★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
14-Jun-2012: under construction by Diane Folan. Please do not amend. | |||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
Clark's case to be law — or <add>[+]</add> they must have agreed in | Clark's case to be law — or <add>[+]</add> they must have agreed in | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
<del><gap/></del> looking upon it as untenable . | <del><gap/></del> looking upon it as untenable . If it <gap/> it | ||
<lb/> | |||
could never have <gap/> into their conception that <gap/> | |||
<lb/> | |||
it was in the power of the King by <gap/> <add>a confederacy</add> with | |||
<lb/> | |||
a part of his subjects <del>going</del> withdrawing themselves | |||
<lb/> | |||
for this purpose to a distant country , | |||
14-Jun-2012: under construction by Diane Folan. Please do not amend.
This distraction between human beings on the one
hand , and stocks and stones in the other , I can not
help looking upon , my Lord, as a distraction that
has its ground in nature , [and common sense .] Unfortunately
to this it never seems to have made obtained
its way to entrance into the minds of lawyers . If it had , either
they must have agreed from first to last on denying
Clark's case to be law — or [+] they must have agreed in
looking upon it as untenable . If it it
could never have into their conception that
it was in the power of the King by a confederacy with
a part of his subjects going withdrawing themselves
for this purpose to a distant country ,
|
Identifier: | JB/116/146/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 116. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1802-07-24 |
|||
|
116 |
panopticon versus new south wales |
||
|
146 |
n. s. wales |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
e3 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::[monogram] 1800]] |
||
|
1800 |
|||
|
37679 |
|||
