★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
<p>2 Latterly the £13..10<hi rend='superscript'>s</hi> was raised to £10.10 <lb/>but the <hi rend='underline'>lapse of time</hi> <lb/>the work of M<hi rend='superscript'>r</hi> Pitt<lb/> for the accommodation<lb/> originally of D<hi rend='superscript'>r</hi> Spencer.<lb/> p.2. <hi rend='superscript'>+1</hi> <note><hi rend='superscript'>+1</hi> which <hi rend='underline'>lapse of time</hi>, stands first among the four grounds of relinquishment. Treasury Proceedings 11<hi rend='superscript'>th</hi> June <gap/> N S </note> </p> | <p>2 Latterly the £13..10<hi rend='superscript'>s</hi> was raised to £10.10 <lb/>but the <hi rend='underline'>lapse of time</hi> <lb/>the work of M<hi rend='superscript'>r</hi> Pitt<lb/> for the accommodation<lb/> originally of D<hi rend='superscript'>r</hi> Spencer.<lb/> p.2. <hi rend='superscript'>+1</hi> <note><hi rend='superscript'>+1</hi> which <hi rend='underline'>lapse of time</hi>, stands first among the four grounds of relinquishment. Treasury Proceedings 11<hi rend='superscript'>th</hi> June <gap/> N S </note> </p> | ||
<p>4 Prospect of Decrease<lb/> In New South Wales<lb/> decrease of the <sic>expence</sic> <lb/>now far probable <lb/> p. 3. </p> | <p>4 Prospect of Decrease<lb/> In New South Wales<lb/> decrease of the <sic>expence</sic> <lb/>now far probable <lb/> p. 3. </p> | ||
<head>7 </head> | <head>7 </head> | ||
<p>1. But there is no <lb/> | <p>1. But there is no <lb/> of its ever<lb/> being reduced so<lb/> low as the above<lb/> — £13..10<lb/> nor even as the £18..10 <lb/> p. 3. </p> | ||
<head>8</head> | |||
<p>Long before it <del>was</del> <add> were</add> <lb/> reduced below the<lb/> <sic>Panopticon</sic> <sic>expence</sic>,<lb/> the <sic> Panopticon</sic> <sic>expence</sic> <lb/>would be <lb/> reduced to 0— p.4 </p> | |||
<head>9</head> | |||
<p>1. Probable decrease — <lb/>amount if is according<lb/> to the supporters <lb/>of New South Wales — <lb/>viz: not so much<lb/> as <del>a</del> 1/5 reducing it<lb/> from £46..5 a year<lb/> per Convict say<lb/> to £37 — p.5. <pb/> | |||
<head>V<add>5</add> <!-- below the line --> | |||
Economy<lb/> II. Prospect of Decrease. <lb/>10 </head> | |||
<p>— which is the exact<lb/> double of <sic>Panopticon</sic> <lb/> <sic>expence</sic> as enhanced<lb/> by Pitt & perfidy<lb/> & nearly treble, if <lb/><sic>unenhanced</sic>. — p. 7.</p> | |||
Line 107: | Line 114: | ||
Click Here To Edit
Compensation}
V Economy}
IV4 Compensation
1
4. Fourths object, compensation
or satisfaction: viz: for the damage
by the offence, for which the punishment
of the transportation
was inflicted.
This, though it ought
to be among the ends of penal justice, is
not under the English
law in the case of
transportable offences. p.1
2
Cause of this omission.
The profit to the King
by forfeiture was the
only direct object of
penal justice under
the feudal barbarism.
3
Felling's opinions and
labours of the Author
on this subject.—
4
His plan for introducing
the principle
into penal legislation
at his own expence.
His struggle with the
Treasury to keep in
the the article
for that purpose in
the Contract. p.
5
In N. S. Wales compensation
out of that fund is altogether
impossible; the value
of a man's labour
then being £46 a
year less than nothing.
6
But the object will
hardly be denied to
be a desirable one.
7
— if so, in so far as
the Panopticon system
contributes to it it
has the advantage of
the N. S. Wales registers.
p.5.
8.
The compensation
with which the
auther was amused
for his injuries,
belongs to another
head & will be
spoken of in another
place. — p. 5
---page break---
Marg Contents
V5 Economy </lb> Past comparative Expence —
1
Convict expence —
reference for grounds
and calculations to
the 28th Finance Rep.
1. Past actual expence
p.1.
2
In New South Wales
annual expence per
Convict, as per D__
£33..s 9 d 5 p
Maximum
(The most
probable) }£46..7.0 1/4
p.1.
3
D of Panopticon —
system — if established
when promised £13..10..0
p. 1.
4
Ratio, from more
than 1/2 to less than
1/4 of N. S. Wales p. 2.
5
2 Latterly the £13..10s was raised to £10.10
but the lapse of time
the work of Mr Pitt
for the accommodation
originally of Dr Spencer.
p.2. +1 +1 which lapse of time, stands first among the four grounds of relinquishment. Treasury Proceedings 11th June N S
4 Prospect of Decrease
In New South Wales
decrease of the expence
now far probable
p. 3.
7
1. But there is no
of its ever
being reduced so
low as the above
— £13..10
nor even as the £18..10
p. 3.
8
Long before it was were
reduced below the
Panopticon expence,
the Panopticon expence
would be
reduced to 0— p.4
9
1. Probable decrease —
amount if is according
to the supporters
of New South Wales —
viz: not so much
as a 1/5 reducing it
from £46..5 a year
per Convict say
to £37 — p.5.
---page break---
V5
Economy
II. Prospect of Decrease.
10
— which is the exact
double of Panopticon
expence as enhanced
by Pitt & perfidy
& nearly treble, if
unenhanced. — p. 7.
Identifier: | JB/116/273/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 116. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1802-08-07 |
1-8, 1-17, 17a, 18-40 |
||
116 |
panopticon versus new south wales |
||
273 |
iv compensation v economy marg. contents |
||
001 |
|||
marginal summary sheet |
2 |
||
recto |
|||
john herbert koe |
cw 1799 |
||
c. abbit lees |
|||
1799 |
|||
37806 |
|||