JB/056/222/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/056/222/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto upload
 
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>1827. <sic>Nov<hi rend="superscript">r.</hi></sic> 4<lb/>Law Amendment.</head> <p><note><sic>ult</sic><lb/>propositions<lb/><sic.ch.</sic> Procedure<lb/>&sect; Evidence<lb/>elicitation oral <unclear>&amp;c</unclear></note></p> <p><del><gap/>1. <gap/> 2. incidental</del></p> <p><gap/> <gap/> <gap/><lb/>Mode of elicitation <gap/> <gap/> if oral <gap/>, the Judicatory first applied to <gap/> <gap/></del></p> <p><note>11<lb/>Elicitation 1 oral<lb/>2 epistolary</note></p> <p><note>12<lb/>Cases<lb/>for application of<lb/>epistolary 1 oral not<lb/>procurable 2 oral<lb/>not needful</note></p> <p>Form of discourse <add><unclear>attendance</unclear></add> employed in elicitation, oral or epistolary:<lb/>case for the application of epistolary, two. 1. <del><gap/></del attendance,<lb/>for the purpose of oral, not procurable: 2. the fact to be spoken<lb/>be in such sort simple, that for <del>the</del>securing correctness and appropriate<lb/><sic>compleatness</sic> and veracity <add>verity of statement</add> interrogation and contention will<lb/>not be needful.  these cases provided for as far as may be, by<lb/><add><sic>preappointed</sic> and</add> printed forms.  Epistolary elicitation <add>in the epistolary form</add> in no case but <del>subject so</del> <add>under the security<lb/>afforded <del>by</del> for veracity</add> eventual <gap/> in the oral <add><gap/></add> mode.</p> <p><note>13<lb/>For oral elicitation<lb/>Judicatory the originating</note></p> <p>For oral elicitation Judicatory, the originating or <del>the</del> an<lb/>incidental one <del>originating</del> <gap/> the originating; <gap/>,<lb/>the incidental.</note></p> <p><del>Thus the <gap/> <del> <add>constituting</add> is the result of the <gap/><lb/><gap/> by the applicant <gap/> <gap/></del></p> <p><note>14<lb/>Basis of all ulterior<lb?>evidence the result<lb/>of the first oral<lb/>examination</note></p> <p>Basis of all ulterior <del><gap/></del> evidence and all ulterior<lb/>procedure, the result of the examination undergone in the oral form<lb/>by the applicant, in the originating Judicatory</p> <p><note>15<lb/>For ulterior elicitation<lb/>Judges optional courses<lb/>three<lb/>1 Oral in originating<lb/>Judicatory<lb/>2 Oral in incidental<lb/>Judicatory<lb/>3 Epistolary from<lb/>originating Judicatory</note></p> <p>As to <add>all</add> such ulterior evidence <!-- brackets in pencil --> del>[if any] and</del> that is to<lb/>say as top each supposed evidence-holder and proposed evidence<lb/>furnisher; Judge's optimal courses three. 1. Oral <del>examination</del> elicitation<lb/>in the originating judicatory 2 Oral elicitation in an incidental<lb/>Judicatory; 3 Epistolary elicitation emanating from the<lb/>originating Judicatory.</p>
 
 


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 09:42, 12 August 2025

Click Here To Edit

1827. Novr. 4
Law Amendment.

ult
propositions
<sic.ch.</sic> Procedure
§ Evidence
elicitation oral &c

1. 2. incidental


Mode of elicitation if oral , the Judicatory first applied to

11
Elicitation 1 oral
2 epistolary

12
Cases
for application of
epistolary 1 oral not
procurable 2 oral
not needful

Form of discourse attendance employed in elicitation, oral or epistolary:
case for the application of epistolary, two. 1. </del attendance,
for the purpose of oral, not procurable: 2. the fact to be spoken
be in such sort simple, that for the
securing correctness and appropriate
compleatness and veracity verity of statement interrogation and contention will
not be needful. these cases provided for as far as may be, by
preappointed and printed forms. Epistolary elicitation in the epistolary form in no case but subject so under the security
afforded by for veracity
eventual in the oral mode.

13
For oral elicitation
Judicatory the originating

For oral elicitation Judicatory, the originating or the an
incidental one originating the originating; ,
the incidental.</note>

Thus the constituting is the result of the
by the applicant

14
Basis of all ulterior<lb?>evidence the result
of the first oral
examination

Basis of all ulterior evidence and all ulterior
procedure, the result of the examination undergone in the oral form
by the applicant, in the originating Judicatory

15
For ulterior elicitation
Judges optional courses
three
1 Oral in originating
Judicatory
2 Oral in incidental
Judicatory
3 Epistolary from
originating Judicatory

As to all such ulterior evidence del>[if any] and that is to
say as top each supposed evidence-holder and proposed evidence
furnisher; Judge's optimal courses three. 1. Oral examination elicitation
in the originating judicatory 2 Oral elicitation in an incidental
Judicatory; 3 Epistolary elicitation emanating from the
originating Judicatory.



Identifier: | JB/056/222/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 56.

Date_1

1827-11-04

Marginal Summary Numbering

11-16

Box

056

Main Headings

Law Amendment

Folio number

222

Info in main headings field

Law Amendment

Image

001

Titles

Note (a)

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

E5?

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

George Bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

18278

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in