JB/055/315/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/055/315/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head>Procedure Code<lb/>1826. <del>April</del> May 3<lb/><add>From</add> Constitutional Code</head> <p><note><add>Procedure Code<lb/><sic>Ch.</sic> IX Ministers collectively<lb/>&sect;.6. Statute function</note></p> <p><gap/> as to <add><gap/></add> trustworthiness &#x2014; by <hi rend="underline">rumours</hi></p> <p>&#9758; Employed this next <gap/> in Constitutional Code <sic>Ch. IX. &sect;. <unclear>Statiste</unclear></p> <p><note><sic>Art</sic> or 5. Transcribe <add>or 5. Instrumental</add><lb/>text</note></p> <p><sic>Art.</sic> or 5 <add>With a solicitude proportioned to the importance of the occasion</add><lb/> On receipt of the information <del><gap/> through<lb/>which so ever channel <add>which so ever form</add> received oral or epistolary</del> <add>at the office</add> it will be the<lb/>endeavour of the directing functionaries to <gap/> <del>the evidence</del> <add>it</add> up to<lb/>its source that it is to <del><gap/></del> <Add>trace <del>the</del> each <sic>alledged</sic> fact</add> up to the person <add>or persons</add> who in relation <del>to the</del><lb/><add>thereto <del><gap/> be</del> are <del><sic>alledged</sic> to have been <sic>alledged</sic> percipient or <sic>alledged</sic></del> stated as having by means of any one or more of the <gap/> <gap/>.</add><lb/><del>occurrence in question have been <sic>alledged</sic> percipient or <sic>alledged</sic><lb/><add>been</add> percipient witnesses.</P. <p>For the need of making this investigation see <sic>Ch.<sic> VI <hi rend="underline">Legislative</hi><lb/>&sect;.27. <hi rend="underline">Legislative Enquiry Judicatory</hi>.</p> <p>Instructional</p> <!-- next three paragraphs crossed though in ink --> <p><note><hi rend="underline">Instructional</hi><lb/><sic>art.</sic> 6. <add>(or) or 6.</add> Of a statement<lb/><del>relative to an occasion</del> <add>if made by other than a<lb/>percipient witness</add> the trustworthiness will<lb/>be diminished by</del> every<lb/>degree in the <hi rend="underline">chain</hi> of<lb/the evidence.</note></p>  
<head>Procedure Code<lb/>1826. <del>April</del> May 3<lb/><add>From</add> Constitutional Code</head> <p><note><add>Procedure Code</add><lb/><sic>Ch.</sic> IX Ministers collectively<lb/>&sect;.6. Statute function</note></p> <p><gap/> as to <add><gap/></add> trustworthiness &#x2014; by <hi rend="underline">rumours</hi></p> <p>&#9758; Employed this next <gap/> in Constitutional Code <sic>Ch.</sic> IX. &sect;. <unclear>Statiste</unclear></p> <p><note><sic>Art</sic> or 5. Transcribe <add>or 5. Instrumental</add><lb/>text</note></p> <p><sic>Art.</sic> or 5 <add>With a solicitude proportioned to the importance of the occasion</add><lb/> On receipt of the information <del><gap/> through<lb/>which so ever channel <add>which so ever form</add> received oral or epistolary</del> <add>at the office</add> it will be the<lb/>endeavour of the directing functionaries to <gap/> <del>the evidence</del> <add>it</add> up to<lb/>its source that it is to <del><gap/></del> <add>trace <del>the</del> each <sic>alledged</sic> fact</add> up to the person <add>or persons</add> who in relation <del>to the</del><lb/><add>thereto <del><gap/> be</del> are <del><sic>alledged</sic> to have been <sic>alledged</sic> percipient or <sic>alledged</sic></del> stated as having by means of any one or more of the <gap/> <gap/>.</add><lb/><del>occurrence in question have been <sic>alledged</sic> percipient or <sic>alledged</sic></del><lb/><add>been</add> percipient witnesses.</p> <p>For the need of making this investigation see <sic>Ch.</sic> VI <hi rend="underline">Legislative</hi><lb/>&sect;.27. <hi rend="underline">Legislative Enquiry Judicatory</hi>.</p> <p>Instructional</p> <!-- next three paragraphs crossed though in ink --> <p><note><hi rend="underline">Instructional</hi><lb/><sic>Art.</sic> 6. <add>(or) or 6.</add> Of a statement<lb/><del>relative to an occasion</del> <add>if made by other than a<lb/>percipient witness</add> the trustworthiness will<lb/>be diminished by every<lb/>degree in the <hi rend="underline">chain</hi> of<lb/>the evidence.</note></p> <p><sic>Art</sic> The degree of trustworthiness being supposed<lb/>to be the same in all, and in every one unexceptionable <add>unobjectionable</add><lb/>the probative force <del>will be</del> <add>and trustworthiness</add> of <gap/> article of information <add>evidence</add><lb/>will be <del>inversely</del> <add>diminished</add> by every reporting witness <add><del>of the same <gap/> or say good</del></add> interposed<lb/>between the <del><gap/> of the evidence</del> person by whom the evidence <add>information</add><lb/>is directed, and the <sic>alledged</sic> percipient witness that is to<lb/>say the person to whose senses the <sic>alledged</sic> matter of fact in<lb/>question is <sic>alledged</sic> to have at the time and place in question<lb/>presented itself.</p> <p><note><hi rend="underline">Exposition</hi><lb/>7<lb/><sic>Art.</sic> or 7 <del>if according to the</del> <add>If what the informant</add><lb/><del>statement made by the <gap/><lb/>informant, be the informant</del><lb/><add>says is &#x2014; that</add>heard to say that he<lb/>heard P. the <sic>alledged</sic><lb/>percipient witness say<lb/><that he saw so and so<lb/>than is <del>the</del> <add>an</add> <sic>alledged</sic><lb/>reporting or say relating<lb/>witness of the first grade<lb/>or say <gap/>, to wit<lb/>from the source: if <del>it be<lb/>that</del> what the informant<lb/>says so that he (A) heard<lb/>B say that he (B) heard<lb/>the <sic>alledged</sic> percipient<lb/>witness say that he saw<lb/>so and so, the is <del><gap/></del><lb?>B. a reporting witness of<lb/>the first grade, A a reporting<lb/>witness of the second<lb/>grade, and so on.</note></p> <p><sic>Art.</sic> By law a mere <sic>alledged</sic> reporting witnesses<lb/>of the same <gap/> a grade understand those <add>by</add> whom<lb/><del><gap/></del> the same report has been heard from <add><gap/> <gap/></add> the same individual<lb/>with in an immediate way without the <gap/><lb/>of any other reporting witness.</p>  





Revision as of 16:48, 19 December 2024

Click Here To Edit

Procedure Code
1826. April May 3
From Constitutional Code

Procedure Code
Ch. IX Ministers collectively
§.6. Statute function

as to trustworthiness — by rumours

☞ Employed this next in Constitutional Code Ch. IX. §. Statiste

Art or 5. Transcribe or 5. Instrumental
text

Art. or 5 With a solicitude proportioned to the importance of the occasion
On receipt of the information through
which so ever channel which so ever form received oral or epistolary
at the office it will be the
endeavour of the directing functionaries to the evidence it up to
its source that it is to trace the each alledged fact up to the person or persons who in relation to the
thereto be are alledged to have been alledged percipient or alledged stated as having by means of any one or more of the .
occurrence in question have been alledged percipient or alledged
been percipient witnesses.

For the need of making this investigation see Ch. VI Legislative
§.27. Legislative Enquiry Judicatory.

Instructional

Instructional
Art. 6. (or) or 6. Of a statement
relative to an occasion if made by other than a
percipient witness
the trustworthiness will
be diminished by every
degree in the chain of
the evidence.

Art The degree of trustworthiness being supposed
to be the same in all, and in every one unexceptionable unobjectionable
the probative force will be and trustworthiness of article of information evidence
will be inversely diminished by every reporting witness of the same or say good interposed
between the of the evidence person by whom the evidence information
is directed, and the alledged percipient witness that is to
say the person to whose senses the alledged matter of fact in
question is alledged to have at the time and place in question
presented itself.

Exposition
7
Art. or 7 if according to the If what the informant
statement made by the
informant, be the informant

says is — thatheard to say that he
heard P. the alledged
percipient witness say
<that he saw so and so
than is the an alledged
reporting or say relating
witness of the first grade
or say , to wit
from the source: if it be
that
what the informant
says so that he (A) heard
B say that he (B) heard
the alledged percipient
witness say that he saw
so and so, the is <lb?>B. a reporting witness of
the first grade, A a reporting
witness of the second
grade, and so on.

Art. By law a mere alledged reporting witnesses
of the same a grade understand those by whom
the same report has been heard from the same individual
with in an immediate way without the
of any other reporting witness.




Identifier: | JB/055/315/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 55.

Date_1

1826-05-03

Marginal Summary Numbering

or 5 - or 6, 7, or 9

Box

055

Main Headings

Constitutional Code; Procedure Code

Folio number

315

Info in main headings field

Procedure Code from Constitutional Code

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

D44 / E15

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

18036

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in