★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
He observes - and with great truth - <add>(3. IV. Ch.1)</add> that if the crown<lb/> | <p>He observes - and with great truth - <add>(3. IV. Ch.1)</add> that if the crown<lb/> | ||
takes <del>all</del> <add>every thing</add>, there remains nothing for any body else. <del>But</del><lb/> | |||
<del>is it necessary or right, that where <add>while</add> private damage <unclear>remains</unclear></del> <lb/> | <del>is it necessary or right, that where <add>while</add> private damage <unclear>remains</unclear></del> <lb/> | ||
<del><unclear>uncompensatable</unclear>, the Crown | <del><unclear>uncompensatable</unclear>, the Crown, or any bodyin the name of the</del> <lb/> | ||
<del>Crown should take every thing? The <gap/> of this question</del><lb/> | <del>Crown should take every thing? The <gap/> of this question</del><lb/> | ||
<del>is what he found < | <del>is what he found <unclear>it</unclear> <unclear>much</unclear> <add>as-</add> more convenient — to assume,</del> <lb/> | ||
<del> | <del> than to <gap/> as it would have <gap/> <add>found it</add> difficult <unclear>to</unclear> <unclear>prove</unclear> </del> | ||
"As the public <unclear>order</unclear> (says he) is not otherwise avenged <note><del>Comment. B.IV. Ch.1.</del></note><lb/> | |||
"than by forfeiture of life and property, it is impossible<lb/> | |||
"<hi rend='underline'>afterwards</hi> to make any reparation for the private<lb/> | |||
"wrong." — But is it necessary or right, that while damage<lb/> | |||
remains without reparation — injury, without redress — the<lb/> | |||
<del>Crown, or any body in the name of the Crown, should</del> <add>King - <del>that is <gap/><gap/> 73</del> who has <gap/> no damage — that is</add><lb/> | |||
<unclear>it</unclear> <unclear>as</unclear> 73 in the name of the King — should<lb/> | |||
take every thing — should swipe away the whole of that<lb/> | |||
fund from which reparation might have been afforded. <lb/> | |||
The affirmation was found as easy to assume, as it would<lb/> | |||
have been difficult to prove.</p> | |||
He observes - and with great truth - (3. IV. Ch.1) that if the crown
takes all every thing, there remains nothing for any body else. But
is it necessary or right, that where while private damage remains
uncompensatable, the Crown, or any bodyin the name of the
Crown should take every thing? The of this question
is what he found it much as- more convenient — to assume,
than to as it would have found it difficult to prove
"As the public order (says he) is not otherwise avenged Comment. B.IV. Ch.1.
"than by forfeiture of life and property, it is impossible
"afterwards to make any reparation for the private
"wrong." — But is it necessary or right, that while damage
remains without reparation — injury, without redress — the
Crown, or any body in the name of the Crown, should King - that is 73 who has no damage — that is
it as 73 in the name of the King — should
take every thing — should swipe away the whole of that
fund from which reparation might have been afforded.
The affirmation was found as easy to assume, as it would
have been difficult to prove.
|
Identifier: | JB/116/001/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 116. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1802-10-17 |
|||
|
116 |
panopticon versus new south wales |
||
|
001 |
panopticon versus |
||
|
001 |
note to p. 54 |
||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
|||
|
jeremy bentham |
1800 |
||
|
1800 |
|||
|
37534 |
|||
