JB/056/208/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/056/208/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto upload
 
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>1827. <sic>Nov<hi rend="superscript">r.</hi></sic> 3<lb/>Law Amendment.</head> <p><note>Propositions<lb/><sic>Ch</sic> procedure<lb/>Beginning</note></p> <p><note.34<lb/>No transmission through<lb/>third persons can be<lb/>made without addition<lb/>of <sic>expence</sic></note></p> <p>If it be not from the party that to Judge receives the statement of<lb/>the case it must be from some one else to whom they the party the statement<lb/>has been made.  But if <add>if it be</add> from <del>the</del> a person other than the party<lb/>that he hears it, he can not have it unless the party be saddled<lb/>with <sic>expence</sic>: for <del><gap/></del> <add>the casual <gap/> of <del><gap/></del></add> the <gap/> of casual beneficence and appropriate<lb/>ability excepted the man will not taken for another vey <gap/><lb/>truly without being paid for it; and <del>to what <gap/></del> whatsoever be<lb/>the information where is the use <add> to what use<.add> in a man receiving it at second<lb/>hand rather than at first hand.</p> <p><note>35<lb/>Rule 1 Exceptions<lb/>excepted first application<lb/>to judge at<lb/>judgement seat</note></p> <p>Hence <del>the <gap/><del> when justice is the object the following rule<lb/>following</p> <p>1. Exceptions excepted let <del>every <gap/> <gap/></del>  no suit have<lb/>any other commencement than by the appearance <add>attendance</add> of the proposed<lb/>plaintiff at the judgement seat, <del>making</del> stating to the Judge what it<lb?>is he wants and what the grounds are on which he wants it <add>prays for it</add></p> <p><note>36<lb/>Exception inability<lb/>to attend</note></p> <p>2. Exceptions are where it is not in <del>the</del> <add>his</add> power <del>of</del> to pay<lb/>attendance or 2. <del>where though he should attend it would not be in<lb/>his power to make his case understood without <gap/></del></p> <p><note>37<lb/>Inability to make himself<lb/>clearly understood<lb?>by judge no sufficient<lb/>excuse for personal<lb/>attendance</note></p> <p>Even supposing him not able <add>of himself</add> to <del>make himself un</del><lb/>cause his case to be understood by the Judge, <add>for</add> this <del><gap/></del> circumstance<lb/>no sufficient reason can be added for excusing<lb/>him from attendance.  Those not being able with sufficient <gap/><lb/>to make his case understood by a Judge may be <gap/> sufficient<lb/>for his calling on the assistance of another person by whom attendance<lb/>shall at the same time be paid.  But it is too rare why he<lb/>himself should not be obliged to attend.  For by his own attendance<lb/>he can <gap/> <gap/> what the disposition of the Judge is in relation<lb/>to him and what it is that it is <del><gap/></dell> likely to be necessary to do<lb/>and to suffer if the <del>carr</del> <add>in either case: to wit the</add> cause say to be carried on, and that<lb/>of its being <gap/></p> <p>from the person to whose behalf he having need of them<lb?>the services of the Judge are called for <add>sooner or later</add> information to some effect<lb/>or other <del>must</del> in <gap/> every case must come: if <add>when</add> not, the<lb/>case is a case of exception and that a very rare one and if yes<lb/>why not directly.  If directly there will be but one sort of person to pay <add>for</add><lb/><!-- continues in the margin and along the edge of the page --> for the communication of it<lb/>if otherwise then directly<lb/>there must be another.<lb/>For the receipt of all<lb/>such information the<lb/>Judge is paid at any rate and without any such <sic>expence</sic> an operation in any case, as above, a denial of justice from another person it was not and<lb/>without bringing with it an <sic>expence</sic> by which <gap/> is given to that <del><gap/></del> prodigious and indefensible state of things.</p>
 
 


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 17:57, 22 June 2025

Click Here To Edit

1827. Novr. 3
Law Amendment.

Propositions
Ch procedure
Beginning

<note.34
No transmission through
third persons can be
made without addition
of expence</note>

If it be not from the party that to Judge receives the statement of
the case it must be from some one else to whom they the party the statement
has been made. But if if it be from the a person other than the party
that he hears it, he can not have it unless the party be saddled
with expence: for the casual of the of casual beneficence and appropriate
ability excepted the man will not taken for another vey
truly without being paid for it; and to what whatsoever be
the information where is the use to what use<.add> in a man receiving it at second
hand rather than at first hand.

35
Rule 1 Exceptions
excepted first application
to judge at
judgement seat

Hence the when justice is the object the following rule
following

1. Exceptions excepted let every no suit have
any other commencement than by the appearance <add>attendance of the proposed
plaintiff at the judgement seat, making stating to the Judge what it<lb?>is he wants and what the grounds are on which he wants it prays for it

36
Exception inability
to attend

2. Exceptions are where it is not in the his power of to pay
attendance or 2. where though he should attend it would not be in
his power to make his case understood without

37
Inability to make himself
clearly understood<lb?>by judge no sufficient
excuse for personal
attendance

Even supposing him not able of himself to make himself un
cause his case to be understood by the Judge, for this circumstance
no sufficient reason can be added for excusing
him from attendance. Those not being able with sufficient
to make his case understood by a Judge may be sufficient
for his calling on the assistance of another person by whom attendance
shall at the same time be paid. But it is too rare why he
himself should not be obliged to attend. For by his own attendance
he can what the disposition of the Judge is in relation
to him and what it is that it is </dell> likely to be necessary to do
and to suffer if the carr
in either case: to wit the cause say to be carried on, and that
of its being

from the person to whose behalf he having need of them<lb?>the services of the Judge are called for sooner or later information to some effect
or other must in every case must come: if when not, the
case is a case of exception and that a very rare one and if yes
why not directly. If directly there will be but one sort of person to pay for
for the communication of it
if otherwise then directly
there must be another.
For the receipt of all
such information the
Judge is paid at any rate and without any such expence an operation in any case, as above, a denial of justice from another person it was not and
without bringing with it an expence by which is given to that prodigious and indefensible state of things.



Identifier: | JB/056/208/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 56.

Date_1

1827-11-03

Marginal Summary Numbering

34-37

Box

056

Main Headings

Law Amendment

Folio number

208

Info in main headings field

Law Amendment

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

D10 / E10

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

George Bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

18264

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in