JB/056/220/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/056/220/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head>1827. <sic><del>Oct<hi rend="superscript">r.</hi></del> Nov<hi rend="superscript">r.</hi></sic> 4<lb/><add>Law amendment</add> <del>Constitutional Code</del></head> <p><note><sic>ult</sic><lb/><del>Ch</del> Propositions<lb/><del>Ch</del> Procedure<lb/>&sect; after Application &amp; suits<lb/>Evidence elicitation<lb/>Existing System</note></p> <p><note>6<lb/>Between correct &amp;<lb/>incorrect veracious<lb/>&amp; mendacious no<lb/>difference made</note></p> <p>Correct or incorrect, mendacious <del>or only <gap/></del> <gap/><lb/>through mendacity, culpable <gap/> or blameless error &#x2014; <del>successful<lb/>or unsuccessful or the <gap/></del> no difference to the purpose<lb?>of the use of law is made by any of these circumstances<lb/>Not so whatever the chase after evidence be or be not attended with<lb/>success, or what <gap/> <gap/> <add><gap/></add> <gap/> the same purpose, the <gap/><lb/>of it: that is to say the assurance given that the proposed witness<lb/><del><gap/></del> narrator or evidence holder will at the point <add>when the time comes</add>he is real <gap/>.<lb/>For frown <add>fallen</add> out of <del>all his</del> every step he takes every word he speaks<lb?>or hears every word he writes and every word he <gap/><lb/><gap/> the Judge sue <add>as above/add> his duty <del>as the Judge</del> lost to the partnership<lb/><would have been all these fees.</p> <p><note>7<lb/>Under the proposed<lb/>system instrument<lb/>for obtaining attendance<lb/>for evidence<lb/>delivery a summons<lb/>or prehension as the<lb/>case may require.</note></p> <p>Under the proposed system, as above, instrument of obtaining<lb/>attendance for delivery of evidence, a summons or a prehensive warrant<lb/>as the exigency of the case may require.  Behold in the <add>Turn now to</add><lb/><del><gap/> provided</del> existing system <add>in the <gap/></add> the instrument <del>si</del> is employed <add>employed by it</add><lb/>By a summons is understood <add>made</add> by every body what is intended<lb/>to be understood by it: by a prehensive warrant is understood<lb/>by every body what is meant to be understood by it: at any<lb/>rate when it is understood that for exclusion of ambiguity<lb/><del> the <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> is <gap/><gap/></del> the word apprehension
<head>1827. <sic><del>Oct<hi rend="superscript">r.</hi></del> Nov<hi rend="superscript">r.</hi></sic> 4<lb/><add>Law Amendment</add> <del>Constitutional Code</del></head> <p><note><sic>ult</sic><lb/><del>Ch</del> Propositions<lb/><del>Ch</del> Procedure<lb/>&sect; After Application &amp; Suits<lb/>Evidence elicitation<lb/>Existing System</note></p> <p><note>6<lb/>Between correct &amp;<lb/>incorrect veracious<lb/>&amp; mendacious no<lb/>difference made</note></p> <p>Correct or incorrect, mendacious <del>or only <gap/></del> <gap/><lb/>through mendacity, culpable <gap/> or blameless error &#x2014; <del>successful<lb/>or unsuccessful or the <gap/></del> no difference to the purpose<lb?>of the use of law is made by any of these circumstances<lb/>Not so whatever the chase after evidence be or be not attended with<lb/>success, or what <gap/> <gap/> <add><gap/></add> <gap/> the same purpose, the <gap/><lb/>of it: that is to say the assurance given that the proposed witness<lb/><del><gap/></del> narrator or evidence holder will at the point <add>when the time comes</add>he is real <gap/>.<lb/>For frown <add>fallen</add> out of <del>all his</del> every step he takes every word he speaks<lb?>or hears every word he writes and every word he <gap/><lb/><gap/> the Judge sue <add>as above/add> his duty <del>as the Judge</del> lost to the partnership<lb/><would have been all these fees.</p> <p><note>7<lb/>Under the proposed<lb/>system instrument<lb/>for obtaining attendance<lb/>for evidence<lb/>delivery a summons<lb/>or prehension as the<lb/>case may require.</note></p> <p>Under the proposed system, as above, instrument of obtaining<lb/>attendance for delivery of evidence, a summons or a prehensive warrant<lb/>as the exigency of the case may require.  Behold in the <add>Turn now to</add><lb/><del><gap/> provided</del> existing system <add>in the <gap/></add> the instrument <del>si</del> is employed <add>employed by it</add><lb/>By a summons is understood <add>made</add> by every body what is intended<lb/>to be understood by it: by a prehensive warrant is understood<lb/>by every body what is meant to be understood by it: at any<lb/>rate when it is understood that for exclusion of ambiguity<lb/><del> the <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> is <gap/><gap/></del> the word apprehension<lb/>is here as in latin left <gap/> by <gap/> to the purpose<lb/>unless syllable ap.  <del>By</del> <add>True</add> the existing system script of latin sub<lb/>power <del>nothing <gap/> <gap/><gap/></del> by any <del>man</del> hand <del><gap/></del> unimpregnated<lb/>with what in law goes by the name of <hi rend="underline">larceny</hi><lb/>can any thing be understood.  Sub power is made a penalty<lb/>under the <del><gap/></del> terms of the same penalty what it is that is expected<lb/>to be done, as to this point it says nothing <add>what is said is nothing</add>.</p> <p>On <del>reading it <gap/><del> looking into the <gap/> of sale to his <gap/><lb/>the <gap/> <del><gap/></del> between who never then paid in his life<lb/><gap/> <gap/> so much as he paid reads that <del>by a <gap/></del> able or<lb/><gap/> should be <add>at the commanded hour</add> paid to he whom he is considered to be a <gap/><lb/>paid neither more or less will be the <gap/> <del><gap/></del> to which he <gap/><lb/>will say to himself: no <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> to pay.  Shall I then<lb/>?. Yes, if it suits me: if not, not.</p>
 
 


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 17:03, 4 August 2025

Click Here To Edit

1827. Octr. Novr. 4
Law Amendment Constitutional Code

ult
Ch Propositions
Ch Procedure
§ After Application & Suits
Evidence elicitation
Existing System

6
Between correct &
incorrect veracious
& mendacious no
difference made

Correct or incorrect, mendacious or only
through mendacity, culpable or blameless error — successful
or unsuccessful or the
no difference to the purpose<lb?>of the use of law is made by any of these circumstances
Not so whatever the chase after evidence be or be not attended with
success, or what the same purpose, the
of it: that is to say the assurance given that the proposed witness
narrator or evidence holder will at the point when the time comeshe is real .
For frown fallen out of all his every step he takes every word he speaks<lb?>or hears every word he writes and every word he
the Judge sue as above/add> his duty as the Judge lost to the partnership
<would have been all these fees.

7
Under the proposed
system instrument
for obtaining attendance
for evidence
delivery a summons
or prehension as the
case may require.

Under the proposed system, as above, instrument of obtaining
attendance for delivery of evidence, a summons or a prehensive warrant
as the exigency of the case may require. Behold in the <add>Turn now to
provided existing system in the the instrument si is employed employed by it
By a summons is understood made by every body what is intended
to be understood by it: by a prehensive warrant is understood
by every body what is meant to be understood by it: at any
rate when it is understood that for exclusion of ambiguity
the is the word apprehension
is here as in latin left by to the purpose
unless syllable ap. By True the existing system script of latin sub
power nothing by any man hand unimpregnated
with what in law goes by the name of larceny
can any thing be understood. Sub power is made a penalty
under the terms of the same penalty what it is that is expected
to be done, as to this point it says nothing what is said is nothing.

On reading it looking into the of sale to his
the
between who never then paid in his life
so much as he paid reads that by a able or
should be at the commanded hour paid to he whom he is considered to be a
paid neither more or less will be the to which he
will say to himself: no to pay. Shall I then
?. Yes, if it suits me: if not, not.



Identifier: | JB/056/220/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 56.

Date_1

1827-11-04

Marginal Summary Numbering

6-8

Box

056

Main Headings

Law Amendment

Folio number

220

Info in main headings field

Law Amendment

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

C8 / C7 / E3?

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

George Bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

18276

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in