JB/072/164/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/072/164/002: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
JFoxe (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/072/164/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/072/164/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<pb/>
 
<head>18) Pers:<hi rend='superscript'>l</hi> Inj:<hi rend='superscript'>s</hi> Disabl:<hi rend='superscript'>t</hi> temp.<hi rend='superscript'>y</hi>.</head>
 
<p><note>Reputation Inconveniences of such an allowance as abovementioned.</note> If strict proof <hi rend='underline'>were</hi> to be required of the matter of justification,<lb/>
the rule would be of <hi rend='underline'>little use</hi>. The report<lb/>
as far as it went must be supposed not to have<lb/>
been intelligible to strangers: for if it were, the mischief<lb/>
would have been done already and <del>the</del> <add>no</add> force<lb/>
<add>that could be</add> put upon the defamer would answer <del>no</del> <add>any</add> end. The<lb/>
party then in order to bring himself within the justification<lb/>
must make that appear to <add>a</add> stranger<del>s</del> (viz<lb/>
the Judge<del>s</del>) what by the supposition did not appear<lb/>
to strangers upon the face of the transaction. He<lb/>
must <sic>shew</sic>, from circumstances <del><add>what</add></del> within his <sic>knowlege</sic><lb/>
and which <del>must be</del> <add>he</add> must be in a condition to <del>prove</del> <add>make proof of,</add><lb/>
that the words <add>such and</add> so many as were spoken, could<lb/>
not be designed <add>for any other purpose than</add> <del>but</del> to convey such a report.</p>





Revision as of 21:26, 17 May 2012

Click Here To Edit


---page break---

18) Pers:l Inj:s Disabl:t temp.y.

Reputation Inconveniences of such an allowance as abovementioned. If strict proof were to be required of the matter of justification,
the rule would be of little use. The report
as far as it went must be supposed not to have
been intelligible to strangers: for if it were, the mischief
would have been done already and the no force
that could be put upon the defamer would answer no any end. The
party then in order to bring himself within the justification
must make that appear to a strangers (viz
the Judges) what by the supposition did not appear
to strangers upon the face of the transaction. He
must shew, from circumstances what within his knowlege
and which must be he must be in a condition to prove make proof of,
that the words such and so many as were spoken, could
not be designed for any other purpose than but to convey such a report.




Identifier: | JB/072/164/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 72.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

not numbered

Box

072

Main Headings

penal code

Folio number

164

Info in main headings field

pers:l inj:s disabl:t tempory

Image

002

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e17 / e18 / e19 / e20

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[gr with crown motif] pro patria [with motif]]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

23781

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in