JB/056/046/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/056/046/001: Difference between revisions

Calliope (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Calliope (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 11: Line 11:
of the alledged collative fact; on only the quantity on<lb/>
of the alledged collative fact; on only the quantity on<lb/>
value assigned to the subject matter of the demand<lb/></p>
value assigned to the subject matter of the demand<lb/></p>
<p>5. Note, that superiority in quality, is superiority<lb/>
in quantity of <hi rend="underline">value</hi>.<lb/></p>
C. [Ablative facts] In the case of a <hi rend="underline">wrong</hi>, an<lb/>
inculpative fact on the part of the proposed Defendant<lb/>
thence a collative fact with relation to the Pursuer's<lb/>
right on title <gap/> satisfaction <unclear>at</unclear> his charge is <gap/> <add>an act</add><lb/>
of the <gap/> of those which, by the law in question, are<lb/>
constituted offences, unless accompanied by some<lb/>
one of the circumstances included in a correspondent<lb/>
list of justificative on exemptive circumstances<lb/>
If any such ablative fact has place, his<lb/>
title to the service in question has no place If, of<lb/>
any such ablative fact the existence be known,<lb/>
to him, he is in a state of evil consciousness with<lb/>
relation to his demand, consciousness of the invalidity<lb/>
of it, and of the groundlessness of the vexation<lb/>
he is seeking to impose on the Defendant: and,<lb/>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 16:49, 11 January 2025

Click Here To Edit

1825. Feb.y March 12 Revised

Procedure Code Ch.VIII.

S.

Notes to Demand Paper B.

4. From the Defendant's counterstatement;
should any , it will appear what is the object
of his contestation: whether it is the applicability
of the alledged collative fact; on only the quantity on
value assigned to the subject matter of the demand

5. Note, that superiority in quality, is superiority
in quantity of value.

C. [Ablative facts] In the case of a wrong, an
inculpative fact on the part of the proposed Defendant
thence a collative fact with relation to the Pursuer's
right on title satisfaction at his charge is an act
of the of those which, by the law in question, are
constituted offences, unless accompanied by some
one of the circumstances included in a correspondent
list of justificative on exemptive circumstances
If any such ablative fact has place, his
title to the service in question has no place If, of
any such ablative fact the existence be known,
to him, he is in a state of evil consciousness with
relation to his demand, consciousness of the invalidity
of it, and of the groundlessness of the vexation
he is seeking to impose on the Defendant: and,



Identifier: | JB/056/046/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 56.

Date_1

1825-02

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

056

Main Headings

Procedure Code

Folio number

046

Info in main headings field

Procedure Code

Image

001

Titles

Notes to Demand Paper B

Category

Copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

D5 / E3

Penner

Watermarks

J WHATMAN TURKEY MILL 1824

Marginals

Paper Producer

Jonathan Blenman

Corrections

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Produced in Year

1824

Notes public

[[notes_public::"March 12 Revised" [note in Bentham's hand]]]

ID Number

18102

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in