JB/056/060/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/056/060/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto upload
 
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>1825. <sic>Feb<hi rend="superscript">y.</hi></sic> 7<lb/>Procedure Code <add>Formularies</add></head> <p><note><sic>Ch.</sic>lb/>&sect; Witnesses Attendance<lb/>requiring Mandate</note></p> <p>Epistolary response allowing</p> <p><note>6<lb/>Epistolary response<lb/>allowing in case of<lb/>inability to attend</note></p> <p><sic>Art.</sic> 9 In case of your inability to attend, as<lb/>above, you will do well to send to the Judicatory a<lb/><del>Testament Letter of testimony</del> <add>a Letter testification</add> declaring what <del>you</del> has<lb/>been written your knowledge or belief concerning <add>touching</add> the matter<lb/>in dispute <!-- brackets in pencil --> [between the parties] since by this means <add>that vile convention of</add> the disappointment<lb/>occasioned by your non attendance may <del>natu</del><lb/>preponderantly be lessened.</p> <!-- next two paragraphs crossed though in ink --> <p>II. Veracity securing warning.</p> <p><sic>Art.</sic> <gap/> that if in such Letter of testimony<lb/>there be any thing of <sic>falshood</sic> either wilful or through rashness,<lb/>you will be responsible for it in the same measure<lb/>as if uttered by word of mount in the presence of the Judge.</p> <p>II. Veracity securing warning</p> <p><sic>Art.</sic> For the more effectual security against<lb/><del><gap/></del> all such <sic>falshood</sic> <del>you will <gap/> <gap/> </del> <add>as also against unintentional want of constant<lb/>clearness or <sic>compleatness</sic> you will nevertheless remain<lb/>liable to be examined by word of mouth whensoever<lb/>the impediment to your attendance <gap/> have been removed.</p> <p><note>Where attendance<lb/>impossible, necessity<lb/>of providing <del>for the</del><lb/>prompter mode than<lb/>the <gap/></note></p> <p>III Epistolary-response allowing</p> <p>N.B. As in every case where by reason of<lb/>distance the attendance of the witness <add>or party</add> <gap/> the requested time<lb/>is impossible, as in the case of a distant county, there<lb/>must be a promise must be made as per &sect;.  for<lb/>examination in the epistolary mode, if <add>when</add> any doubt has<lb/>place as to <del>the</del> attendance at the judicatory the <del> party may <add>will do well to</add><lb/><gap/></del> the Judge at the desire of the party in question<lb/>may settle with him an Epistolary Examination paper and<lb/>send it as <add.to the same <sic>indentant</sic></add> before or after the Attendance requiring <gap/>.</p>
 
 


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 15:21, 21 January 2025

Click Here To Edit

1825. Feby. 7
Procedure Code Formularies

Ch.lb/>§ Witnesses Attendance
requiring Mandate

Epistolary response allowing

6
Epistolary response
allowing in case of
inability to attend

Art. 9 In case of your inability to attend, as
above, you will do well to send to the Judicatory a
Testament Letter of testimony a Letter testification declaring what you has
been written your knowledge or belief concerning touching the matter
in dispute [between the parties] since by this means that vile convention of the disappointment
occasioned by your non attendance may natu
preponderantly be lessened.

II. Veracity securing warning.

Art. that if in such Letter of testimony
there be any thing of falshood either wilful or through rashness,
you will be responsible for it in the same measure
as if uttered by word of mount in the presence of the Judge.

II. Veracity securing warning

Art. For the more effectual security against
all such falshood you will as also against unintentional want of constant
clearness or compleatness you will nevertheless remain
liable to be examined by word of mouth whensoever
the impediment to your attendance have been removed.

Where attendance
impossible, necessity
of providing for the
prompter mode than
the

III Epistolary-response allowing

N.B. As in every case where by reason of
distance the attendance of the witness <add>or party the requested time
is impossible, as in the case of a distant county, there
must be a promise must be made as per §. for
examination in the epistolary mode, if when any doubt has
place as to the attendance at the judicatory the party may will do well to
the Judge at the desire of the party in question
may settle with him an Epistolary Examination paper and
send it as <add.to the same indentant</add> before or after the Attendance requiring .



Identifier: | JB/056/060/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 56.

Date_1

1825-02-07

Marginal Summary Numbering

6-7

Box

056

Main Headings

Procedure Code

Folio number

060

Info in main headings field

Procedure Code Formularies

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

D3 / E3

Penner

Watermarks

J WHATMAN TURKEY MILL 1824

Marginals

George Bentham

Paper Producer

Jonathan Blenman

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1824

Notes public

ID Number

18116

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in