JB/116/142/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/116/142/001: Difference between revisions

Lea Stern (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Lea Stern (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
<p>that so much can <del>have been taken from &#x2014; not for their<lb/> future years so <add>such</add> <gap/> effectual care</del> has been taken, from the time of John to the time of George the<lb/> third <del>and</del> (care which for these fourteen years has been <lb/>so ineffectual) that Englishmen should not be exposed<lb/> to be legislated upon in the <sic>Kings</sic>  name by such men<lb/> as M<hi rend='superscript'>r</hi> Pitt, and <add>by such laws by </add> the manner in which M<hi rend='superscript'>r</hi> Pitt <add>had legislated</add> legislates,<lb/> "without consent of Parliament"? </p>
<p>that so much can <del>have been taken from &#x2014; not for their<lb/> future years so <add>such</add> <gap/> effectual care</del> has been taken, from the time of John to the time of George the<lb/> third <del>and</del> (care which for these fourteen years has been <lb/>so ineffectual) that Englishmen should not be exposed<lb/> to be legislated upon in the <sic>Kings</sic>  name by such men<lb/> as M<hi rend='superscript'>r</hi> Pitt, and <add>by such laws by </add> the manner in which M<hi rend='superscript'>r</hi> Pitt <add>had legislated</add> legislates,<lb/> "without consent of Parliament"? </p>


 
<p>Under two modes <hi rend='underline'>purchase</hi> and <hi rend='underline'>descent</hi> Lord Coke<lb/> together with all other lawyers comprise all imaginable<lb/> modes of <gap/> in land whether in the case <lb/>of an individual or in the case of the King. Under<lb/> purchase they place <hi rend='underline'>conquest</hi> a mode of purchase<lb/> peculiar <del>to the <gap/> under s general</del> <add>in every country to him</add> <del>who has under<lb/> his command</del> <add>at his</add><lb/> <add></add> <add>under whose direction</add> the armed force, if it has been employed,<lb/> of any mode of acquiring dominion this was not either<lb/> purchase or descent down to Lord Coke <gap/> no<lb/> idea had been entertained by <add>English</add> lawyers. <unclear>Say</unclear> which of<lb/> these two modes was it <hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> <note><hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> that presiding Kings made the acquisition of whatever rights they may have <del>inex</del> possessed as well as exercised over Colonies not obtained by them by conquest? &#x2014;</note> that the George the third made<lb/> the acquisition of <gap/> rights in relation to New<lb/> South Wales. <add>By <gap/></add> Neither the one nor the other may <add>might</add> <gap/> <lb/>hopes be answered in <add>by</add> behalf M<hi rend='superscript'>r</hi> Pitt but by occupancy: <lb/>for occupancy <add>under the English law</add> is among the Modes of purchase.<lb/> Good I answer again
 





Revision as of 00:15, 1 July 2012

Click Here To Edit

24 July 1802
N. S. Wales
8

that so much can have been taken from — not for their
future years so such effectual care
has been taken, from the time of John to the time of George the
third and (care which for these fourteen years has been
so ineffectual) that Englishmen should not be exposed
to be legislated upon in the Kings name by such men
as Mr Pitt, and by such laws by the manner in which Mr Pitt had legislated legislates,
"without consent of Parliament"?

Under two modes purchase and descent Lord Coke
together with all other lawyers comprise all imaginable
modes of in land whether in the case
of an individual or in the case of the King. Under
purchase they place conquest a mode of purchase
peculiar to the under s general in every country to him who has under
his command
at his
under whose direction the armed force, if it has been employed,
of any mode of acquiring dominion this was not either
purchase or descent down to Lord Coke no
idea had been entertained by English lawyers. Say which of
these two modes was it + + that presiding Kings made the acquisition of whatever rights they may have inex possessed as well as exercised over Colonies not obtained by them by conquest? — that the George the third made
the acquisition of rights in relation to New
South Wales. By Neither the one nor the other may might
hopes be answered in by behalf Mr Pitt but by occupancy:
for occupancy under the English law is among the Modes of purchase.
Good I answer again

Identifier: | JB/116/142/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 116.

Date_1

1802-07-24

Marginal Summary Numbering

7 continued

Box

116

Main Headings

panopticon versus new south wales

Folio number

142

Info in main headings field

n. s. wales

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e8

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[monogram] 1800]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1800

Notes public

ID Number

37675

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in