JB/096/109/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/096/109/002: Difference between revisions

TB Editor (talk | contribs)
m Unprotected "JB/096/109/002"
Petergh (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/096/109/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/096/109/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Erroneous division. it's Source, and consequences.</head>
 
<p>or [expressly] establish, are [not only different but] contradictory &amp; inconsistent.<lb/>
The Division I mean is that into <del>Divine Law, Natural Law</del>, <add>Law of <del><gap/></del>tion, Law of Nature</add> and<lb/>
<del>Positive</del> Law<del>,</del> Positive or Municipal.</p>
 
Were I to be asked for a Definition of the <add>a</add> state of Nature, I could not give <add><unclear>long</unclear> <gap/></add> <lb/>
a clearer or more characteristic definition of it, than <add>this,</add> that it was <hi rend='underline'>the State in</hi><lb/>
<hi rend='underline'>which Mankind were in, while there was no Law.</hi> And yet the practice of speaking of<lb/>
that State as having a Law, a Law too that is to <sic>controul</sic> and perplex the operation<lb/>
of Positive and real Laws, is become so inveterate, that to <del>deny it's existence</del> <add>contest the propriety</add> <lb/>
of the appellation, must at first <add>sight</add> bear the appearance of <add><del><unclear>nothing</unclear></del></add> a captious refinement <add><gap/>.</add><lb/>
<del><gap/></del> <note>flatter'd with the title of the <unclear>Legislative</unclear> of Mankind, they have called the <unclear>covert</unclear> production of their own <gap/> <add><gap/></add> the Laws of Nature.</note>





Revision as of 12:20, 29 July 2012

Click Here To Edit

Erroneous division. it's Source, and consequences.

or [expressly] establish, are [not only different but] contradictory & inconsistent.
The Division I mean is that into Divine Law, Natural Law, Law of tion, Law of Nature and
Positive Law, Positive or Municipal.

Were I to be asked for a Definition of the a state of Nature, I could not give long
a clearer or more characteristic definition of it, than this, that it was the State in
which Mankind were in, while there was no Law. And yet the practice of speaking of
that State as having a Law, a Law too that is to controul and perplex the operation
of Positive and real Laws, is become so inveterate, that to deny it's existence contest the propriety
of the appellation, must at first sight bear the appearance of nothing a captious refinement .
flatter'd with the title of the Legislative of Mankind, they have called the covert production of their own the Laws of Nature.




Identifier: | JB/096/109/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

096

Main Headings

legislation

Folio number

109

Info in main headings field

introd. law - division into natural, divine and municipal

Image

002

Titles

erroneous division - its source, and consequences

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[gr with crown] [britannia with shield motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

31113

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in