JB/056/210/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/056/210/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head>1827. <sic>Nov<hi rend="superscript">r.</hi></sic> 4 +<lb/>Law Amendment</head> <p><note><sic>ult</sic><lb/>Propositions<lb/>Procedure<lb/>Initiatory Applications:<lb/>Commencement</note></p> <p><del><gap/> <gap/><lb/><gap/> by procedure inadequate sides<lb/>interest is <gap/> [1]<lb/>&#9758; <gap/> <hi rend="underline">Beginning</hi>.</del></p> <!-- to the right of last text --> <p><del>The existing system is purely <gap/><lb/>The existing system has led to <sic>encrease</sic> of <gap/><lb/>and to <sic>encrease</sic> of <gap/> in <add>an judicature or <gap/> the court <gap/> of mankind</add> in the means of<lb/>mak <note>(for <unclear>occurring</unclear> effect</note></del></p> <p>Completed <add>Made up</add> the list of those <add>individuals</add> in whose instance evidence in<lb/>whatsoever way elicited affords no adequate <gap/> of being<lb/>of use, receives <add>in regard to so <del><gap/></del> whatsoever is to be received at that same judicatory</add> the order in which the <del><gap/></del> evidence<lb/>of the different proposed witnesses <add>or other evidence holders</add> shall <del>be called for</del> present itself.</p> <p><note><del>[1] Propositions such as those<lb/>could not have received existence,<lb/>if the elaborately<lb/>fabricated nursery of<lb/><gap/> had been matter<lb/>of indifference.</del></note></p> <p><note><del>Officially or <gap/><lb/>distinguished excepted<lb/>individual feelings are<lb/>beneath all <gap/> <add>case</add></del></note></p> <p><del>Unaduced with thought no <gap/> <add>in his eyes</add> can not bind itself to <sic>encrease</sic><lb/><gap/>.  The <hi rend="underline">existing</hi> system is not <gap/> with thought, but the<lb/>thought, being <add>the</add> opposite to <add>what the</add> appropriate <gap/> these users.<lb/>How <gap/> they must be exceeded <add>squeezed</add> into the compass of a day<lb/>that which is not put to employ and not what on the part of <gap/><lb/>may render <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> so ever the mass<lb/>all must come into that for that which can not but be his<lb/>at the <gap/> of <gap/> that which might be laid on the <gap/> to<lb/><gap/> or to doing <gap/> <gap/>.</del></p> <p><note>1<lb/>Order in which proposed<lb/>evidence holders shall<lb/>present themselves &#x2014; in<lb/>setting this order <del>consider<lb/>how</del>attention must be<lb/>had to the circumstances<lb/>of each individual as<lb/>in order to minimize<lb/>sufferance &amp; maximize<lb/>comfort</note></p> <p>In <add>each and</add> every individual case to make in that same<lb/>case the provision that may and ought to be made for human<lb/>failing &#x2014; <del><gap/></del> minimizing sufferance maximizing<lb/>comfort, attention to the individual circumstances of that same<lb/>case is necessary: in the case of a wrong, <add><sic>aledged</sic></add> not only to the circumstance<lb/>in which the wrong was done, but to the circumstance<lb/>pecuniary included in which the parties on both sides author<lb/>or authors of the wrong sufferer or sufferers by the wrong<lb/>and in the case of non-litigant witnesses circumstances in respect<lb/>of failure or difficulty of attendance and delivery of the evidence<lb/><note>2<lb/>Existing system <add>in this respect</add> <del>compared</del><lb/>works like a<lb/>steam engine</note><lb/>are placed.  <del>A <gap/> injury pays</del> No attention pays <add>the <gap/> of</add> a <gap/><lb/>to <add>individual</add> circumstance <del><gap/></del> it moves up and down by<lb/>general rules: no such ingredient <del><gap/></del> as thought has it in the composition<lb/>of it.  In its ordinary course the existing systems takes<lb/>for its guide the steam-engine, for its precedent the operation of<lb/>the steam-engine: like that it goes up and down regardless of consequence:<lb/>not that it takes not thought on any occasion; <add><del>there are</del> on no occasion doe sit take thought</add> but for<lb/><del>what it does the thought is worse than <gap/></del><lb/>how little then or now the feelings of the <gap/> may have to<lb/>thought, other persons there are to whose claim to it resistance<lb/>is not possible.</p>
<head>1827. <sic>Nov<hi rend="superscript">r.</hi></sic> 4 +<lb/>Law Amendment</head> <p><note><sic>ult</sic><lb/>Propositions<lb/>Procedure<lb/>&sect;. Initiatory Applications:<lb/><del>(for occurring  effect)</del> <add>Commencement</add></note></p> <p><del><gap/> <gap/><lb/><gap/> to produce inadequate sides<lb/>interest is <gap/> [1]<lb/>&#9758; <gap/> <hi rend="underline">Beginning</hi>.</del></p> <!-- to the right of last text --> <p><del>The existing system is purely <gap/><lb/>The existing system has led to <sic>encrease</sic> of publicity<lb/>and the <sic>encrease</sic> of publicity in <add>an judicature or <gap/> the court <gap/> of mankind</add> in the means of<lb/>mak </del></p> <p>Completed <add>Made up</add> the list of those <add>individuals</add> in whose instance evidence in<lb/>whatsoever way elicited affords no adequate promise of being<lb/>of use, receives <add>in regard to so <del><gap/></del> whatsoever is to be received at that same judicatory</add> the order in which the <del>different</del> evidence<lb/>of the different proposed witnesses <add>or other evidence holders</add> shall <del>be called for</del> present itself.</p> <p><note><del>[1] Propositions such as those<lb/>could not have received existence,<lb/>if the elaborately<lb/>fabricated nursery of<lb/><gap/> had been matter<lb/>of indifference.</del></note></p> <p><note><del>Officially or <gap/><lb/>distinguished excepted<lb/>individual feelings are<lb/>beneath all <gap/> <add>case</add></del></note></p> <p><del><unclear>Unaduced</unclear> with thought no <gap/> <add>the <gap/> <gap/></add> can not bind itself to circumstances.<lb/>The <hi rend="underline">existing</hi> system is not <gap/> with thought, but the<lb/>thought, being <add>the</add> opposite to <add>what the</add> appropriate <gap/> these users.<lb/>How <gap/> they must be <unclear>extended</unclear> <add>squeezed</add> into the compass of a day<lb/>that which can not put to <unclear>employ</unclear> and that which on the part of <gap/><lb/>may render <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> so ever the mass<lb/>all must come under that for that which can not but be his<lb/>at the <gap/> of <gap/> that which might be laid on the <gap/> to<lb/><gap/> or to doing <gap/> <gap/>.</del></p> <p><note>1<lb/>Order in which proposed<lb/>evidence holders shall<lb/>present themselves &#x2014; in<lb/>setting this order <del>consider<lb/>how</del>attention must be<lb/>had to the circumstances<lb/>of each individual as<lb/>in order to minimize<lb/>sufferance &amp; maximize<lb/>comfort</note></p> <p>In <add>each and</add> every individual case to make in that same<lb/>case the provision that may and ought to be made for human<lb/>failing &#x2014; <del><gap/></del> minimizing sufferance maximizing<lb/>comfort, attention to the individual circumstances of that same<lb/>case is necessary: in the case of a wrong, <add><sic>alledged</sic></add> not only to the circumstance<lb/>in which the wrong was done, but to the circumstance<lb/>pecuniary included in which the parties on both sides author<lb/>or authors of the wrong sufferer or sufferers by the wrong<lb/>and in the case of non-litigant witnesses circumstances in respect<lb/>of failure or difficulty of attendance and delivery of the evidence<lb/><note>2<lb/>Existing system <add>in this respect</add> <del>compared</del><lb/>works like a<lb/>steam engine</note><lb/>are placed.  <del>A steam engine pays</del> No attention pays <add>the piston of</add> a steam-engine<lb/>to <add>individual</add> circumstance <del><gap/></del> it moves up and down by<lb/>general rules: no such ingredient <del><gap/></del> as thought has it in the composition<lb/>of it.  In its ordinary course the existing system takes<lb/>for its guide the steam-engine, for its precedent the operation of<lb/>the steam-engine: like that it goes up and down regardless of consequence:<lb/>not that it takes not thought on any occasion; <add><del>there are</del> on no occasion does it take thought</add> but for<lb/><del>where it does the thought is worse than <gap/></del><lb/>how little then or now the feelings of the piston may have to<lb/>thought, other persons there are to whose claim to it resistance<lb/>is not possible.</p>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 11:39, 24 June 2025

Click Here To Edit

1827. Novr. 4 +
Law Amendment

ult
Propositions
Procedure
§. Initiatory Applications:
(for occurring effect) Commencement


to produce inadequate sides
interest is [1]
Beginning.

The existing system is purely
The existing system has led to encrease of publicity
and the encrease of publicity in an judicature or the court of mankind in the means of
mak

Completed Made up the list of those individuals in whose instance evidence in
whatsoever way elicited affords no adequate promise of being
of use, receives in regard to so whatsoever is to be received at that same judicatory the order in which the different evidence
of the different proposed witnesses or other evidence holders shall be called for present itself.

[1] Propositions such as those
could not have received existence,
if the elaborately
fabricated nursery of
had been matter
of indifference.

Officially or
distinguished excepted
individual feelings are
beneath all case

Unaduced with thought no the can not bind itself to circumstances.
The existing system is not with thought, but the
thought, being the opposite to what the appropriate these users.
How they must be extended squeezed into the compass of a day
that which can not put to employ and that which on the part of
may render so ever the mass
all must come under that for that which can not but be his
at the of that which might be laid on the to
or to doing .

1
Order in which proposed
evidence holders shall
present themselves — in
setting this order consider
how
attention must be
had to the circumstances
of each individual as
in order to minimize
sufferance & maximize
comfort

In each and every individual case to make in that same
case the provision that may and ought to be made for human
failing — minimizing sufferance maximizing
comfort, attention to the individual circumstances of that same
case is necessary: in the case of a wrong, alledged not only to the circumstance
in which the wrong was done, but to the circumstance
pecuniary included in which the parties on both sides author
or authors of the wrong sufferer or sufferers by the wrong
and in the case of non-litigant witnesses circumstances in respect
of failure or difficulty of attendance and delivery of the evidence
2
Existing system in this respect compared
works like a
steam engine

are placed. A steam engine pays No attention pays the piston of a steam-engine
to individual circumstance it moves up and down by
general rules: no such ingredient as thought has it in the composition
of it. In its ordinary course the existing system takes
for its guide the steam-engine, for its precedent the operation of
the steam-engine: like that it goes up and down regardless of consequence:
not that it takes not thought on any occasion; there are on no occasion does it take thought but for
where it does the thought is worse than
how little then or now the feelings of the piston may have to
thought, other persons there are to whose claim to it resistance
is not possible.



Identifier: | JB/056/210/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 56.

Date_1

1827-11-04

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-2

Box

056

Main Headings

Law Amendment

Folio number

210

Info in main headings field

Law Amendment

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

George Bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

18266

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in