JB/056/019/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/056/019/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
Line 5: Line 5:


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 13:22, 2 January 2025

Click Here To Edit

1826 Decr 17
Procedure Code

Examiner 17th Decr 1826.
(From the Stamford News)

* Not many months ago, a kindhearted, but wooden-headed
Magistrate of Surrey absolutely persuaded a
jury to find a verdict of guilty against a poor fellow
whose innocence was so apparent that they would
not wait for his defence:- His reason was "if you
"acquit him, the Court fees will ruin him; but if you
"find him guilty, he shall be fined one shilling
"and discharged!!!"



Identifier: | JB/056/019/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 56.

Date_1

1826-12-17

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

056

Main Headings

Procedure Code

Folio number

019

Info in main headings field

Procedure Code

Image

001

Titles

Examiner 17th Decr 1826 / (From the Stamford News)

Category

Collectanea

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

18075

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in