JB/100/006/003: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 03:36, 11 March 2012

Place and Time

Are the wisest institutions and the most
capricious to be upon the same footing in
respect of permanency? or + +what is more is the very abused
absurdity obstinacy of these capricious institutions to be
an argument for their continuance? duration?

Considered in the light of as serving for information, the best
answer that could be given to them would be
but nugatory: the only purpose they could seve
is that of admonition. In this light, even
maxims of no greater precision than the following
may have their use.

Identifier: \| JB/100/006/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 100.
Date_1		Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	100	Main Headings	influence of time and place
Folio number	006	Info in main headings field	place and time
Image	003	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	4
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [britannia with shield motif]]]
Marginals		Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	32022
Box Contents

Revision as of 03:30, 11 March 2012 view source Lea Stern (talk \| contribs) 6,553 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 03:36, 11 March 2012 view source Lea Stern (talk \| contribs) 6,553 edits No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 6:		Line 6:
	<p>Are the wisest institutions and the most<lb/> capricious to be upon the same footing in<lb/> respect of permanency? or <hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> <note><hi rend='superscript'>+</hi>what is more </note>is the very <add>abused</add><lb/> absurdity <add>obstinacy</add> of these capricious institutions to be <lb/>an argument for their continuance? <add>duration?</add> </p>		<p>Are the wisest institutions and the most<lb/> capricious to be upon the same footing in<lb/> respect of permanency? or <hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> <note><hi rend='superscript'>+</hi>what is more </note>is the very <add>abused</add><lb/> absurdity <add>obstinacy</add> of these capricious institutions to be <lb/>an argument for their continuance? <add>duration?</add> </p>

			<p>Considered in the light of <add>as serving for</add> information, the best <lb/>answer that could be given to them would be<lb/> but nugatory: the only purpose they could <del>seve </del> <lb/> is that of admonition. In this light, even<lb/> maxims of no greater precision than the following <lb/>may have their use.</p>

Views

JB/100/006/003: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 03:36, 11 March 2012

Navigation

Search