★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>1827. <sic>Oct<hi rend="superscript">r.</hi></sic><lb/><add>Law Amendment</add> <del>Constitutional</del> Code</head> <p><note><sic>Ch.</sic> Propositions<lb/>§. Procedure<lb/><add>Sole proper course<lb/>Present courses</note></p> <p><add><del>1. <gap/> 2. <gap/>2 <gap/> 3. <gap/> 4. <foreign>ex officio</foreign></del></add><p> <!-- to the right of the last text --> <p><add><del>In <gap/> cases this must be <gap/> <gap/><lb/>but the mode is still the <gap/> same.</del></add></p> <p><note>Simplicity and fitness<lb/>of this mode of proceeding</note></p> <p>Of this mode of proceeding the simplicity is no less perfect than<lb/>its fitness its suitableness to the purpose to every purpose of justice<lb?>to the character of the true state of the relative facts in each <add>individual</add> case, in so<lb/>far as the nature of the case admitted of its being <gap/>.</p> <p>In a word there is but one mode well adapted to the purpose<lb/>of <gap/> at the truth of fact, and this <add>the above</add> is that mode.</p> <p>Observe now the vast virtue of the mode in present practice employed<lb/>under the <gap/> of <gap/> at the truth of <gap/>: how much<lb/>more complicated than every one of them are, and by an in proportion<lb/>that any complication <del><sic>Misadapted</sic></del> <add><gap/> <sic>Misadapted</sic> to the <sic>aledged</sic> purpose: adapted<lb/>to the suppression of correct <add>and thence of complete</add> and to the production <add>exhibition and <gap/></add> production <del><gap/></del><lb/>of <gap/> evidence</p> <p>☞ Go on to 1. Action 2. Bills <add>3. <gap/> in <gap/></add> <!-- deletion in pencil --><del>3. Indictment 4. Information 5. <foreign>Ex Officio</foreign> <sic>d<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic></del><lb/>Mention as omitted <del><gap/></del> <gap/> <foreign>Mandemus.</foreign> 2. <gap/> Warrants agree on the useless<lb/><gap/> inquiry on bad evidence</p> <p><note>Not only <add>to</add> simple suits<lb/.<del>But the most comp</del> is this<lb/>applicable but to all as<lb/>the most complex are<lb/>resolvable into a number<lb/>of single suits</note></p> | <head>1827. <sic>Oct<hi rend="superscript">r.</hi></sic><lb/><add>Law Amendment</add> <del>Constitutional</del> Code</head> <p><note><sic>Ch.</sic> Propositions<lb/>§. Procedure<lb/><add>Sole proper course<lb/>Present courses</note></p> <p><add><del>1. <gap/> 2. <gap/>2 <gap/> 3. <gap/> 4. <foreign>ex officio</foreign></del></add><p> <!-- to the right of the last text --> <p><add><del>In <gap/> cases this must be <gap/> <gap/><lb/>but the mode is still the <gap/> same.</del></add></p> <p><note>Simplicity and fitness<lb/>of this mode of proceeding</note></p> <p>Of this mode of proceeding the simplicity is no less perfect than<lb/>its fitness its suitableness to the purpose to every purpose of justice<lb?>to the character of the true state of the relative facts in each <add>individual</add> case, in so<lb/>far as the nature of the case admitted of its being <gap/>.</p> <p>In a word there is but one mode well adapted to the purpose<lb/>of <gap/> at the truth of fact, and this <add>the above</add> is that mode.</p> <p>Observe now the vast virtue of the mode in present practice employed<lb/>under the <gap/> of <gap/> at the truth of <gap/>: how much<lb/>more complicated than every one of them are, and by an in proportion<lb/>that any complication <del><sic>Misadapted</sic></del> <add><gap/> <sic>Misadapted</sic> to the <sic>aledged</sic> purpose: adapted<lb/>to the suppression of correct <add>and thence of complete</add> and to the production <add>exhibition and <gap/></add> production <del><gap/></del><lb/>of <gap/> evidence</p> <p>☞ Go on to 1. Action 2. Bills <add>3. <gap/> in <gap/></add> <!-- deletion in pencil --><del>3. Indictment 4. Information 5. <foreign>Ex Officio</foreign> <sic>d<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic></del><lb/>Mention as omitted <del><gap/></del> <gap/> <foreign>Mandemus.</foreign> 2. <gap/> Warrants agree on the useless<lb/><gap/> inquiry on bad evidence</p> <p><note>Not only <add>to</add> simple suits<lb/.<del>But the most comp</del> is this<lb/>applicable but to all as<lb/>the most complex are<lb/>resolvable into a number<lb/>of single suits</note></p> <p>If this is the case in <del><gap/></del> suits <add>cases</add> of the utmost degree of simplicity,<lb/>not less it is so in <del><gap/></del> suits <add>cases</add> of the utmost degree of complexity<lb/>no <del><gap/></del> suit but is resolvable into a number of less <gap/> of single<lb/>suits, each of them capable of being begun <gap/> and ended in the<lb/>same mode as above the number of suits less or greater but the mode<lb/>of producing exactly <add><gap/></add> the same</p> <p>On the number of these<lb/>elementary suits <add>ever <gap/></add> they<lb/>may all; be begun <del>continued<lb/>& terminated together</del> at<lb/>the same time the time<lb/>of termination of each<lb/>only depending on the<lb/>facility or difficulty as<lb/>to the evidence</note></p> <p>As to the delay to the number of those elementary suits were<lb/>so great there is no reason why <del><gap/></del> in its commencement <add>beginning</add> continuance<lb/>or for its termination it should want for any others: why they should<lb/>not be every one of them be begun <del>and</del> at the same time each of<lb/>them <del>being</del> receiving therefore <del>such</del> continuance and termination at such<lb/>times as <del>the facility</del> should be the result of the facility or difficulty as to<lb/>the obtainment of the evidence.</p> <p><del>Cases which present the highest degree of complexity are those <gap/><lb/>which are</del></p> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}} |
1827. Octr.
Law Amendment Constitutional Code
Ch. Propositions
§. Procedure
<add>Sole proper course
Present courses
1. 2. 2 3. 4. ex officio
In cases this must be
but the mode is still the same.
Simplicity and fitness
of this mode of proceeding
Of this mode of proceeding the simplicity is no less perfect than
its fitness its suitableness to the purpose to every purpose of justice<lb?>to the character of the true state of the relative facts in each individual case, in so
far as the nature of the case admitted of its being .
In a word there is but one mode well adapted to the purpose
of at the truth of fact, and this the above is that mode.
Observe now the vast virtue of the mode in present practice employed
under the of at the truth of : how much
more complicated than every one of them are, and by an in proportion
that any complication Misadapted Misadapted to the aledged purpose: adapted
to the suppression of correct <add>and thence of complete and to the production exhibition and production
of evidence
☞ Go on to 1. Action 2. Bills 3. in 3. Indictment 4. Information 5. Ex Officio do
Mention as omitted Mandemus. 2. Warrants agree on the useless
inquiry on bad evidence
Not only to simple suits<lb/.But the most comp is this
applicable but to all as
the most complex are
resolvable into a number
of single suits
If this is the case in suits cases of the utmost degree of simplicity,
not less it is so in suits cases of the utmost degree of complexity
no suit but is resolvable into a number of less of single
suits, each of them capable of being begun and ended in the
same mode as above the number of suits less or greater but the mode
of producing exactly the same
On the number of these
elementary suits ever they
may all; be begun continued
& terminated together at
the same time the time
of termination of each
only depending on the
facility or difficulty as
to the evidence</note>
As to the delay to the number of those elementary suits were
so great there is no reason why in its commencement beginning continuance
or for its termination it should want for any others: why they should
not be every one of them be begun and at the same time each of
them being receiving therefore such continuance and termination at such
times as the facility should be the result of the facility or difficulty as to
the obtainment of the evidence.
Cases which present the highest degree of complexity are those
which are
Identifier: | JB/056/183/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 56. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1827-10 |
Not numbered |
||
056 |
Law Amendment |
||
183 |
Law Amendment Code |
||
001 |
|||
Text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
C3 / E3 |
||
BROCKLESBY & MORBEY 1827 |
|||
Edmund Henry Barker |
|||
1827 |
|||
18239 |
|||