JB/095/054/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/095/054/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/095/054/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/095/054/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>TURNPIKE ACT .  <del>Supl</del> General Precedent for Subsequent ones, not present.</head><lb/> <p>Let therefore this General Act be the standing precedent <lb/> as far as it extends fo all particular<lb/> Acts: <add>to be</add> adoptedof course for all future [ones]:<lb/> But <add>I say future ones;</add> <add>without <del>the position</del> <add>a resolution of</add> the Trustees .</add> to be <gap/> in the room of former<lb/> ones. <del> Because</del><lb/> <del>the former ones are whatever they are, they originally<lb/><gap/> of and <gap/> with</del><lb/> For <add>in point of instance the new</add> <del>either</del> Precedent will either be different<lb/> from any <gap/> former one or it will not: if<lb/> not then in this respect <del>there is not <gap/><gap/></del> <gap/> <lb/>it is of no use: if iot be, then this would<lb/> be a new <gap/> for the Trustees and other<lb/> persons concerned to learn, whihc is a <gap/><lb/> and the advantage <gap/> may <gap/> <lb/>to be but trifling if they do not think it worth<lb/> their while to apply for it - I mean supposing <lb/>the mod of application be made easy, &amp; not<lb/> like that for obtaining a <gap/>in the common <lb/>course - abare resolution properly authenticated<lb/>&amp; recorded would be sufficient. <lb/></p> <p>I have said <gap/><gap/> of <gap/> : for in<gap/></p> <pb/> <p>of <gap/> it may be presumed <add><gap/></add> that an Act<lb/> drawn up under these <del>advantages</del> <add>circumstances</add> <del>will</del> <add>might</add> be <lb/> <gap/> than the subsisting one from some of the<lb/> ambiguities which may <gap/> disputes in<lb/> <gap/> where the advantages might not be<lb/> recognised: tho' the chance of this would <del>not</del> <add>hardly</add> <lb/> be a compensation for the inconvenience of <gap/><lb/> it upon people <add>those for whose benefit <gap/></add> under a presumption of <lb/> their <gap/> will be without it.<lb/></p> <p><add>One might almost say</add> There is the same reason for making a different<lb/> <gap/> Act for everyyear, as for<lb/> suffering a different Turnpike Act for each<lb/> district, as to <gap/> points which are in<lb/> Common.</p> <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
 
 
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 11:12, 18 July 2012

Click Here To Edit

TURNPIKE ACT . Supl General Precedent for Subsequent ones, not present.

Let therefore this General Act be the standing precedent
as far as it extends fo all particular
Acts: to be adoptedof course for all future [ones]:
But I say future ones; without the position <add>a resolution of the Trustees .</add> to be in the room of former
ones. Because
the former ones are whatever they are, they originally
of and with

For in point of instance the new either Precedent will either be different
from any former one or it will not: if
not then in this respect there is not
it is of no use: if iot be, then this would
be a new for the Trustees and other
persons concerned to learn, whihc is a
and the advantage may
to be but trifling if they do not think it worth
their while to apply for it - I mean supposing
the mod of application be made easy, & not
like that for obtaining a in the common
course - abare resolution properly authenticated
& recorded would be sufficient.

I have said of  : for in


---page break---

of it may be presumed that an Act
drawn up under these advantages circumstances will might be
than the subsisting one from some of the
ambiguities which may disputes in
where the advantages might not be
recognised: tho' the chance of this would not hardly
be a compensation for the inconvenience of
it upon people those for whose benefit under a presumption of
their will be without it.

One might almost say There is the same reason for making a different
Act for everyyear, as for
suffering a different Turnpike Act for each
district, as to points which are in
Common.


Identifier: | JB/095/054/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 95.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

095

Main Headings

Folio number

054

Info in main headings field

turnpike act general precedent for subsequent ones, not present

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [lion with vryheyt motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

30940

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in