★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<!-- NB: delete tags have been added to the first paragraph, which has been deleted vertically. Please remove them if they are not required in the final production of the folio. --> | |||
<head>24 July 1802</head><!-- aligned to the left-hand margin, and in pencil --> | <head>24 July 1802</head><!-- aligned to the left-hand margin, and in pencil --> | ||
Line 8: | Line 10: | ||
<head><del>3</del>4 <note>III Non-<unclear>exist.</unclear><!-- abbreviation for 'existence' ? --> proved</note></head><!-- all in pencil --> | <head><del>3</del>4 <note>III Non-<unclear>exist.</unclear><!-- abbreviation for 'existence' ? --> proved</note></head><!-- all in pencil --> | ||
<p><!-- indented -->If it had , nothing in the way of legislation would | <p><del><!-- indented -->If it had , nothing in the way of legislation would | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
from first to last have been done in English America | from first to last have been done in English America | ||
Line 19: | Line 21: | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
sides would have been saved . | sides would have been saved . | ||
<lb/></p> | <lb/></del></p> | ||
<p><!-- indented -->In <add>In 1722</add> the time of the opinion given by Sir Clement | <p><!-- indented -->In <add>In 1722</add> the time of the opinion given by Sir Clement |
24 July 1802 N . S . Wales Conduct
34 III Non-exist. proved
If it had , nothing in the way of legislation would
from first to last have been done in English America
but by Parliament , or under the immediate eye of
Parliament : and the American war , with all its miseries ,
and all its waste of blood and treasure on both
sides would have been saved .
In In 1722 the time of the opinion given by Sir Clement
Wearg and Sir Philip Yorke , the view mens views of the matter
though not clear as above , was were yet considerably
improved . The distinction made in that
case is this . A Colony is obtained either by conquest
or without conquest : if obtained by conquest
the King may legislate over it without any consent,
expressly given by any of the inhabitants : if without
conquest , he can not without a consent expressly
given by a part of the inhabitants viz: whatever the majority of
part comes under the denomination of an assembly .
In the case submitted to laid before them for their opinion , the
right of the King to legislate over any Colony with
the consent of an Assembly of that Colony was not stated
as having been the subject of any dispute : it was therefore
a question that never called on their part for
consideration : if they decided on it , it was collaterally
and in fact without thinking it . With an assembly
they found the power legislation exercised by the King
in these colonies without Parliament in point of fact ,
and nobody suggesting a doubt about it , it was no business of
Identifier: | JB/116/147/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 116. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1802-07-24 |
|||
116 |
panopticon versus new south wales |
||
147 |
n. s. wales |
||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
e4 |
||
jeremy bentham |
|||
37680 |
|||