JB/116/145/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/116/145/001: Difference between revisions

Diane Folan (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Diane Folan (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/116/145/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/116/145/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
06-Jul-2012: under construction by Diane Folan.  Please do not amend.




Line 17: Line 14:
not from <del>the</del> Westminster Hall as Judges - had got so
not from <del>the</del> Westminster Hall as Judges - had got so
<lb/>
<lb/>
far as to fix their eyes exclusively in the <gap/>
far as to fix their eyes exclusively in the <sic>humean</sic>
<lb/>
<lb/>
beings throwing out the sticks and stones : [conquered
beings throwing out the sticks and stones : [conquered
Line 25: Line 22:
<del>In</del> men not conquered by him - English men can not . ]
<del>In</del> men not conquered by him - English men can not . ]
<lb/>
<lb/>
In 176<!-- unfinished date ? --> <!-- white space --> Lord Mansfield and his colleagues had not
In 176<gap/><!-- unfinished date ? --> <!-- white space --> Lord Mansfield and his colleagues had not
<lb/>
<lb/>
it <unclear>should</unclear> <add>it appears</add> seem got further .
it <gap/> <add>it appears</add> seem got further .
<lb/></p>
<lb/></p>


Line 37: Line 34:
upon both heads . <del><gap/></del> Upon Englishmen no legislation
upon both heads . <del><gap/></del> Upon Englishmen no legislation
<lb/>
<lb/>
by the King along , even by their <del><gap/></del> consent .
by the King along , even by their <del><unclear>own</unclear></del> consent .
<lb/>
<lb/>
without <add>special</add> consent <add>consent</add> of Parliament : and this upon the
without <add>special</add> consent <add>consent</add> of Parliament : and this upon the
Line 43: Line 40:
authority of <unclear>Magan</unclear><!-- or, 'Magun' ? --> Charlie , and the S<hi rend='superscript'>t</hi> Albans case
authority of <unclear>Magan</unclear><!-- or, 'Magun' ? --> Charlie , and the S<hi rend='superscript'>t</hi> Albans case
<lb/>
<lb/>
<add>the case derided in the 08 Year of Elizabeth</add> which throwing out the stocks and stones bears directly
<add>the case derided in the <unclear>08</unclear> Year of Elizabeth</add> which throwing out the stocks and stones bears directly
<lb/>
<lb/>
upon this point .  Upon <unclear>foreigness</unclear> conquered by Englishmen
upon this point .  Upon <unclear>foreigners</unclear> conquered by Englishmen
<lb/>
<lb/>
and by <del><gap/></del> such conquest made subjects of
and by <del><gap/></del> such conquest made subjects of
Line 51: Line 48:
the King of England no legislation neither : and this
the King of England no legislation neither : and this
<lb/>
<lb/>
upon the authority of <add>principles laid down in the</add> the Bill of Rights : because
upon the authority of <add>principles laid down in</add> the Bill of Rights : because
<lb/>
<lb/>
legislation over a foreign <del>dominion countr</del> <add>set of foreign inhabitants</add> subjected
legislation over a foreign <del>dominion countr</del> <add>set of foreign inhabitants</add> subjected
<lb/>
<lb/>
to <gap/> governance by English terms , given him either
to <unclear>her</unclear> governance by English terms , given him either
<lb/>
<lb/>
<del>in fact or at command</del> at the present time or any future
<del>in fact or at command</del> at the present time or any future

Revision as of 20:31, 6 July 2012

Click Here To Edit


24 July 1802 N . S . Wales Conduct

2 III Non-exist. proved

Already in 1722 these two great lawyers , answering
from their Chambers merely , as consulted Advocates
not from the Westminster Hall as Judges - had got so
far as to fix their eyes exclusively in the humean
beings throwing out the sticks and stones : [conquered
men may be legislated upon by him <add>men conquered under the command of the King of England</add> without their own consent . -
In men not conquered by him - English men can not . ]
In 176 Lord Mansfield and his colleagues had not
it it appears seem got further .

Yet in 1722 , much more in 17674 the sticks and stones being bud out of the question , grounds
surely were not waiting for a very different decision
upon both heads . Upon Englishmen no legislation
by the King along , even by their own consent .
without special consent consent of Parliament : and this upon the
authority of Magan Charlie , and the St Albans case
the case derided in the 08 Year of Elizabeth which throwing out the stocks and stones bears directly
upon this point . Upon foreigners conquered by Englishmen
and by such conquest made subjects of
the King of England no legislation neither : and this
upon the authority of principles laid down in the Bill of Rights : because
legislation over a foreign dominion countr set of foreign inhabitants subjected
to her governance by English terms , given him either
in fact or at command at the present time or any future
time at his pleasure a standing an army , and a separate
purse , both of them obtainable without and
against consent of Parliament .



Identifier: | JB/116/145/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 116.

Date_1

1802-07-24

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

116

Main Headings

panopticon versus new south wales

Folio number

145

Info in main headings field

n. s. wales

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[monogram] 1800]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1800

Notes public

ID Number

37678

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in