JB/056/052/003: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/056/052/003: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head>1826 July 20 <note>4</note><lb/>Procedure Code <sic>Ch</sic> Formularies. Rudiments</head> <!-- this page is organised in two columns --> <p>Instruments arranged in the Order of <hi rend="underline">Time</hi></p> <p>I. <add>Initiative or</add> <sic>Originative</sic> Application<lb/>Instruments</p> <p>I. Application simply <sic>inforamtive</sic><lb/>not <sic>testimentational</sic></p> <p>II. Application simply <sic>petitive</sic><lb/>not <sic>onerative</sic> &#x2014; not<lb/><sic>testimentational</sic></p> <p>III Application <hi rend="underline">onerously</hi><lb/><sic>petitive</sic>: <del>which</del> <add>and<lb/><sic>testimentational.</sic>. This a</add></p> <p.1 Application simply<lb/><sic>onerative</sic>.  Suit, non<lb/>penal and right-demanding<lb/>not <hi rend="underline">wrong-imputing</hi>.</p> <p>2. Application <sic>inculpative.</sic><lb/>Suit penal and<lb/>wrong-imputing, but<lb/>not <gap/></p> <p>3. Application <sic>criminative</sic>.<lb/>Suit <sic>criminative</sic><lb/>and purely public<lb/>wrong-imputing; or<lb/>public-private wrong imputing</p> <p>IV. Of <add>In</add> Applications<lb/>simply <sic>petitive,</sic> the<lb/>the service demanded<lb/>of the Judge will if<lb/>rendered not be made<lb/>at the charge of an<lb/>individual</p> <p>Service thus requested<lb/>may be<lb/>1. Evidence <gap/><lb/>to serve as pre appointed<lb/>evidence
<head>1826 July 20 <note>4</note><lb/>Procedure Code <sic>Ch</sic> Formularies. Rudiments</head> <!-- this page is organised in two columns --> <p>Instruments arranged in the Order of <hi rend="underline">Time</hi></p> <p>I. <add>Initiative or</add> <sic>Originative</sic> Application<lb/>Instruments</p> <p>I. Application simply <sic>inforamtive</sic><lb/>not <sic>testimentational</sic></p> <p>II. Application simply <sic>petitive</sic><lb/>not <sic>onerative</sic> &#x2014; not<lb/><sic>testimentational</sic></p> <p>III Application <hi rend="underline">onerously</hi><lb/><sic>petitive</sic>: <del>which</del> <add>and<lb/><sic>testimentational.</sic>. This a</add></p> <p>1 Application simply<lb/><sic>onerative</sic>.  Suit, non<lb/>penal and right-demanding<lb/>not <hi rend="underline">wrong-imputing</hi>.</p> <p>2. Application <sic>inculpative.</sic><lb/>Suit penal and<lb/>wrong-imputing, but<lb/>not <gap/></p> <p>3. Application <sic>criminative</sic>.<lb/>Suit <sic>criminative</sic><lb/>and purely public<lb/>wrong-imputing; or<lb/>public-private wrong imputing</p> <p>IV. Of <add>In</add> Applications<lb/>simply <sic>petitive,</sic> the<lb/>the service demanded<lb/>of the Judge will if<lb/>rendered not be made<lb/>at the charge of an<lb/>individual</p> <p>Service thus requested<lb/>may be<lb/>1. Evidence <gap/><lb/>to serve as pre appointed<lb/>evidence</p> <p>2.<del><gap/></del> <add>Function, evidence character</add><lb/>interpretation<lb/>Function interpretative</p> <p>3. Law-<sic>emendative</sic><lb/>Function eventually<lb/><sic>emendative</sic></p> <p>Correspondent to these<lb/>several species of Judiciary<lb/>applications<lb/>will be the substance<lb/>and form of the several<lb/><hi rend="underline">Demand Papers</hi>.</p> <pb/> <p>II. Judges proposed Co-informants<lb/>examination<lb/>mandate or Attendance-requiring<lb/>Mandate</p> <p>III. Judge's proposed Co-pursuers examination <add><sic>examinative</sic><lb/>or <add>Examination purpose</add> Mandate or Attendance<lb/>requiring Mandate</p> <p>IV Judge's proposed &#x2014;<lb/>non-litigant witnesses<lb/>examination mandate<lb/>or say examination paper<lb/>or Attendance-requiring<lb/>mandate</p> <p>V. Judge's proposed Defendant's<lb/>examination<lb/>mandate or say Examination<lb/>paper or Attendance<lb/>requiring Mandate</p> <!-- at the bottom of the column --> <p>Called for by an <sic>onerative</sic><lb/>Application will be<lb/>on the part of the <add>proposed</add> Defendant<lb/>a <hi rend="underline">Defence-Paper</hi>.</p>
 
 


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 10:39, 16 January 2025

Click Here To Edit

1826 July 20 4
Procedure Code Ch Formularies. Rudiments

Instruments arranged in the Order of Time

I. Initiative or Originative Application
Instruments

I. Application simply inforamtive
not testimentational

II. Application simply petitive
not onerative — not
testimentational

III Application onerously
petitive: which and
testimentational.. This a

1 Application simply
onerative. Suit, non
penal and right-demanding
not wrong-imputing.

2. Application inculpative.
Suit penal and
wrong-imputing, but
not

3. Application criminative.
Suit criminative
and purely public
wrong-imputing; or
public-private wrong imputing

IV. Of In Applications
simply petitive, the
the service demanded
of the Judge will if
rendered not be made
at the charge of an
individual

Service thus requested
may be
1. Evidence
to serve as pre appointed
evidence

2. Function, evidence character
interpretation
Function interpretative

3. Law-emendative
Function eventually
emendative

Correspondent to these
several species of Judiciary
applications
will be the substance
and form of the several
Demand Papers.


---page break---

II. Judges proposed Co-informants
examination
mandate or Attendance-requiring
Mandate

III. Judge's proposed Co-pursuers examination examinative
or <add>Examination purpose
Mandate or Attendance
requiring Mandate

IV Judge's proposed —
non-litigant witnesses
examination mandate
or say examination paper
or Attendance-requiring
mandate

V. Judge's proposed Defendant's
examination
mandate or say Examination
paper or Attendance
requiring Mandate

Called for by an onerative
Application will be
on the part of the proposed Defendant
a Defence-Paper.



Identifier: | JB/056/052/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 56.

Date_1

1825-01-28

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

056

Main Headings

Procedure Code

Folio number

052

Info in main headings field

Procedure Code Ch. Formularies Rudiments

Image

003

Titles

Category

Rudiments sheet (brouillon)

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

F3 / F4

Penner

Watermarks

J WHATMAN TURKEY MILL 1824

Marginals

Paper Producer

Jonathan Blenman

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1824

Notes public

ID Number

18108

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in