JB/073/027/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/073/027/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head>COINING   <sic>AESTIMATION</sic> of Quant. of 'Punishment.</head><lb/><note>elevated</note><lb/> <p>The <add>high</add> Station which the offences <del>of Coining</del> <add>upon the law</add> occupy<lb/> in the Scale of Crimes, is owing not to the<lb/>Nature of a single Act, but to the presumption<lb/>which every single act affords of a <gap/> that is <lb/>of <add>the existence present &amp; future of </add> an indefinite number of <add>other</add> acts of the like<lb/> kin, past &amp; future<lb/></p> <p>And if the keeping up of the Punishment as <add>considered as attributed to a single act</add> to<lb/> a <unclear><add>particular</add></unclear> degree any way, <unclear><sic>apporachily</sic></unclear> to [that of] this<lb/> present be, (as it should seem to be) any ways<lb/> justifiable, it is on the principle of compensating<lb/> <hi rend='underline'>certainty</hi> by <hi rend='underline'>intensity</hi>.<lb/></p> <note>Idem therefore precipitate</note> <lb/><pb/> <head>2</head><lb/> <p><add>morrow</add> And the propensity of the people  <add>from the Act</add> to infer the Habit<lb/>&amp; from thence to take a magnified Idea of the<lb/>Crime <add>magnified</add> beyond what that of a single committal<lb/> of it would import, diminishes <del><gap/></del> in the present <lb/> instance the tendancy which an <gap/><lb/> of intensity has to detract from Certainty:<lb/> the degree of Punishment actually <del>expedient</del> competent is by<lb/> this means not so much raised above <add>stretched beyond</add> that which<lb/> they think competent as to <sic>indisposess</sic> them<lb/> against co-operating towards it's execution, at<lb/> <note>Where they are not in alliance with the Executive power, they are commonly at least <unclear>neuter</unclear></note> <lb/>least as to dispose them to counteract it<lb/></p> <p>The small ratio [of the number] of offences discoverable<lb/> of punishable to [that of] those [which are]<lb/> committed is <add>also</add> a <del>farther</del> reason why an aggravated<lb/> <note>Sum of Suffering small</note> <lb/>Punishment on the same <del>not only</del> of the quantity of suffering<lb/> of those on whom it is inflicted, as well as<lb/> on the <unclear>score</unclear> of those for whose sake it is inflicted.</p> <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<head>COINING AESTIMATION <!-- ligature --> of Quant. of 'Punishment.</head><lb/>
<p><note>elevated</note><lb/> <p>The <add>high</add> Station which the offences <del>of Coining</del> <add>upon the law</add> occupy<lb/> in the Scale of Crimes, is owing not to the<lb/>Nature of a single Act, but to the presumption<lb/>which every single act affords of a <gap/> that is <lb/>of <add>the existence present &amp; future of </add> an indefinite number of <add>other</add> acts of the like<lb/> kin, past &amp; future<lb/></p>  
 
<p>And if the keeping up of the Punishment as <note>considered as attributed to a single act</note> to<lb/> a degree <add>pitch</add> any way, approaching to [that of] this<lb/> present be, (as it should seem to be) any ways<lb/> justifiable, it is on the principle of compensating<lb/> <hi rend='underline'>certainty</hi> by <hi rend='underline'>intensity</hi>. <note>Idem therefore precipitate</note></p>
 
<pb/>  
 
<head>2</head><lb/>  
 
<p><add>morrow</add> And the propensity of the people  <add>from the Act</add> to infer the Habit<lb/>&amp; from thence to take a magnified Idea of the<lb/>Crime <add>magnified</add> beyond what that of a single committal<lb/> of it would import, diminishes <del><gap/></del> in the present <lb/> instance the tendency which an <sic>encrease</sic><lb/> of intensity has to detract from Certainty:<lb/> the degree of Punishment actually <del>expedient</del> competent is by<lb/> this means not so much raised above <add>stretched beyond</add> that which<lb/> they think competent as to <sic>indisposess</sic> them<lb/> against co-operating towards it's execution, at<lb/> <note>Where they are not in alliance with the Executive power, they are commonly at least neuter</note> <lb/>least as to dispose them to counteract it<lb/></p>  
 
<p>The small ratio [of the number] of offences discoverable<lb/> of punishable to [that of] those [which are]<lb/> committed is <add>also</add> a <del>farther</del> reason why an aggravated<lb/> <note>Sum of Suffering small</note> <lb/>Punishment on the same <del>not only</del> of the quantity of suffering<lb/> of those on whom it is inflicted, as well as<lb/> on the <unclear>score</unclear> of those for whose sake it is inflicted.</p>  
 
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 14:49, 3 May 2012


Click Here To Edit

COINING AESTIMATION of Quant. of 'Punishment.

elevated

The high Station which the offences of Coining upon the law occupy
in the Scale of Crimes, is owing not to the
Nature of a single Act, but to the presumption
which every single act affords of a that is
of the existence present & future of an indefinite number of other acts of the like
kin, past & future

And if the keeping up of the Punishment as considered as attributed to a single act to
a degree pitch any way, approaching to [that of] this
present be, (as it should seem to be) any ways
justifiable, it is on the principle of compensating
certainty by intensity. Idem therefore precipitate


---page break---

2

morrow And the propensity of the people from the Act to infer the Habit
& from thence to take a magnified Idea of the
Crime magnified beyond what that of a single committal
of it would import, diminishes in the present
instance the tendency which an encrease
of intensity has to detract from Certainty:
the degree of Punishment actually expedient competent is by
this means not so much raised above stretched beyond that which
they think competent as to indisposess them
against co-operating towards it's execution, at
Where they are not in alliance with the Executive power, they are commonly at least neuter
least as to dispose them to counteract it

The small ratio [of the number] of offences discoverable
of punishable to [that of] those [which are]
committed is also a farther reason why an aggravated
Sum of Suffering small
Punishment on the same not only of the quantity of suffering
of those on whom it is inflicted, as well as
on the score of those for whose sake it is inflicted.



Identifier: | JB/073/027/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 73.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

073

Main Headings

law in general

Folio number

027

Info in main headings field

coining aestimation & quant. of punishment

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f1 / f2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

23867

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in