JB/072/043/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/072/043/001: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/072/043/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/072/043/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<head>C</head><lb/> <note><gap/> <gap/> Law</note> <note>Suggestions to the Legislator</note><lb/> Instructions to the legislator<lb/><del>In aid of such provisions</del> <add><del>the punishments levelled directly</del></add><del> as it may be pro</del><lb/><del>against the</del><lb/><del>What</del> <del>The circumstances</del><lb/><note>1 How far a written is more dangerous than an oral <gap/></note> <p>Defamation when committed to<lb/><del>print is commonly looked upon with more anxiety</del><lb/><del>than when it is confined</del> <del>conveyed only from</del><lb/><del>mouth to mouth or confined to</del> writing is<lb/>commonly looked upon with much more anxiety,<lb/>than when it is convey'd only from mouth to<lb/>mouth. In the nomenclature of most laws<lb/>it constitutes a <del>separate</del> distinct offence: <del>If</del> and<lb/><del>however</del> is commonly treated with more severity<lb/><del>If however</del> <del>this</del> The circumstance of being <del>committed</del> <add>conveyd</add><lb/>by writing rather than in a less permanent form<lb/>is <add>however</add> <del>in fact</del> but an <del>external</del> <add>extrinsic</add> adventitious<lb/>circumstance: and if it enhances the mischief<lb/>on some accounts it diminishes it,as we<lb/>have seen, in others.</p><note> 2 - a printed than a written one.</note> The  circumstance of it's being in print <del><gap/></del> is another circumstance which seems<lb/>commonly to be looked upon as making a very<lb/>material alteration in the nature of the offence.<lb/>A considerable alteration no doubt it makes<lb/>in general: <del><gap/></del> but not necessarily. Sometimes a <add>paper</add>    ''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''


<head>C</head>
<head>Instructions to the legislator</head>
<p><note><gap/> &amp;c Law Law Suggestions to the Legislator</note> <del>In aid of such provisions <add>the punishments levelled directly</add> as it may be pro<lb/>against the</del> </p>
<p><add><del>What</del></add> <del>The circumstances</del><lb/>
<note>1 How far a written is more dangerous than an oral discourse</note> Defamation when committed to<lb/><del>print is commonly looked upon with more anxiety<lb/>than when it is confined conveyed only from<lb/>mouth to mouth or confined to</del> writing is<lb/>commonly looked upon with much more anxiety,<lb/>than when it is <sic>convey'd</sic> only from mouth to<lb/>mouth. In the nomenclature of most laws<lb/>it constitutes a <del>separate</del> distinct offence: <del>If</del> and<lb/><del>however</del> is commonly treated with more severity<lb/><del>If however</del> <del>this</del> The circumstance of being <del>committed</del> <add>conveyd</add><lb/>by writing rather than in a less permanent form<lb/>is <add>however</add> <del>in fact</del> but an <del>external</del> <add>extrinsic</add> adventitious<lb/>circumstance: and if it enhances the mischief<lb/>on some accounts it diminishes it,as we<lb/>have seen, in others.</p>
<p><note> 2 - a printed than a written one.</note> The  circumstance of it's being in print <del><gap/></del> is another circumstance which seems<lb/>commonly to be looked upon as making a very<lb/>material alteration in the nature of the offence.<lb/>A considerable alteration no doubt it makes<lb/>in general: <del><gap/></del> but not necessarily. Sometimes a <add>paper</add>    </p>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 16:48, 8 March 2012

Click Here To Edit

C Instructions to the legislator

&c Law Law Suggestions to the Legislator In aid of such provisions the punishments levelled directly as it may be pro
against the


What The circumstances
1 How far a written is more dangerous than an oral discourse Defamation when committed to
print is commonly looked upon with more anxiety
than when it is confined conveyed only from
mouth to mouth or confined to
writing is
commonly looked upon with much more anxiety,
than when it is convey'd only from mouth to
mouth. In the nomenclature of most laws
it constitutes a separate distinct offence: If and
however is commonly treated with more severity
If however this The circumstance of being committed conveyd
by writing rather than in a less permanent form
is however in fact but an external extrinsic adventitious
circumstance: and if it enhances the mischief
on some accounts it diminishes it,as we
have seen, in others.

2 - a printed than a written one. The circumstance of it's being in print is another circumstance which seems
commonly to be looked upon as making a very
material alteration in the nature of the offence.
A considerable alteration no doubt it makes
in general: but not necessarily. Sometimes a paper



Identifier: | JB/072/043/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 72.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-3

Box

072

Main Headings

penal code

Folio number

043

Info in main headings field

press

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d1 / f1 / d2 / f2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

myears

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

caroline fox

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

23660

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in