JB/023/117/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/023/117/001: Difference between revisions

← Older editNewer edit →
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
10,213 edits
m Protected "JB/023/117/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
10,213 edits
mNo edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<p>14 The <unclear>Commonwealth</unclear> <add>so far</add> <del>thus</del> constituted - shall it be <hi rend="underline">simple</hi> <note>(6) <del>3</del> Letter to<lb/>
<p>14 The <unclear>Commonwealth</unclear> <add>so far</add> <del>thus</del> constituted - shall it be <hi rend="underline">simple</hi> <note>(6) <del>3</del> <unclear>T</unclear> Letter to<lb/>
<del>Propose</del> Constitution <lb/>
<del>Propose</del> Constitution <lb/>
Simplicity of <gap/>tiveness?</note><lb/>
Simplicity of <unclear>federativeness</unclear>?</note><lb/>
or <gap/>tive? <gap/> or made the Friend Const<gap/>tive of the<lb/>
or federative? Simple or made the Friend <unclear>Constiative</unclear> of the<lb/>
time of the first <unclear>Revolution</unclear>, <add>or as under the Anglo-American</add> it was, as <gap/>.</p>
time of the first <unclear>Revolution</unclear>, <add>or as under the Anglo-American</add> it was, as federative.</p>
<p>United States Constitution <hi rend="underline">federative</hi>.</p>
<p>United States Constitution <hi rend="underline">federative</hi>.</p>


<p>Federative I <add>pr<gap/>ably</add> Assume is to be: that being what you are<lb/>
<p>Federative I <add>pr<gap/>ably</add> assume it to be: that being what you are<lb/>
accustomed to, and therefore <del><gap/></del> <add>in most unexceptionable grand</add> <del>good <gap/> <gap/> and</del><lb/>
accustomed to, and therefore <del><gap/></del> <add>in most unexceptionable grand</add> <del>good <gap/> proposed</del><lb/>
<add><gap/> point whether decided or no,</add> to a in preference. This excepted, this is not that <lb/>
<add>disposed whether decided or no,</add> to adopt in preference. This excepted, there is not that <lb/>
reason in favour of it which has place in the case of<lb/>
reason in favour of it which has place in the case of<lb/>
the Anglo-American Commonwealth. <add>[+] <del>vastness if the</del> </add> The vast extent <note>[+] <del>The <gap/> the scale</del><lb/>
the Anglo-American Commonwealth. <add>[+]</add> The vast <del>vastness if the</del> </add> extent <note>[+] <del>The <gap/></del> the subject<lb/>
just matters of Government <lb/>
matters of Government <lb/>
many there<lb/>
many there<lb/>
are, as to which the</note><lb/>
are, as to which the</note><lb/>
of the aggregate <add><del>quantity</del> of the territory</add> <del><gap/>tory</del> belonging to <del><gap/></del> those several States<lb/>
of the aggregate <add><del>quantity</del> of the territory</add> <del><gap/>tory</del> belonging to <del><gap/></del> those several States<lb/>
renders <del>the</del> <add>that sort of partial </add> separation <del><gap/> may <gap/></del> un<gap/>lable<lb/>
renders <del>the</del> <add>that sort of partial </add> separation <del><gap/> may matter</del> unavoidable<lb/>
and the <del>un<gap/>ted</del><add>existence of a</add> supreme government <add>in an</add> underided <add>state in the</add> <del><gap/> <gap/> and</del><lb/>
and the <del>un<gap/>ted</del><add>existence of a</add> supreme government <add>in an</add> undivided <add>state in the</add> <del><gap/> <gap/> and</del><lb/>
<add>hand of one and</add> the same legislatitive authority <add><del>Chamber</del></add> altogether inlegible<add> <del><gap/></del></add> not<lb/>
<add>hand of one and</add> the same legislatitive authority <add><del>Chamber</del></add> altogether inlegible<add> <del>unapt</del></add> not<lb/>
to say impracticable.</p>
to say impracticable.</p>


Line 31: Line 31:
Legislature.  As to matters for the cognizance of which<lb/>
Legislature.  As to matters for the cognizance of which<lb/>
such local legislatures would be recessary, and the relation<lb/>
such local legislatures would be recessary, and the relation<lb/>
as between them and the Supreme <add>Legislation <gap/></add> - these points <del>I have <gap/></del><lb/>
as between them and the Supreme <add>Legislature <gap/></add> - these points <del>I have <gap/></del><lb/>
<del>taken into consideration <gap/> made provision <gap/> <gap/></del>
<del>taken into consideration <gap/> made provision <gap/> <gap/></del>
<del>proposed Constitutional</del> Code. <note>consideration has bee<lb/>
<del>proposed Constitutional</del> Code. <note>consideration has been<lb/>
find in my abovementioned</note></p>
found in my abovementioned</note></p>


<note><hi rend="underline">NOTE</hi><lb/>
<note><hi rend="underline">NOTE</hi><lb/>
Line 43: Line 43:


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 16:56, 20 February 2025

Click Here To Edit

14 The Commonwealth so far thus constituted - shall it be simple (6) 3 T Letter to
Propose Constitution
Simplicity of federativeness?
or federative? Simple or made the Friend Constiative of the
time of the first Revolution, or as under the Anglo-American it was, as federative.

United States Constitution federative.

Federative I prably assume it to be: that being what you are
accustomed to, and therefore in most unexceptionable grand good proposed
disposed whether decided or no, to adopt in preference. This excepted, there is not that
reason in favour of it which has place in the case of
the Anglo-American Commonwealth. [+] The vast vastness if the </add> extent [+] The the subject
matters of Government
many there
are, as to which the
of the aggregate quantity of the territory tory belonging to those several States
renders the that sort of partial separation may matter unavoidable
and the untedexistence of a supreme government in an undivided state in the and
hand of one and the same legislatitive authority Chamber altogether inlegible unapt not
to say impracticable.

15. Supposing the government a simple one as above, still
indispensably necessary as to various local matters to an extent
more or less considerable indispensably would be a
legislative body in each one of your States. In that case Sublegislature
would be the denomination of each such local
Legislature. As to matters for the cognizance of which
such local legislatures would be recessary, and the relation
as between them and the Supreme Legislature - these points I have
taken into consideration made provision proposed Constitutional Code. consideration has been
found in my abovementioned

NOTE
117 was attached to 118
under the heading 'J.B.
to the Belgians'



Identifier: | JB/023/117/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 23.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

023

Main Headings

lord brougham displayed

Folio number

117

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d6 / f6

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

street & co 1830

Marginals

Paper Producer

antonio alcala galiano

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1830

Notes public

ID Number

7988

Box Contents

Retrieved from "https://transcribe-bentham.ucl.ac.uk/index.php?title=JB/023/117/001&oldid=369908"
UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in