JB/056/174/001

Click Here To Edit

1827. Octr. 19
Law Amendment Constitutional Code

Ch. Propositions
§. Procedure

11
Judicial exception
the application of appropriate
remedies

By execution — judicial execution may be understood application
made of the appropriate remedy or remedies

12
Where no wrong to
redress it may be understood
as the procuring
its performance

Applied to judicial application at large in the sense in
which it has for its object any operation other than that which
connects in the application made of a judicial remedy to wrong in
some determinate shape it by it may be understood the performance
of the operation be it may what it may of which it
has for its object the procuring the performance

13
By judicial execution
Judge renders a correspondent
service.

By performance of that operation which the application
upon him to to the Judge renders to the applicant himself, some
other individual, some other particular class of individuals, or the
community at large, a correspondent service — say a judicial service

<p.<note>14
In existing system
services rendered

Of these Services those which under the existing system are rendered by the judicial
authority are the following.

If These not rendered are the following

services not rendered

Those not rendered by it [are] the following

15
Of consultative applications
the object the obtaining
from the declaration is
to what would be his
decree in a certain
supposed state of things

By the consultation application may be denominated designated
an application which has not its object the obtaining at the hands
of the Judge a declaration stating what to what effect in a certain/supposed state of things under a certain article
of the law therein calling for decision, his will or would be

For <gap/ exclusion of vague and ungrounded application
a condition attached to compliance with an application for this purpose
might be indication afforded of some determinate article or
articles of written law in which this application has its ground.

16
Rendering this service
is the exercise of the Judge's
pre interpretative function

By rendering the correspondent service, — the service then demanded
a correspondent function will be performed by the Judge, it may be stiled the pre interpretative function.

Identifier: | JB/056/174/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 56.
Date_1	1827-10-19	Marginal Summary Numbering	11-16
Box	056	Main Headings	Law Amendment
Folio number	174	Info in main headings field	Law Amendments
Image	001	Titles
Category	Text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	C3
Penner		Watermarks	BROCKLESBY & MORBEY 1827
Marginals	George Bentham	Paper Producer	Edmund Henry Barker
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year	1827
Notes public		ID Number	18230
Box Contents