JB/061/013/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/061/013/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto upload
 
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>1827. <sic>Dec<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic>16<lb/>Law Amendment.</head> <p><note>Propositions.<lb/>Beginning</note></p> <p><note>33<lb/>2 Where no <add>special</add> sinister<lb/>interest &#x2014; general interest<lb/>to do right</note></p> <p>2 Whatsoever <del>it was not</del> in his calculation, it was<lb/>not by some special sinister and preponderant interest rendered<lb/>upon the whole his interest to do wrong, it was his<lb/>interest to do right.  Great <add>Vast</add> as was their power &#x2014; <del><gap/></del> cast,<lb/>and in the ordinary state of things irresistible and uncontracted<lb/>by far of punishment <del>at any other hands</del> <add>from any other source</add> than the<lb/>will of <del>those</del> parties <add>the great parties</add> in sinister interest, still the reputation<lb/>of doing right <del>was no</del> could not naturally be<lb/>to them <add>in their eyes</add> a matter of absolute indifference <Add>of which the Monarch was seen or supposed to be the matter</add>.  Oppression had<lb/><add>every now <del>and the</del> now and then produced <del><gap/></del> insurrection against the<lb/>authority of the Monarch; oppression of which they were<lb/>seen or supposed to be the authors, might if carried on <add>altogether</add> without<lb/>restraint produce insurrection against theirs.  In <add>About<lb/>the time</add> the reign of Edward the second symptoms appear of a<lb/>suspicion as having gained ground of their <del>being <gap/></del> <add>conduct having</add> to a prevailing degree been determined by <gap/><lb/>little conducive to the ends of justice.  In the <foreign>Maison<lb/>de Justice</foreign> a book the date of which is <gap/> reference<lb/>to that reign, occurs a story of two Judges said to have<lb/>been hanged by King Alfred.  <del>The</del> For correctness this anecdote<lb/>would make no bad match for the genuine history of Geoffrey<lb/>of Monmouth. But <del><gap/> <gap/> <gap/></del> the language being the Law<lb/>French the writer consequently &#x2014; <gap/> <del><gap/></del> in the sinister<lb/>interest &#x2014; a portion in the form of Judge and <sic>C<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic> it presents<lb/>no <gap/> table to be considered as evidence<lb/>of the temper of the time &#x2014; of the <add>resentment <gap/> or</add> disposition of the people<lb/>at large by the conduct of these arbiters of their fate.</p>
 
 


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 13:24, 3 October 2025

Click Here To Edit

1827. Decr16
Law Amendment.

Propositions.
Beginning

33
2 Where no special sinister
interest — general interest
to do right

2 Whatsoever it was not in his calculation, it was
not by some special sinister and preponderant interest rendered
upon the whole his interest to do wrong, it was his
interest to do right. Great Vast as was their power — cast,
and in the ordinary state of things irresistible and uncontracted
by far of punishment at any other hands from any other source than the
will of those parties the great parties in sinister interest, still the reputation
of doing right was no could not naturally be
to them in their eyes a matter of absolute indifference of which the Monarch was seen or supposed to be the matter. Oppression had
every now and the now and then produced insurrection against the
authority of the Monarch; oppression of which they were
seen or supposed to be the authors, might if carried on <add>altogether
without
restraint produce insurrection against theirs. In About
the time
the reign of Edward the second symptoms appear of a
suspicion as having gained ground of their being conduct having to a prevailing degree been determined by
little conducive to the ends of justice. In the Maison
de Justice
a book the date of which is reference
to that reign, occurs a story of two Judges said to have
been hanged by King Alfred. The For correctness this anecdote
would make no bad match for the genuine history of Geoffrey
of Monmouth. But the language being the Law
French the writer consequently — in the sinister
interest — a portion in the form of Judge and Co it presents
no table to be considered as evidence
of the temper of the time — of the resentment or disposition of the people
at large by the conduct of these arbiters of their fate.



Identifier: | JB/061/013/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 61.

Date_1

1827-12-16

Marginal Summary Numbering

33

Box

061

Main Headings

Law Amendment; Penal Code

Folio number

013

Info in main headings field

Law Amendment

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

C2 / D8 / E8

Penner

Watermarks

J WHATMAN TURKEY MILL 1827

Marginals

George Bentham

Paper Producer

Jonathan Blenman

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1827

Notes public

ID Number

19702

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in