JB/056/234/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/056/234/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto upload
 
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>1827. <sic>Nov<hi rend="superscript">r.</hi></sic> 5 +<lb/>Law Amendment</head> <p><note>Propositions<lb/><sic>Ch</sic> Procedure<lb/>Existing System<lb/>Equity delay</note></p> <p><note>1<lb/>Erroneous supposition.<lb/>Delay <add>not</add> more necessary<lb/>in equity than other Suits</note></p> <p><del><gap/></del> On the present occasion, <gap/> subject matter of <sic>compleat</sic><lb/><del>a</del> delay: <del.<gap/></del> Judicatory <del><gap/></del> A<dd>most</add> complained of on this score the <add>Equity</add> Courts <del>the<lb/>?Equity</del>.<!-- brackets in pencil --> [Excuse, yes: to delay still more: of the cause of this<lb/>distraction honestly] On <add>What on</add> all hands is admitted <add>is &#x2014;</add> that in the Equity<lb/>Court the quantity <add>length</add. of delay is matter for ,del.<gap/></del> <add>severe</add> and just report.  But<lb/>by <gap/> it is contended that in <gap/> proceeding, delay equal is not much <del><gap/></del> <add>inferior</add> to that which <del>actully</del> <add>actually</add> has<lb/>place or mandate</p> <p><del>Suits <gap/> <gap/> to be <gap/>, for the several purpose<lb/>there</del></p> <p><note>2<lb/><del><gap/></del> Only in so far<lb/>as suits continuous by<lb/>nature <del>are</del> <sic>cognizanced</sic><lb/>by Equity courts</note></p> <p>Suits <gap/> suits <gap/>: for holding up the matter<lb/>in question in a clear point of view, this distinction is <add>a precious and indispensable</add> view<lb/><gap/> by accident <del>and</del> every <gap/> suit <del>if</del> is liable to<lb/>be witness the <unclear>eloquent</unclear> of evidence  For the length of the time during<lb/>which on the occasion of any suit it may happen to see a <gap/><lb/>of evidence altogether indispensable <add>necessary to Justice</add> to be unforthcoming unprocurable<lb/>no hands can be applied: half a day or half a<lb/><gap/></p> <p><note>3<lb/>Those left to Equity,<lb/>because Common Law<lb/>has no machinery applicable<lb/>to them.</note></p> <p>Because the sort of suits continuous by nature.  For sake of<lb/>these sort the Common Law Courts by means of the course of practice<lb/>pursued by them <add>from the beginning of time the <gap/> <gap/><a/dd> being either absolutely or comparatively incapable<lb/><del>have</del> to the <del><gap/></del> Equity Courts it is suits continue by <add>are those under the cognizance of the</add><lb/>nature laws follow those suits have fallen whole are <gap/> by<lb/>nature.</p> 
 
 


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 10:47, 29 August 2025

Click Here To Edit

1827. Novr. 5 +
Law Amendment

Propositions
Ch Procedure
Existing System
Equity delay

1
Erroneous supposition.
Delay not more necessary
in equity than other Suits

On the present occasion, subject matter of compleat
a delay: <del. Judicatory A

most</add> complained of on this score the Equity Courts the
?Equity
. [Excuse, yes: to delay still more: of the cause of this
distraction honestly] On What on all hands is admitted is — that in the Equity
Court the quantity length</add. of delay is matter for ,del. <add>severe and just report. But
by it is contended that in proceeding, delay equal is not much inferior to that which actully actually has
place or mandate

Suits to be , for the several purpose
there

2
Only in so far
as suits continuous by
nature are cognizanced
by Equity courts

Suits suits : for holding up the matter
in question in a clear point of view, this distinction is a precious and indispensable view
by accident and every suit if is liable to
be witness the eloquent of evidence For the length of the time during
which on the occasion of any suit it may happen to see a
of evidence altogether indispensable necessary to Justice to be unforthcoming unprocurable
no hands can be applied: half a day or half a

3
Those left to Equity,
because Common Law
has no machinery applicable
to them.

Because the sort of suits continuous by nature. For sake of
these sort the Common Law Courts by means of the course of practice
pursued by them from the beginning of time the <a/dd> being either absolutely or comparatively incapable
have to the Equity Courts it is suits continue by <add>are those under the cognizance of the

nature laws follow those suits have fallen whole are by
nature.



Identifier: | JB/056/234/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 56.

Date_1

1827-11-05

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-4

Box

056

Main Headings

Law Amendment

Folio number

234

Info in main headings field

Law Amendment

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

C1 / E1

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

18290

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in