JB/071/112/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/071/112/002: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
JFoxe (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/071/112/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/071/112/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<pb/>
 
<head>6. C</head>
 
<head>Of Family Imposture.</head>
 
<p>opposite channels, is capable of producing such a variety of distress<lb/>
as it would take a Volume to delineate.</p>
 
<p><note>2. Because it would not be worth while to make distinctions.</note> 2. Because if there are some cases in which a less punishment<lb/>
might suffice, the offence will always be so rare, that the<lb/>
provisions necessary for the purpose of excepting them would<lb/>
not pay the price of the room they would occupy in the Code.</p>
 
<p>Quest. II. Why the bringing up of Adulterous Issue as<lb/>
Lawful is not punished as Family Imposture?</p>
 
<head>Reasons.</head>
 
<p><note>1. Because punishment in the former case would produce more mischief than it would prevent.</note> 1. Because punishment if slight would be <hi rend='underline'>inefficacious</hi>:<lb/>
and whether slight or heavy would be <hi rend='underline'>unprofitable</hi>. It would<lb/>
disturb the peace of Families [in more instances than <add>more often than</add> those in<lb/>
which] it would preserve it. It would exasperate the sufferings<lb/>
of the injured husband by forcing him to publish his Wife's<lb/>
dishonour and his own.</p>





Revision as of 18:34, 16 February 2012

Click Here To Edit


---page break---

6. C

Of Family Imposture.

opposite channels, is capable of producing such a variety of distress
as it would take a Volume to delineate.

2. Because it would not be worth while to make distinctions. 2. Because if there are some cases in which a less punishment
might suffice, the offence will always be so rare, that the
provisions necessary for the purpose of excepting them would
not pay the price of the room they would occupy in the Code.

Quest. II. Why the bringing up of Adulterous Issue as
Lawful is not punished as Family Imposture?

Reasons.

1. Because punishment in the former case would produce more mischief than it would prevent. 1. Because punishment if slight would be inefficacious:
and whether slight or heavy would be unprofitable. It would
disturb the peace of Families [in more instances than more often than those in
which] it would preserve it. It would exasperate the sufferings
of the injured husband by forcing him to publish his Wife's
dishonour and his own.




Identifier: | JB/071/112/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 71.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

not numbered

Box

071

Main Headings

penal code

Folio number

112

Info in main headings field

Image

002

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f5 / f6 / f7 / f8

Penner

Watermarks

[[watermarks::myears [lion with crown motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

caroline fox

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

23515

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in