★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
20-Jul-2012: under construction by Diane Folan. Please do not amend. | 20-Jul-2012: under construction by Diane Folan. Please do not amend. | ||
<head>PROCEDURE - <add>Summary</add> View . Conviction on — State of the question concerning the expediency of allowing.</head> | <head>PROCEDURE - <add>Summary</add> View . Conviction on — State of the question concerning the expediency of allowing.</head> | ||
<p>Of all modes of judiciary demonstration , <unclear>Vices</unclear><add>[+]</add> | <p>Of all modes of judiciary demonstration , <unclear>Vices</unclear><add>[+]</add> <note><add>{+]</add> <sic>consider'd</sic> merely with reference to the magistrate himself as a means of information</note> | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
ie : of the Magistrate is manifestly the most | ie : of the Magistrate is manifestly the most | ||
Line 28: | Line 29: | ||
<lb/></p> | <lb/></p> | ||
<p>At every separation of characters <add>functions</add> thus necessary | <p><note>distribution</note> At every separation of characters <add>functions</add> thus necessary | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
to concur towards the constatement of the fact | to concur towards the constatement of the fact | ||
Line 52: | Line 53: | ||
<add>polished</add> nation ; least of all is it in our's . | <add>polished</add> nation ; least of all is it in our's . | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
The applying<add>+</add> a check to the corrupt affections | The applying<add>+</add> <note><add>+</add> punishing — administering , affording</note> a check to the corrupt affections | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
which may influence every judge, as they | which may influence every judge, as they | ||
Line 58: | Line 59: | ||
may every man — by holding up the same | may every man — by holding up the same | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
lights<add>//</add><!-- vertical parallel lines, not forward-slashes --> to <del>others</del> <add>- number</add> of persons besides , that are | lights<add>//</add><!-- vertical parallel lines, not forward-slashes --> <note>//<!-- pair of parallel lines --> determinatives</note> to <del>others</del> <add>- number</add> of persons besides , that are | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
presented to the judge <add>they are</add> thus enabled to judge from | presented to the judge <add>they are</add> thus enabled to judge from | ||
Line 80: | Line 81: | ||
<p>According to an absurd doctrine laid down in | <p>According to an absurd doctrine laid down in | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
12 Mod. 688. An Act of Parliament <del>< | 12 Mod. 688. An Act of Parliament <del><unclear>presenting</unclear></del> <add>allowing | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
of</add> Conviction on | of</add> Conviction on View should <add>is</add> be void: | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
for an Act of Parliament is void says the | for an Act of Parliament is void says the | ||
Line 99: | Line 100: | ||
for acquittal in view , has in no instance that | for acquittal in view , has in no instance that | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
I ever heard of been appointed <add>+</add>) from <del>[</del> the [<gap/> | I ever heard of been appointed <add>+</add> <note>+ is a thing <unclear>I</unclear> suppose , unknown.</note>) from <del>[</del> the [<gap/> | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
of these formalities and] aggregating of this distinct | of these formalities and] aggregating of this distinct | ||
Line 135: | Line 136: | ||
way , & when <add>only</add> in the common one. <note>Upon this state of the question</note> | way , & when <add>only</add> in the common one. <note>Upon this state of the question</note> | ||
<lb/></p> | <lb/></p> | ||
<!-- horizontal line --> | |||
<pb/> | |||
<p>They who think the <del>first danger the greatest</del> <note>depending upon <del>this</del> <add>a given</add> <del><gap/></del><!-- insert here, or prior to (added from below) the first word in this note - 'depending' ? --> offence <del>in question</del> <add>together</add> with its punishment</note> <add><gap/> of pain within</add> a given | |||
<lb/> | |||
period in the first case , has been or could be | |||
<lb/> | |||
greater than in the second , must be of opinion | |||
<lb/> | |||
that Conviction on View ought not to be <sic>allowd</sic> | |||
<lb/> | |||
of for that offence — they who think the contrary | |||
<lb/> | |||
must be of opinion that it ought . | |||
<lb/></p> | |||
<head>PROCEDURE <add>Summary</add> View conviction on — State of the question concern-/<!-- vertical line, not forward-slash --> [-ing the expediency of allowing.</head> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} |
20-Jul-2012: under construction by Diane Folan. Please do not amend.
PROCEDURE - Summary View . Conviction on — State of the question concerning the expediency of allowing.
Of all modes of judiciary demonstration , Vices[+] {+] consider'd merely with reference to the magistrate himself as a means of information
ie : of the Magistrate is manifestly the most
compleat — In this case the several characters
of Prosecutor Witness and Judge are
in his single person . characters such , that it
following entirely to the imperfection of the
human faculties that they are ever separated permitted
in separation : which united in beings
such as are by accident , are by essence united in the
allperfect judge. [in virtue of] by his essence .
distribution At every separation of characters functions thus necessary
to concur towards the constatement of the fact
in question , a fresh degree of uncertainty is produced .
It is only because he cannot always see every thing
with his own eyes , that the Magistrate is permitted
to see any thing with the eyes of others .
But the enlightening of the Magistrate is not
the sole end of the formalities of Procedure . It —
scarcely is in the Jurisprudence of any civilized
---page break---
polished nation ; least of all is it in our's .
The applying+ + punishing — administering , affording a check to the corrupt affections
which may influence every judge, as they
may every man — by holding up the same
lights// // determinatives to others - number of persons besides , that are
presented to the judge they are thus enabled to judge from
the force sentiment of those determinatives upon themselves
and from that of their own conclusion in consequence ,
whether it was by the same determinatives
that the has conclusion was governed — (as it
ought to be) or by other sinister ones , irrevelant irrelative
to the merits.
---page break---
According to an absurd doctrine laid down in
12 Mod. 688. An Act of Parliament presenting allowing
of Conviction on View should is be void:
for an Act of Parliament is void says the
Court , that, makes the same person both Judge
and party .
---page break---
There is always therefore a certain contingent danger contingent mischief in the <add>danger in a certain degree</add></add> of
undue punishment (not of undue discharge undue )
for acquittal in view , has in no instance that
I ever heard of been appointed + + is a thing I suppose , unknown.) from [ the [
of these formalities and] aggregating of this distinct
functions to that of the Judge.
There is on the other hand also a contingent evil
in the danger of undue impunity from the want
of their being thus aggregated .
Now of these 2 evils the lst is to the second , as the
number pain resulting from the number of in the 3 stages of it's progress through
the community , the pain I say of produced I say <add>in the case by</add> an instance
of undue punishment for the offence , multiplied by the number
of instances in which it may be reported
& that product by the chances for it's being
repeated , is to the pain produced by an
instance of the offence itself , multiplied by the
difference between the chances against it's being
committed when prosecuted in this summary
way , & when only in the common one. Upon this state of the question
---page break---
They who think the first danger the greatest depending upon this a given offence in question together with its punishment of pain within a given
period in the first case , has been or could be
greater than in the second , must be of opinion
that Conviction on View ought not to be allowd
of for that offence — they who think the contrary
must be of opinion that it ought .
PROCEDURE Summary View conviction on — State of the question concern-/ [-ing the expediency of allowing.
Identifier: | JB/050/006/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 50. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
050 |
procedure code |
||
006 |
procedure summary view conviction on - state of the questions concerning the expediency of allowing |
||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
|||
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::[gr with crown] [lion with vryheyt motif]]] |
||
15997 |
|||