JB/064/075/001

Click Here To Edit

G.B. 1825. Septr. 5. Seen 1828. Jan. 3.
Penal Code☞ Consult for Duelling Extinguished
Ch. III. Offences affecting person &c.
§. 3. Challenging.
1. Efficiency of this.
2. Existg Syst. not.

1.
Efficiency of means of
repression
1. As to would be Challenger.
2. As to Challengees.

2. I. Challenger.
1. As to would be challenger.
Efficiency in the case
of every class of challengers.

3. Challenger Fine
1. Efficiency of fines imposed
1. On challenger.
2. On acceptance.
3. As compensation
for suffering to adversaries
relatives.

4. Exist. Syst. incitative
Repressive motives
will take the place of
inciting motives
under the present
order of things.

5. Death inadequate. Fine adequate.
Fear of death in this
case cannot operate
on account of public
opinion, but fear of
pecuniary punishment
will.

6. II. Challengee. Efficiency greater
As to challengee –
Efficiency yet greater
than in the case of
challenger.

7. Challengee. Utter prevented, to accepte
Prevention of utterance,
is prevention
of acceptance, of
challenge.

8. Challengee. Stronger incentives none
In the case of challengee,
no incentives
can be found over-powering
the force
of repressive motives
here held out.

---page break---

9. Challenger Challengee
Sole conceivable case
of conflict completely
voluntary – on each
part, a mutual desire
of assassination.

10. Evil minimized
In this case, evil at it's
minimum.

11. Exist. System Satisfaction none
Under existing system,
absence of satisfactive
remedy.
See 5 infra

---page break---

. 1. Existg System Inadequacy.
Existing system –
inadequacy for repression
as to substantive
and adjective
law.

2. Substantive law
1. As to substantive
law, repressive motives
held out next
to none.

3. Substantive Law
Confusion of the
substantive law
without distinction of
species of homicide.

4. Substantive Law
No distinction as to
diversity in mischievousness
of the several
species of homicide.

5. Substantive Law
Entire omission of
satisfactive remedy.
See 11 supra

6. Inefficiency Cause
Efficient cause of
this defect, Laws only
made to bring money
into ruler's coffers.

7. Inefficiency Cause Law-profit
This sinister profit
the cause of the
original Legislator's
blindness.

Identifier: | JB/064/075/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 64.
Date_1	1825-09-05	Marginal Summary Numbering	1-11, 1-7
Box	064	Main Headings	Penal Code
Folio number	075	Info in main headings field	Penal Code
Image	001	Titles
Category	Marginal summary sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering
Penner		Watermarks
Marginals		Paper Producer
Corrections	Jeremy Bentham	Paper Produced in Year
Notes public	[[notes_public::"Consult for Duelling Extinguished" [note in Bentham's hand]]]	ID Number	20429
Box Contents