb/>
and in adjourning it from day to day. The Judge has<lb/>
no such interest:  the interest he has <del>is a <gap/></del> <add>would lead not to delay but</add> to precipitation.<lb/>
But <del><gap/> <gap/></del> <gap/> his probity from <unclear>failure</unclear> on that side, <add>the checks that have </add> in his own eyes.</p>
<p>The difficulty must therefore be either <unclear>overcome</unclear> or<lb/>
doubled.</p>
<p><del>Make a law that</del> No person shall <add>to</add> approach the Judge<lb/>
without bringing with him an Attorney?  When you have made<lb/>
a law for this make another, <del><gap/></del> saying that no person<lb/>
without bringing with him an Apothecary, no man shall repair <add>approach</add><lb/>
to a Physician.</p>
<p>Note (a)<lb/>
<del>Art. 9.</del> Where sympathy for thinking boys were <del><gap/></del> <gap/>, and<lb/>
ingenuity was at work for succedaneums,  one person proposed<lb/>
a <gap/> <del>for a substitute</del> with ropes to raise and lower it.   <unclear>Sympathy</unclear><lb/>
still objecting, "Hell thus was the answer": if you object to a <gap/><lb/>
<gap/> a concept of checked<hi rend="superscript"></hi><lb/>
<hi rend="superscript"></hi> with time a danger, no person should be allowed to apply to a Physician, without bringing with him an Apothecary.<p/>
<p>&#9758; Go to the last paragraph in the text.<hi rend="superscript">⊞1</hi> The suffering would <del>be</del> instead be doubled:  but the sufferers would be of less account in the hour-keepers books.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 10:49, 5 December 2024

Click Here To Edit

1824 Nov
Procedure Code

Ch. Initiating application
§

4
Art. 4. Answer. No.
This would but ensure the
vexation, more than double
the expence, and
for its effect, to a great
majority of the people;
as at present a denial of justice.

1. As to time: the time
of two men would be occupied
instead of one: ofthe Judge's and the Attorney Lawyer's instead of the Judge's alone

For the Attorney there is but that one paymaster: and the
poorer he is, the heavier is the burthen which a per the
payment of a given sum imposes on him. For a given
quantity of time — say a twelvemonths time a much less
remuneration in a pecuniary shape will suffice in the
case of the Judge than in the case of the Attorney: the
Judge being, no one can say in how large a proportion
before trial, paid in time and in natural dignity respect: the

Attorney being naturally an the object of the a
man of a different not to say opposite nature must

be paid to the full in money, and with somewhat
in addition to make up for what he whatever his
suffering may be in that shape.

5
art. 5. 2. As to expence, in
the character of lawyers
a man would requi have
greater payment than in
that of a Judge, or the
profession would not be
stocked
profession.: the Judge is
partly held in
respect: the Lawyer,
in
profession, must be paid ,lb/>money in compensation for

In France, fifty pounds a year without fees is a
salary for a Judge: and for that price Judges serve
there by hundreds and that without murmurs or reproach✝︎ ✝︎☞ <note>Search Bonaparte's Code Codes to be there are as far on their
part or suspicion of improbity on the part of the public.

6
art. 6. By interest having the
in so far as he has the power, the Lawyer will be
led to add, to the
of time necessary time
in excess, that profit may
be proportionable.

The Attorney would have has an interest in protracting the conversation,
and in adjourning it from day to day. The Judge has
no such interest: the interest he has is in power would lead not to delay but to precipitation.
But to d power has probity from failure on that side, the checks that have been , and in particular
of the surrounding audience
in his own eyes.

7
Art. 7. The Judge has no
interest in such delay:
his interest tends to precipitation:
but to this
against this the provided
will be sufficient

The difficulty must therefore be either overcome or
doubled.

8
Art. 8 In France, Judges
in great</add. number, serve
for £50 a year each and
without reparation. <add>In Bonaparte's Code.
No man
then would, by the expectation
of so small a remuneration,
be be led to commence lawyer (a)

Make a law that No person shall to approach the Judge

without bringing with him an Attorney? When you have made
a law for this make another, hesaying that no person
without bringing with him an Apothecary, no man shall repair approach

to a Physician.

Note (a)
[+] Art. 9. Where sympathy for thinking boys was a factor, and
ingenuity was at work for succedaneums, one person proposed
a for a substitute with ropes to raise and lower it. Sympathy
still objecting, "Well then was the answer": "if you object to a
like a couple of [+]
[+] with him a danger, no person should be allowed to apply to a Physician, without bringing with him an Apothecary.

<note>9
Art.9. If no person should apply
to a Judge without bringing [+] with him a danger, no person should be allowed to apply to a Physician, without bringing with him an Apothecary.

The suffering would be instead be doubled: but the sufferers would be of less account in the hour-keepers books.

☞ Go to the last paragraph in the text.⊞1

Identifier: | JB/055/179/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 55.

Date_1

1824-11

Marginal Summary Numbering

4-9

Box

055

Main Headings

Constitutional Code; Procedure Code

Folio number

179

Info in main headings field

Procedure Code

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

C2 / D2 / E2

Penner

Watermarks

J WHATMAN TURKEY MILL 1824

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Jonathan Blenman

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1824

Notes public

ID Number

17900

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in