JB/056/214/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/056/214/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto upload
 
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>1827. <sic>Nov<hi rend="superscript">r.</hi></sic> 4<lb/>Law Amendment.</head> <p><note>Propositions.<lb/><sic>Ch.</sic> Procedure<lb/>&sect;. next to <sic>Applicat<hi rend="superscript">n</hi> &amp; suit<lb/>Evidence-elicitation<lb/>Existing system</note></p> <p><del><add>If the need of elicitation of were apt<lb/>in an equity case, so would it be in a<lb/>Compensative case: if in a <gap/> <gap/><lb/>so in an equity case</del></add></p>  <p><note>6<lb/>Existing system<lb/>exclusion of litigant<lb/>witnesses</note></p> <p>Against evidence of litigant witnesses, the existing system<lb/>shuts a <sic>premptry</sic> door. <foreign>Nemo debet esse <unclear>testes</unclear> in propria"</foreign>cause says the oracle.  <del>Thus <gap/><del> against what witness it is<lb/><gap/>? against him who is most likely to know most about<lb/>the matter, and whose narrative <del>if</del> in so far as fable is<lb/>least likely to be deceptive: for by a <add>non</add> litigant witness may be<lb/>possessed an interest in the suit an interest more valuable than<lb/>that of <del>th</del> either litigant and at the same time unknown and<lb/>undiscoverable: no eye so blind as not to be open to the law<lb/>under which is delivered whatsoever is delivered by a party in<lb/>the suit.</p>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 10:54, 2 July 2025

Click Here To Edit

1827. Novr. 4
Law Amendment.

Propositions.
Ch. Procedure
§. next to <sic>Applicatn & suit
Evidence-elicitation
Existing system

<add>If the need of elicitation of were apt
in an equity case, so would it be in a
Compensative case: if in a
so in an equity case
</add>

6
Existing system
exclusion of litigant
witnesses

Against evidence of litigant witnesses, the existing system
shuts a premptry door. Nemo debet esse testes in propria"cause says the oracle. Thus against what witness it is
? against him who is most likely to know most about
the matter, and whose narrative if
in so far as fable is
least likely to be deceptive: for by a non litigant witness may be
possessed an interest in the suit an interest more valuable than
that of th either litigant and at the same time unknown and
undiscoverable: no eye so blind as not to be open to the law
under which is delivered whatsoever is delivered by a party in
the suit.




Identifier: | JB/056/214/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 56.

Date_1

1827-11-04

Marginal Summary Numbering

6-7

Box

056

Main Headings

Law Amendment

Folio number

214

Info in main headings field

Law Amendment

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

C2 / C1

Penner

Watermarks

BROCKLESBY & MORBEY 1827

Marginals

George Bentham

Paper Producer

Edmund Henry Barker

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1827

Notes public

ID Number

18270

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in