JB/023/123/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/023/123/002: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>1830 Nov. 16</p>
<head>J.B. <del>against</del> to France against Death</head>
<note>Death<lb/>
9 Exe. <gap/><gap/></note><lb/>
<note>19<lb/>
Apt checks, what<lb/>
1. When it would be <lb/>
groundless, obligation<lb/>
to check and make<lb/>
known the evidence<lb/>
as well as the fact</note><lb/>


<p>Now the these seen apt and sufficient restrain - what<lb/>
are they? <hi rend="underline">Answer</hi>. In the case where by subsequented evidence<lb/>
the punishment it is shown would be inflated be groundless<lb/>
the obligation of making known this same evidence: making it<lb/>
<unclear>known</unclear> as effectually as the evidece in the grant of which the<lb/>
order for the punishment was given or would have been given<lb/>
was made or could have been made known <gap/> <gap/>  <gap/><lb/>
the case when it is in the <add>supposition</add> account of its groundlessness that the<lb/>
punishment if <del><gap/></del></p>


<note>20<lb/>
Where the evidence<lb/>
can not be elicited<lb/>
and made known<lb/>
publicly given to make<lb/>
of the <hi rend="underline">facts</hi> <gap/><lb/>
1. Multitude of Codelinquents</note><lb/>
In the case where the ground is constituted by the multitude<lb/>
of the offenders, there would be <add><add>the</add></add> necessity of stating the number of <lb/>
<add>them, in</add> respect of each of who the elucidation and publication of the evidence<lb/>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 08:54, 20 April 2025

Click Here To Edit

1830 Nov. 16

J.B. against to France against Death Death
9 Exe.

19
Apt checks, what
1. When it would be
groundless, obligation
to check and make
known the evidence
as well as the fact

Now the these seen apt and sufficient restrain - what
are they? Answer. In the case where by subsequented evidence
the punishment it is shown would be inflated be groundless
the obligation of making known this same evidence: making it
known as effectually as the evidece in the grant of which the
order for the punishment was given or would have been given
was made or could have been made known
the case when it is in the supposition account of its groundlessness that the
punishment if

20
Where the evidence
can not be elicited
and made known
publicly given to make
of the facts
1. Multitude of Codelinquents

In the case where the ground is constituted by the multitude
of the offenders, there would be <add>the</add> necessity of stating the number of
them, in respect of each of who the elucidation and publication of the evidence



Identifier: | JB/023/123/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 23.

Date_1

1830-12-01

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

023

Main Headings

lord brougham displayed

Folio number

123

Info in main headings field

jb to belgians

Image

002

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e9 / f18 / f11

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

street & co 1830

Marginals

Paper Producer

antonio alcala galiano

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1830

Notes public

ID Number

7994

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in