JB/056/217/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/056/217/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto upload
 
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>1827. <sic>Nov<hi rend="superscript">r.</hi></sic> 4<lb/>Law Amendment.</head> <p><note><sic>ult</sic><lb/>Propositions<lb/><sic>Ch.</sic> Procedure<lb/>&sect;&sect; Next to <sic>Applic<hi rend="superscript">n</hi></sic> &amp; Suits<lb/>Evidence -elicitation</note>?</p> <p><add>Subpoena obtains <gap/> in few<lb/>vexation to witnesses <gap/> to<lb/><gap/> <gap/> <gap/> to lawyer profitable<lb/>in <gap/> <gap/></add></p> <!-- to the right of this text --> Interrogated by the Attorney the evidence<lb/>witness <gap/> to feel benefit of<lb/>the medicants <gap/></add></p> <p><note>13<lb/>Investigatory evidence<lb/><del>all</del> employed for<lb/>punishment of felonies<lb/>refused in all other<lb/><del>criminal <gap/></del> common<lb/>law cases</note></p> <p>To the investigatory mode of elicitation employment is<lb/>given in suits <add>carried on in the criminal form</add> for punishment of Offences <sic>stiled</sic> felonies, and suits<lb/>carried on in the criminal form for offences <del>called breaches of the <gap/></del> <add><sic>stiled</sic></add><lb/>stiled in the language of legal <gap/> branches of the power given<lb/>in these sorts of suits: to all others refused to all others given,<lb/>where the fact to be ascertained is a cut or a blow: refused where it<lb/>is the collative or ablative fact by which the title to a <add><gap/></add> Dukedom<lb/>with thousands a year in any number is to be established or done<lb/>away.</p> <p><note>14<lb/>Refused in Equity</note></p> <p>Refused <del>by</del> to be carried on by Judge, <add>with <del>the</del> ample authority</add> the investigation<lb/>is left to be performed by <del>the</del> professional assistant of parties with<lb/><gap/> consequences in Equity with no exception, at Common<lb/>Law with no exception but as above no witnesses have you<lb/>but those <add>of</add> whose testimony <del>is deigned</del> <add>the comparative untrustworthiness is <gap/></add> by the name given the<lb/>willing witnesses: the body of the evidence regularly incompetent<lb/>and in such sort <sic>incompleat</sic>, as to be through partial affection<lb/><unclear>dueplious</unclear></p> <p><note>15<lb/>Under existing system<lb/><add>useless</add> mode of evidence compelling<lb/>as superabundant<lb/>as the needful is<lb/>scanty.</note></p> <p>Mode of compelling <!-- brackets in pencil --> [the] elicitation of evidence<lb/>If <del>by</del> <add>for <gap/> <gap/></add> <del>superfluity <gap/> and <gap/></del> <add>atonement</add> awards could be made<lb/>by <sic>remedience</sic> of <del>the</del> for the needful by the useless if for<lb/>scantiness of the needful by abundance of the useless the mode<lb/>employed by the existing might be <add>in part of applied</add> upon to par with that <del><gap/><lb/>be</del> employed in the proposed system.</p> <p><gap/> of securing the exhibition of evidence: that is to<lb/>say of such evidence as is not, as above excluded that which<lb/>is employed by the existing system is it rightly adapted to its<lb/>professed purpose?  Yes if <del>by</del> for <add>for the deficiency left by</add> scantiness of the needful <del><gap/></del> <add><gap/></add><lb/><del>can <gap/> <add>in <gap/></add></del> supply appropriate and adequate can be <add>is</add> afforded<lb/>by exuberance without limit of whatever is most useless.</p>
 
 


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 17:17, 6 July 2025

Click Here To Edit

1827. Novr. 4
Law Amendment.

ult
Propositions
Ch. Procedure
§§ Next to Applicn & Suits
Evidence -elicitation
?

Subpoena obtains in few
vexation to witnesses to
to lawyer profitable
in

Interrogated by the Attorney the evidence
witness to feel benefit of
the medicants </add>

13
Investigatory evidence
all employed for
punishment of felonies
refused in all other
criminal common
law cases

To the investigatory mode of elicitation employment is
given in suits carried on in the criminal form for punishment of Offences stiled felonies, and suits
carried on in the criminal form for offences called breaches of the stiled
stiled in the language of legal branches of the power given
in these sorts of suits: to all others refused to all others given,
where the fact to be ascertained is a cut or a blow: refused where it
is the collative or ablative fact by which the title to a Dukedom
with thousands a year in any number is to be established or done
away.

14
Refused in Equity

Refused by to be carried on by Judge, with the ample authority the investigation
is left to be performed by the professional assistant of parties with
consequences in Equity with no exception, at Common
Law with no exception but as above no witnesses have you
but those of whose testimony is deigned the comparative untrustworthiness is by the name given the
willing witnesses: the body of the evidence regularly incompetent
and in such sort incompleat, as to be through partial affection
dueplious

15
Under existing system
useless mode of evidence compelling
as superabundant
as the needful is
scanty.

Mode of compelling [the] elicitation of evidence
If by for superfluity and atonement awards could be made
by remedience of the for the needful by the useless if for
scantiness of the needful by abundance of the useless the mode
employed by the existing might be in part of applied upon to par with that
be
employed in the proposed system.

of securing the exhibition of evidence: that is to
say of such evidence as is not, as above excluded that which
is employed by the existing system is it rightly adapted to its
professed purpose? Yes if by for for the deficiency left by scantiness of the needful
can in supply appropriate and adequate can be is afforded
by exuberance without limit of whatever is most useless.



Identifier: | JB/056/217/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 56.

Date_1

1827-11-04

Marginal Summary Numbering

13-15

Box

056

Main Headings

Law Amendment

Folio number

217

Info in main headings field

Law Amendment

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

C5 / C3 / or C1*

Penner

Watermarks

BROCKLESBY & MORBEY 1827

Marginals

George Bentham

Paper Producer

Edmund Henry Barker

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1827

Notes public

ID Number

18273

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in