JB/056/197/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/056/197/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto upload
 
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>1827. <sic>Oct<hi rend="superscript">r.</hi></sic. 27<lb/>Law Amendment</head> <p><note>Propositions<lb/><sic./Ch</sic> Procedure<lb/>Existing system<lb/>Equity procedures apply<lb/>to a case domestic or Parliamentary.</note></p> <p>1<lb/>Equity procedure applied<lb/>to a case domestic or<lb/>Parliamentary</note></p> <p>Equity forms.  To form an example of the<lb/><gap/> means then employed in domestic or in Parliamentary<lb/>procedure.  Truth <add><gap/></add> is at <add>by <gap/></add> the less the object in any one of <gap/><lb/>than in any other.  If a <gap/> would be <gap/> to do<lb/>any thing can ever have place in <add>against the <gap/></add> a Bill in Equity to <gap/> <gap/><lb/>causes a Bill <gap/> by the member <add>Chairman</add> of a Committee against a witness<lb?>would it <gap/> <gap/> the <gap/> if as in that his object can be<lb/>But <gap/> <gap/> be accustomed to <gap/> <gap/> in the one<lb/>case and not in either of the <gap/> others</p> <p><note>No: can it be <gap/><lb/>to say it, will the <del>objects</del><lb/><gap/> of Equity have<lb/>to reason to its <gap/><lb/>delay vexation and <sic>expence</sic><lb/>that was the object<Lb/>for the sake of the proper<lb/><gap/> act of the<lb/><gap/></note></p> <p>If</p> <p><add>as</add> In this <gap[/> of<lb/><gap/> and <gap/><lb/>how they will be Guardian<lb?>of the <gap/><lb/>embrace an acceptance?</note></p> <p><note>2<lb/>Under existing system<lb/>so may judicatories<lb/>so many systems of<lb/>procedure</note></p> <p>If more species of judicatories were instituted,<lb/>proceeding on the principle of the existing system, there<lb/>should be so many different systems of proceedings with<lb/>corresponding <del>differences as</del> sets of different exclusionary<lb/>rules <del>as to the sh source and shape</del> of Evidence<lb/>as to the source from which and shape in which it should<lb/>and should not be reasonable</p>
 
 


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 15:12, 5 June 2025

Click Here To Edit

1827. <sic>Octr.</sic. 27
Law Amendment

Propositions
<sic./Ch</sic> Procedure
Existing system
Equity procedures apply
to a case domestic or Parliamentary.

1
Equity procedure applied
to a case domestic or
Parliamentary</note>

Equity forms. To form an example of the
means then employed in domestic or in Parliamentary
procedure. Truth is at by the less the object in any one of
than in any other. If a would be to do
any thing can ever have place in against the a Bill in Equity to
causes a Bill by the member Chairman of a Committee against a witness<lb?>would it the if as in that his object can be
But be accustomed to in the one
case and not in either of the others

No: can it be
to say it, will the objects
of Equity have
to reason to its
delay vexation and expence
that was the object
for the sake of the proper
act of the

If

as In this <gap[/> of
and
how they will be Guardian<lb?>of the
embrace an acceptance?</note>

2
Under existing system
so may judicatories
so many systems of
procedure

If more species of judicatories were instituted,
proceeding on the principle of the existing system, there
should be so many different systems of proceedings with
corresponding differences as sets of different exclusionary
rules as to the sh source and shape of Evidence
as to the source from which and shape in which it should
and should not be reasonable



Identifier: | JB/056/197/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 56.

Date_1

1827-10-27

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-2

Box

056

Main Headings

Law Amendment

Folio number

197

Info in main headings field

Law Amendment

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

Watermarks

BROCKLESBY & MORBEY 1827

Marginals

George Bentham

Paper Producer

Edmund Henry Barker

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1827

Notes public

ID Number

18253

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in