JB/056/247/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/056/247/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head>1828 July 20<lb/>Judicial Establishment or Procedure Code.</head> <p><note>Preface ?</note></p> <p><note>9<lb/>Consequence of fee payment<lb/>1. Multiplication of fee-yielding<lb/>suits.<lb/>2/ Multiplication of occasions<lb/>for fees in each<lb/>suit.</note></p> <p>From this number of payments resulted one most important<lb/>consequence: <del><gap/> <gap/></del> consequence <del>of <add>against</add> which the eyes<lb/>of lawyers have <gap/> discourse of lawyers <gap/></del><lb/>to which <gap/> were widely the eyes of lawyers, can not<lb/>have been open their prayers <add>discourses</add> and pens have at all<lb/>times been <sic>compleatly</sic> closed, nor are the eyes of<lb/>non lawyers sufficiently open to it.  the consequence is &#x2014;<lb/>this or that not with the greater the number of suits<lb/>cognizance can thus be <gap/> of, but the greater the number<lb/>of the occasions on which in the instance of <del><gap/></del> each<lb/>suit something can be found to be done, the greater <add>will be</add> the<lb/>mass of money <add>retribution received</add> pocketed by each Judge at the years end.</p> <!-- paragraph mark --> <p><note>10<lb/>Effect of indecision applying<lb/>to multiplication of suits,<lb/>was between <gap/><lb/>and Judicatory</note></p> <p><!-- brackets in pencil -->[How any two branches of judicial industry<lb/>[and one species of intention] are employed in the <del>se</del><lb/>giving <gap/> to the number of occasions on which in the course<lb/>of each suit fees costs are exacted, the other in giving<lb/><sic>encrease</sic. to the number of suits.  In so far as the<lb/><del><gap/></del> commencement of a suit was on the part of the<lb/>suitor voluntary, no <sic>encrease</sic> could be given to the<lb/>number of the suits.  <del><gap/></del> in the way therefore no <del>ad</del><lb/><sic>encrease</sic> on money could be made by any one Judge or<lb/>set of Judges.</p> <!-- paragraph mark --> <p><note>11<lb/>Against every Judge every<lb/>suitor helpless</note></p> <p><add>All</add> Suitors <add>against all Judges</add> on both sides of the suit were <sic>compleatly</sic> helpless:</p> <!-- paragraph mark --> <p><note>12<lb/>Against encroachment by<lb/>brother Judge, every<lb/>Judge had the King to<lb/>appeal to</note></p>  <p><del>but against</del> not so one Judge is set of<lb/>Judge against another.  If on this or any <del>ser</del> other service<lb/>any one Judge or set of Judges had complaint to enter against<lb/>any other, <add>in the King it was that</add> they placed all of them their common and only<lb/>common Judge.</p> <!-- paragraph mark --> <p><note>13<lb/>King ignorant and<lb/>otherwise occupied</note></p> <p>Meantime the King at all times an<lb/>ignorant barbarian was at times to such a degree engaged<lb/><add>in disputes and</add> with wars and disputes with <gap/> not in authority under<lb/>him that he is a subject this dry and difficult he had little<lb/>or no attention to bestow.</p>
<head>1828 July 20<lb/>Judicial Establishment or Procedure Code.</head> <p><note>Preface ?</note></p> <p><note>9<lb/>Consequence of fee payment<lb/>1. Multiplication of fee-yielding<lb/>suits.<lb/>2. Multiplication of occasions<lb/>for fees in each<lb/>suit.</note></p> <p>From this number of payments resulted one most important<lb/>consequence: <del><gap/> <gap/></del> consequence <del>of <add>against</add> which the eyes<lb/>of lawyers have <gap/> discourse of lawyers <gap/></del><lb/>to what knows how widely the eyes of lawyers, can not<lb/>to have been open their prayers <add>discourses</add> and pens have at all<lb/>times been <sic>compleatly</sic> closed, nor are the eyes of<lb/>non lawyers sufficiently open to it.  The consequence is &#x2014;<lb/>that is that not with the greater the number of suits<lb/>cognizance can thus be obtained of, but the greater the number<lb/>of the occasions on which in the instance of <del><gap/></del> each<lb/>suit something can be found to be done, the greater <add>will be</add> the<lb/>mass of money <add>retribution received</add> pocketed by each Judge at the years end.</p> <!-- paragraph mark --> <p><note>10<lb/>Effect of indecision applying<lb/>to multiplication of suits,<lb/>was between Judicatory<lb/>and Judicatory</note></p> <p><!-- brackets in pencil -->[Hence any two branches of judicial industry<lb/>[and one species of intention] are employed in the <del>se</del><lb/>giving <sic>encrease</sic> to the number of occasions on which in the course<lb/>of each suit fees could be exacted, the other in giving<lb/><sic>encrease</sic> to the number of suits.  In so far as the<lb/><del><gap/></del> commencement of a suit was on the part of the<lb/>suitor voluntary, no <sic>encrease</sic> could be given to the<lb/>number of the suits.  <del><gap/></del> In this way therefore no <del>ad</del><lb/><sic>encrease</sic> of money could be made by any one Judge or<lb/>set of Judges but at the <sic>expence</sic> of one other Judge or<lb/>set of Judges.</p> <!-- paragraph mark --> <p><note>11<lb/>Against every Judge, every<lb/>suitor helpless</note></p> <p><add>All</add> Suitors <add>against all Judges</add> on both sides of the suit were <sic>compleatly</sic> helpless:</p> <!-- paragraph mark --> <p><note>12<lb/>Against encroachment by<lb/>brother Judge, every<lb/>Judge had the King to<lb/>appeal to</note></p>  <p><del>but against</del> not so one Judge or set of<lb/>Judges against another.  If on this or any <del>ser</del> other service<lb/>any one Judge or set of Judges had complaint to enter against<lb/>any other, <add>in the King it was that</add> they placed all of them their common and only<lb/>common Judge.</p> <!-- paragraph mark --> <p><note>13<lb/>King ignorant and<lb/>otherwise occupied</note></p> <p>Meantime the King at all times an<lb/>ignorant barbarian was at times to such a degree engaged<lb/><add>in disputation and</add> with wars and disputes with <gap/> not in authority under<lb/>him that <del>he</del> on a subject this dry and difficult he had little<lb/>or no attention to bestow.</p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 15:49, 10 September 2025

Click Here To Edit

1828 July 20
Judicial Establishment or Procedure Code.

Preface ?

9
Consequence of fee payment
1. Multiplication of fee-yielding
suits.
2. Multiplication of occasions
for fees in each
suit.

From this number of payments resulted one most important
consequence: consequence of against which the eyes
of lawyers have discourse of lawyers

to what knows how widely the eyes of lawyers, can not
to have been open their prayers discourses and pens have at all
times been compleatly closed, nor are the eyes of
non lawyers sufficiently open to it. The consequence is —
that is that not with the greater the number of suits
cognizance can thus be obtained of, but the greater the number
of the occasions on which in the instance of each
suit something can be found to be done, the greater will be the
mass of money retribution received pocketed by each Judge at the years end.

10
Effect of indecision applying
to multiplication of suits,
was between Judicatory
and Judicatory

[Hence any two branches of judicial industry
[and one species of intention] are employed in the se
giving encrease to the number of occasions on which in the course
of each suit fees could be exacted, the other in giving
encrease to the number of suits. In so far as the
commencement of a suit was on the part of the
suitor voluntary, no encrease could be given to the
number of the suits. In this way therefore no ad
encrease of money could be made by any one Judge or
set of Judges but at the expence of one other Judge or
set of Judges.

11
Against every Judge, every
suitor helpless

All Suitors against all Judges on both sides of the suit were compleatly helpless:

12
Against encroachment by
brother Judge, every
Judge had the King to
appeal to

but against not so one Judge or set of
Judges against another. If on this or any ser other service
any one Judge or set of Judges had complaint to enter against
any other, in the King it was that they placed all of them their common and only
common Judge.

13
King ignorant and
otherwise occupied

Meantime the King at all times an
ignorant barbarian was at times to such a degree engaged
in disputation and with wars and disputes with not in authority under
him that he on a subject this dry and difficult he had little
or no attention to bestow.



Identifier: | JB/056/247/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 56.

Date_1

1828-07-20

Marginal Summary Numbering

9-13

Box

056

Main Headings

Procedure Code

Folio number

247

Info in main headings field

Judicial Establishment or Procedure Code

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

C3 / F3

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

18303

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in