JB/073/036/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/073/036/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:


<head>2.</head><lb/> <head>THEFT.  <sic>ANOMALITIES</sic> RESTRICTIVE</head><lb/>
<head>2.</head><lb/> <head>THEFT.  <sic>ANOMALITIES</sic> RESTRICTIVE</head><lb/>
<p>Talking of that which had as intimates in union with the Soil of which the field<lb/> consorted, as any part of that Soil had with another.  Unity was conceived to<lb/> extend <add>exist so long</add> so far as they saw contiguity uninterrupted.  <lb/></p> <p>This, Had it <gap/><gap/> is far from being thye east pleasurable of the errors <add>into</add> which men<lb/> must necessarily fall, when without thinking to lift up their eyes to the Index of<lb/> Utility, <unclear>Dialectic</unclear> analogues of allusions are the guides they follow.<lb/></p> But when they came to the giving of the <unclear>Saviour</unclear> of the <unclear>Realty</unclear> <del><gap/></del> <add>as</add> a reason, why <lb/> <del>the taking of a Ward is not Felony</del> why the taking of a ward cannot be Larceny, <hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> <lb/> nor of a Boxfull of Title Deeds, their doctricus it must be owned, savour a little of <lb/> extravagence:  whihc however is nothing <add>eclipsed</add>  in comparison with this pleasant conceit of <gap/><lb/> like <add>according to which</add> that the <sic>savour</sic>of the Deeds by <del><gap/></del> <add><gap/></add> the  <gap/> that encloses them, renders <lb/> it as worthless as themselves.  It may be of service <del>to fight</del> to know that if <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<p>Talking of that which had as intimates in union with the Soil of which the field<lb/> consorted, as any part of that Soil had with another.  Unity was conceived to<lb/> extend <add>exist so long</add> so far as they saw contiguity uninterrupted.  <lb/></p> <p>This, Had it <gap/><gap/> is far from being thye east pleasurable of the errors <add>into</add> which men<lb/> must necessarily fall, when without thinking to lift up their eyes to the Index of<lb/> Utility, <unclear>Dialectic</unclear> analogues of allusions are the guides they follow.<lb/></p> <p>But when they came to the giving of the <unclear>Saviour</unclear> of the <unclear>Realty</unclear> <del><gap/></del> <add>as</add> a reason, why <lb/> <del>the taking of a Ward is not Felony</del> why the taking of a ward cannot be Larceny, <hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> <lb/> nor of a Boxfull of Title Deeds, their doctricus it must be owned, savour a little of <lb/> extravagence:  whihc however is nothing <add>eclipsed</add>  in comparison with this pleasant conceit of <gap/><lb/> like <add>according to which</add> that the <sic>savour</sic>of the Deeds by <del><gap/></del> <add><gap/></add> the  <gap/> that encloses them, renders <lb/> it as worthless as themselves.  It may be of service <del>to fight</del> to know <add>any one who may chance to have an handsome or <unclear>cupious</unclear> box to put their property in</add>, that if<lb/> for <unclear>Edes Coker's</unclear> word is to be taken for it, then Law has been made <del>&amp;</del> a present of <del><gap/></del> <add>Box &amp; all </add> to <lb/> who shall take a fancy to it. <add>Note.  This about <gap/> Box is left out by the <gap/> <gap/> in his larger <add><unclear>Halas</unclear> smaller work inserted on the Pleas of the Crown for E>G> but it is left out.</add></add> I have seen Boxes <add>for that purpose</add> that have<lb/> cost <del>several guineas</del> <add>some pounds.</add><lb/></p> <p>Even the more sober deductions from the principle [ of a supposed necessary unifromity<lb/> of the Law concerning the whole of <gap/> the points] when they come to be exemplified<lb/> <del>like to dispute this</del> <add>suggest considerations</add> which one should have thought would have given a shock to the solidity<lb/> of the  Doctrine.  If a man cuts down a tree and marches off with it immediately, it is all<lb/> very well, &amp; no harm is to happen to him: But the Judges <del>were forced  </del> <add>could not avoid</add> determining  <add>Hale <gap/> J. C. <unclear>510</unclear></add> that if <lb/> he cuts it down " and after, about an hour's time, or so comes and <unclear>pitches</unclear> it away" this is <lb/> "in that interval the property lodgeth in the right owner as a chattel."<lb/></p> <p>But this account is not entirely <add>altogether</add> satisfactory, &amp; that it would have been well<lb/> told us with a little more precision, the time which <del>chief</del> such a metamorphosis <add>since it does not take place at once, will </add> <del>will</del> <lb/> take to operate: <del>and it <gap/> matter difficult</del> <add>nor does it seem easy</add> to find the reason why this saver which will <del>depart</del><lb/> <add>go off</add> in an hour or so at least <del>who provided the Thief be about</del> <add>when the Thief is gone</add> should not be able<lb/> to escape in God knows how long, <del>during his <gap/></del> while he is by.<lb/></p> <p>Mean-while if this tree <del>is</del> were stuck into the ground again, or if a <unclear>scantling</unclear> if it<lb/> <del><gap/></del> <add>were</add> cut off &amp; <unclear>truckled</unclear> on to another, <add>it formed a part of this <unclear>realty</unclear> again  &amp;</add> and <sic>reqacquired</sic> this <sic>savor</sic>.  &amp;so takes <unclear>quities</unclear> as often<lb/> as it was disformed and reanimated: &amp; thus the driving in of a nail and <add>or</add> drawing it  out again<lb/> would as often determine, on the one hand  whether one man was to have the Law's protection<lb/> for his won, on the other <del><add>hand</add></del> whether another man was to have or die.<lb/></p> <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 14:43, 16 May 2012

Click Here To Edit

2.
THEFT. ANOMALITIES RESTRICTIVE

Talking of that which had as intimates in union with the Soil of which the field
consorted, as any part of that Soil had with another. Unity was conceived to
extend exist so long so far as they saw contiguity uninterrupted.

This, Had it is far from being thye east pleasurable of the errors into which men
must necessarily fall, when without thinking to lift up their eyes to the Index of
Utility, Dialectic analogues of allusions are the guides they follow.

But when they came to the giving of the Saviour of the Realty as a reason, why
the taking of a Ward is not Felony why the taking of a ward cannot be Larceny, +
nor of a Boxfull of Title Deeds, their doctricus it must be owned, savour a little of
extravagence: whihc however is nothing eclipsed in comparison with this pleasant conceit of
like according to which that the savourof the Deeds by the that encloses them, renders
it as worthless as themselves. It may be of service to fight to know any one who may chance to have an handsome or cupious box to put their property in, that if
for Edes Coker's word is to be taken for it, then Law has been made & a present of Box & all to
who shall take a fancy to it. Note. This about Box is left out by the in his larger <add>Halas smaller work inserted on the Pleas of the Crown for E>G> but it is left out.</add> I have seen Boxes for that purpose that have
cost several guineas some pounds.

Even the more sober deductions from the principle [ of a supposed necessary unifromity
of the Law concerning the whole of the points] when they come to be exemplified
like to dispute this suggest considerations which one should have thought would have given a shock to the solidity
of the Doctrine. If a man cuts down a tree and marches off with it immediately, it is all
very well, & no harm is to happen to him: But the Judges were forced could not avoid determining Hale J. C. 510 that if
he cuts it down " and after, about an hour's time, or so comes and pitches it away" this is
"in that interval the property lodgeth in the right owner as a chattel."

But this account is not entirely altogether satisfactory, & that it would have been well
told us with a little more precision, the time which chief such a metamorphosis since it does not take place at once, will will
take to operate: and it matter difficult nor does it seem easy to find the reason why this saver which will depart
go off in an hour or so at least who provided the Thief be about when the Thief is gone should not be able
to escape in God knows how long, during his while he is by.

Mean-while if this tree is were stuck into the ground again, or if a scantling if it
were cut off & truckled on to another, it formed a part of this realty again & and reqacquired this savor. &so takes quities as often
as it was disformed and reanimated: & thus the driving in of a nail and or drawing it out again
would as often determine, on the one hand whether one man was to have the Law's protection
for his won, on the other hand whether another man was to have or die.


Identifier: | JB/073/036/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 73.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

073

Main Headings

law in general

Folio number

036

Info in main headings field

theft anomalities restrictive

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [lion with vryheyt motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

23876

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in