JB/050/006/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/050/006/001: Difference between revisions

Diane Folan (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Diane Folan (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:


20-Jul-2012: under construction by Diane Folan.  Please do not amend.
20-Jul-2012: under construction by Diane Folan.  Please do not amend.


<head>PROCEDURE - <add>Summary</add> View .  Conviction on &#x2014; State of the question concerning the expediency of allowing.</head>
<head>PROCEDURE - <add>Summary</add> View .  Conviction on &#x2014; State of the question concerning the expediency of allowing.</head>


<p>Of all modes of judiciary demonstration , <unclear>Vices</unclear><add>[+]</add>
<p>Of all modes of judiciary demonstration , <unclear>Vices</unclear><add>[+]</add> <note><add>{+]</add> <sic>consider'd</sic> merely with reference to the magistrate himself as a means of information</note>
<lb/>
<lb/>
ie : of the Magistrate is manifestly the most  
ie : of the Magistrate is manifestly the most  
Line 28: Line 29:
<lb/></p>
<lb/></p>


<p>At every separation of characters <add>functions</add> thus necessary
<p><note>distribution</note>  At every separation of characters <add>functions</add> thus necessary
<lb/>
<lb/>
to concur towards the constatement of the fact
to concur towards the constatement of the fact
Line 52: Line 53:
<add>polished</add> nation ; least of all is it in our's .
<add>polished</add> nation ; least of all is it in our's .
<lb/>
<lb/>
The applying<add>+</add> a check to the corrupt affections
The applying<add>+</add> <note><add>+</add> punishing &#x2014; administering , affording</note> a check to the corrupt affections
<lb/>
<lb/>
which may influence every judge, as they
which may influence every judge, as they
Line 58: Line 59:
may every man &#x2014; by holding up the same
may every man &#x2014; by holding up the same
<lb/>
<lb/>
lights<add>//</add><!-- vertical parallel lines, not forward-slashes --> to <del>others</del> <add>- number</add> of persons besides , that are
lights<add>//</add><!-- vertical parallel lines, not forward-slashes --> <note>//<!-- pair of parallel lines --> determinatives</note> to <del>others</del> <add>- number</add> of persons besides , that are
<lb/>
<lb/>
presented to the judge <add>they are</add> thus enabled to judge from
presented to the judge <add>they are</add> thus enabled to judge from
Line 80: Line 81:
<p>According to an absurd doctrine laid down in
<p>According to an absurd doctrine laid down in
<lb/>
<lb/>
12 Mod. 688.  An Act of Parliament <del><gap/></del> <add>allowing  
12 Mod. 688.  An Act of Parliament <del><unclear>presenting</unclear></del> <add>allowing  
<lb/>
<lb/>
of</add> Conviction on <gap/><!-- 'View' ? -->should <add>is</add> be void:
of</add> Conviction on View should <add>is</add> be void:
<lb/>
<lb/>
for an Act of Parliament is void says the
for an Act of Parliament is void says the
Line 99: Line 100:
for acquittal in view , has in no instance that
for acquittal in view , has in no instance that
<lb/>
<lb/>
I ever heard of been appointed <add>+</add>) from <del>[</del> the [<gap/>
I ever heard of been appointed <add>+</add> <note>+ is a thing <unclear>I</unclear> suppose , unknown.</note>) from <del>[</del> the [<gap/>
<lb/>
<lb/>
of these formalities and] aggregating of this distinct  
of these formalities and] aggregating of this distinct  
Line 135: Line 136:
way , &amp; when <add>only</add> in the common one. <note>Upon this state of the question</note>
way , &amp; when <add>only</add> in the common one. <note>Upon this state of the question</note>
<lb/></p>
<lb/></p>
<!-- horizontal line -->
<pb/>
<p>They who think the <del>first danger the greatest</del> <note>depending upon <del>this</del> <add>a given</add> <del><gap/></del><!-- insert here, or prior to (added from below) the first word in this note - 'depending' ? --> offence <del>in question</del> <add>together</add> with its punishment</note> <add><gap/> of pain within</add> a given
<lb/>
period in the first case , has been or could be
<lb/>
greater than in the second , must be of opinion
<lb/>
that Conviction on View ought not to be <sic>allowd</sic>
<lb/>
of for that offence &#x2014; they who think the contrary
<lb/>
must be of opinion that it ought .
<lb/></p>
<head>PROCEDURE <add>Summary</add> View conviction on &#x2014; State of the question concern-/<!-- vertical line, not forward-slash --> [-ing the expediency of allowing.</head>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 18:49, 20 July 2012

Click Here To Edit


20-Jul-2012: under construction by Diane Folan. Please do not amend.


PROCEDURE - Summary View . Conviction on — State of the question concerning the expediency of allowing.

Of all modes of judiciary demonstration , Vices[+] {+] consider'd merely with reference to the magistrate himself as a means of information
ie : of the Magistrate is manifestly the most
compleat — In this case the several characters
of Prosecutor Witness and Judge are
in his single person . characters such , that it
following entirely to the imperfection of the
human faculties that they are ever separated permitted
in separation : which united in beings
such as are by accident , are by essence united in the
allperfect judge. [in virtue of] by his essence .

distribution At every separation of characters functions thus necessary
to concur towards the constatement of the fact
in question , a fresh degree of uncertainty is produced .

It is only because he cannot always see every thing
with his own eyes , that the Magistrate is permitted
to see any thing with the eyes of others .
But the enlightening of the Magistrate is not
the sole end of the formalities of Procedure . It —
scarcely is in the Jurisprudence of any civilized
---page break---
polished nation ; least of all is it in our's .
The applying+ + punishing — administering , affording a check to the corrupt affections
which may influence every judge, as they
may every man — by holding up the same
lights// // determinatives to others - number of persons besides , that are
presented to the judge they are thus enabled to judge from
the force sentiment of those determinatives upon themselves
and from that of their own conclusion in consequence ,
whether it was by the same determinatives
that the has conclusion was governed — (as it
ought to be) or by other sinister ones , irrevelant irrelative
to the merits.


---page break---

According to an absurd doctrine laid down in
12 Mod. 688. An Act of Parliament presenting allowing
of
Conviction on View should is be void:
for an Act of Parliament is void says the
Court , that, makes the same person both Judge
and party .


---page break---

There is always therefore a certain contingent danger contingent mischief in the <add>danger in a certain degree</add></add> of
undue punishment (not of undue discharge undue )
for acquittal in view , has in no instance that
I ever heard of been appointed + + is a thing I suppose , unknown.) from [ the [
of these formalities and] aggregating of this distinct
functions to that of the Judge.

There is on the other hand also a contingent evil
in the danger of undue impunity from the want
of their being thus aggregated .

Now of these 2 evils the lst is to the second , as the
number pain resulting from the number of in the 3 stages of it's progress through
the community , the pain I say of produced I say <add>in the case by</add> an instance
of undue punishment for the offence , multiplied by the number
of instances in which it may be reported
& that product
by the chances for it's being
repeated , is to the pain produced by an
instance of the offence itself , multiplied by the
difference between the chances against it's being
committed when prosecuted in this summary
way , & when only in the common one. Upon this state of the question


---page break---

They who think the first danger the greatest depending upon this a given offence in question together with its punishment of pain within a given
period in the first case , has been or could be
greater than in the second , must be of opinion
that Conviction on View ought not to be allowd
of for that offence — they who think the contrary
must be of opinion that it ought .

PROCEDURE Summary View conviction on — State of the question concern-/ [-ing the expediency of allowing.



Identifier: | JB/050/006/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 50.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

050

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

006

Info in main headings field

procedure summary view conviction on - state of the questions concerning the expediency of allowing

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[gr with crown] [lion with vryheyt motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

15997

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in