★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
<p><!-- indented --><add><del>We now come to consi</del></add> Reputation is the only remaining quarter in which | <head><hi rend='superscript'>12)</hi> Pers:<hi rend='superscript'>l</hi> Inj:<hi rend='superscript'>s</hi> Disabl:<hi rend='superscript'>t</hi> temp:<hi rend='superscript'>y</hi></head> | ||
<p><!-- indented --><note>Defence of the Defender's [own] reputation.</note> <add><del>We now come to consi</del></add> Reputation is the only remaining quarter in which | |||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
a man can be | a man can be attacked - We now then come lastly | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
to consider whether Protection of a man's self against | to consider whether Protection of a man's self against | ||
| Line 18: | Line 20: | ||
the sort in question . [an act of temporary disablement] | the sort in question . [an act of temporary disablement] | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
This case is not near so simple as either of the | <note>This case still less simple than either of the former — <del><gap/></del> why -</note> This case is not near so simple as either of the | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
former. The reason will soon appear from what | former. The reason will soon appear from what | ||
| Line 28: | Line 30: | ||
of the improper kind ; the entity it <del>characterises</del> <add>is the name of</add> | of the improper kind ; the entity it <del>characterises</del> <add>is the name of</add> | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
is <add>not a real but</add> a | is <add>not a real but</add> a fictitious entity - A man's person , his | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
property , [I mean here any <hi rend='underline'>thin</hi>g | property , [I mean here any <hi rend='underline'>thin</hi>g , any <del><hi rend='underline'>portion</hi></del><!-- only the underlining has been deleted, not the word --> of | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
<del><gap/></del> <add>< | <del><gap/></del> <add><sic>meatter</sic><!-- mis-spelling of 'matter' ? --></add> in which he can be said to have a property , | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
]<del><gap/></del> are real entities . On this account we | |||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
are not to be surprized that the notion of an attack | are not to be surprized that the notion of an attack | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
upon reputation bears | upon reputation bears <add>wears</add> <del>a <unclear>e</unclear><!-- or, 'i' --></del> an as such altogether | ||
<lb/> | |||
different from that of an attack either | |||
<lb/> | |||
upon <add>person or upon</add> property . To attack a man's person or | |||
<lb/> | |||
his property , <del>is immed</del> [I speak not here of <gap/><!-- looks like 'incerpercul' (or something similar) --> | |||
<lb/> | |||
property] is either immediately or <del><gap/></del> intermmediately | |||
<lb/> | |||
to <hi rend='underline'>touch</hi> them - What reputation [speaking | |||
<lb/> | |||
literally] is not any thing that can be <hi rend='underline'>touched</hi> . | |||
<lb/> | |||
What is it then that is really done when <del>a man's</del> | |||
<lb/> | |||
reputation is said to be attached? | |||
<lb/></p> | |||
<p><note>Attack upon reputation - what</note> A man's <sic>reputtation</sic> is said to be attached ,[or a man | |||
<lb/> | |||
is said to be attached in his reputations, ] when by words | |||
<lb/> | |||
or other signs such ideas are raised in the minds of | |||
<lb/> | |||
<add><del><gap/></del></add> persons on whom his happiness may chance to depend , as <add>have</add> | |||
<lb/></p> | <lb/></p> | ||
21-Mar-2012: under construction by Diane Folan. Please do not amend.
12) Pers:l Inj:s Disabl:t temp:y
Defence of the Defender's [own] reputation. We now come to consi Reputation is the only remaining quarter in which
a man can be attacked - We now then come lastly
to consider whether Protection of a man's self against
an attack made upon his reputation ought also to
operate as an exemption in favour of an act of
the sort in question . [an act of temporary disablement]
This case still less simple than either of the former — why - This case is not near so simple as either of the
former. The reason will soon appear from what
has been already on a former occasion remarked concerning the
word Reputation . Reputation is a substantive
of the improper kind ; the entity it characterises is the name of
is not a real but a fictitious entity - A man's person , his
property , [I mean here any thing , any portion of
meatter in which he can be said to have a property ,
] are real entities . On this account we
are not to be surprized that the notion of an attack
upon reputation bears wears a e an as such altogether
different from that of an attack either
upon person or upon property . To attack a man's person or
his property , is immed [I speak not here of
property] is either immediately or intermmediately
to touch them - What reputation [speaking
literally] is not any thing that can be touched .
What is it then that is really done when a man's
reputation is said to be attached?
Attack upon reputation - what A man's reputtation is said to be attached ,[or a man
is said to be attached in his reputations, ] when by words
or other signs such ideas are raised in the minds of
persons on whom his happiness may chance to depend , as have
|
Identifier: | JB/072/162/004"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 72. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
not numbered |
|||
|
072 |
penal code |
||
|
162 |
pers:l injuries disablt tempory |
||
|
004 |
|||
|
text sheet |
4 |
||
|
recto |
e9 / e10 / e11 / e12 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::[gr with crown motif] pro patria [with motif]]] |
||
|
23779 |
|||
