JB/035/029/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/035/029/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
JFoxe (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/035/029/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/035/029/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>From p. 4. near the top<!-- in pencil --></head>
 
<note>Juries <!-- section symbol --> 3. <gap/> defects<!-- in pencil --></note> <del>How different in this respect is the situat</del> <add>Upon what different ground in <del>po</del> this respect</add> <note>11 2. by the <gap/> of the law of <hi rend='underline'>public opinion</hi> &#x2014; owing to the security <add>&amp; responsibility</add> by which the Jurors conduct is <gap/><!-- in pencil --></note> <add>How different the security for probity on the part of</add><lb/>
stands the probity of the Juryman and that of the<lb/>
<del>In respect of In as far as depends on such</del><lb/>
<del>still more efficient</del> <add>permanent, elective, remarkable and single Judge? The</add>
<del>checks as are afforded by the law of public opinion</del><lb/>
<del>the comparison is still more to the disadvantage</del><lb/>
<del>of the Jury. <add>this occasional sort of Judge.</add></del>





Revision as of 14:54, 9 July 2012

Click Here To Edit

From p. 4. near the top

Juries 3. defects How different in this respect is the situat Upon what different ground in po this respect 11 2. by the of the law of public opinion — owing to the security & responsibility by which the Jurors conduct is How different the security for probity on the part of
stands the probity of the Juryman and that of the
In respect of In as far as depends on such
still more efficient permanent, elective, remarkable and single Judge? The checks as are afforded by the law of public opinion
the comparison is still more to the disadvantage
of the Jury. this occasional sort of Judge.




Identifier: | JB/035/029/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 35.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

11-12

Box

035

Main Headings

constitutional code; evidence; procedure code

Folio number

029

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f5 / f6

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

l munn

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

benjamin constant

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

10622

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in