★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
8 Aug<lb/><note>2. <gap/></note><lb/>Omit<lb/>which some would <add>be eager to</add> <gap/> is - that there ought to be no<lb/>Minister in England: my <gap/> is that there ought<lb/>to be a Minister in Norfolk Island. In Norfolk Island<lb/>- yes and in New South Wales as many Ministers<lb/>as congregations. No Minister, no congregation:<lb/>the <gap/>, if good in any one place, will <del>be</del> act<lb/>less good in many others. <del>And if Ministers why<lb/>not Bishops? I mean in process of time: though<lb/>for New South Wales as for Man and <gap/><lb/>America, for some time one <add>I suppose might</add> envy same. Suppose<lb/>for example our Lord the late Bishop of <gap/><lb/>lately translated to <gap/> <gap/> was to be translated<lb/>still higher to Paramatta? The more arduous the<lb/>task the greater the glory: he might then promote<lb/>in peace and quietness that reformation which with a<lb/>zeal or <gap/> be opposed here after a preliminary <add>consent</add> to<lb/>be opposed here in England.</del> | 8 Aug<lb/><note>2. <gap/></note><lb/>Omit<lb/>which some would <add>be eager to</add> <gap/> is - that there ought to be no <add>(a</add><lb/>Minister in England: my <gap/> is that there ought<lb/>to be a Minister in Norfolk Island. In Norfolk Island<lb/>- yes and in New South Wales as many Ministers<lb/>as congregations. No Minister, no congregation:<lb/>the <gap/>, if good in any one place, will <del>be</del> act<lb/>less good in many others. <del>And if Ministers why<lb/>not Bishops? I mean in process of time: though<lb/>for New South Wales as for Man and <gap/><lb/>America, for some time one <add>I suppose might</add> envy same. Suppose<lb/>for example our Lord the late Bishop of <gap/><lb/>lately translated to <gap/> <gap/> was to be translated<lb/>still higher to Paramatta? The more arduous the<lb/>task the greater the glory: he might then promote<lb/>in peace and quietness that reformation which with a<lb/>zeal or <gap/> be opposed here after a preliminary <add>consent</add> to<lb/>be opposed here in England.</del> | ||
8 Aug
2.
Omit
which some would be eager to is - that there ought to be no (a
Minister in England: my is that there ought
to be a Minister in Norfolk Island. In Norfolk Island
- yes and in New South Wales as many Ministers
as congregations. No Minister, no congregation:
the , if good in any one place, will be act
less good in many others. And if Ministers why
not Bishops? I mean in process of time: though
for New South Wales as for Man and
America, for some time one I suppose might envy same. Suppose
for example our Lord the late Bishop of
lately translated to was to be translated
still higher to Paramatta? The more arduous the
task the greater the glory: he might then promote
in peace and quietness that reformation which with a
zeal or be opposed here after a preliminary consent to
be opposed here in England.
|
Identifier: | JB/116/244/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 116. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
0000-08-08Unable to interpret the "0000-08-08" input value as valid date or time component with "There is no year 0 in Gregorian and Julian calendars." being reported. |
|||
|
116 |
panopticon versus new south wales |
||
|
244 |
|||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
e4 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
|||
|
[[notes_public::"omitt" [note in bentham's hand]]] |
37777 |
||
