JB/116/149/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/116/149/001: Difference between revisions

Diane Folan (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Diane Folan (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:




07-Jul-2012: under construction by Diane Folan.  Please do not amend.
22-Aug-2012: under construction by Diane Folan.  Please do not amend.




<head>23 July 1802</head><!-- aligned to the left-hand margin -->
<head>23 July 1802</head><!-- aligned to the left-hand margin -->
<head>N. S. Wales  <note>Conduct</note></head><!-- all in pencil -->
<head>N. S. Wales  <note>Conduct</note></head><!-- 'N. S. Wales' centred.  All in pencil -->


<head>10  <note>III . Non-<unclear>existenc</unclear>-<sic>provd</sic></note></head><!-- all in pencil -->
<head>10  <note>III . Non-<unclear>existenc-proved</unclear></note></head><!-- all in pencil -->


<p><!-- indented --><note>1  <hi rend='underline'><unclear>dissol</unclear></hi>  An adjudication that the King had a right to legislate in Granada would not apply to New South Wales  To Non-British it is no hardship &#x2014; not against <gap/> <gap/><!-- looks like 'Major/Majan Charles' --></note><!-- note in pencil -->  Were the existence of such a right affirmed by a
<p><!-- indented --><note>1  <hi rend='underline'><unclear>dissol</unclear></hi>  An adjudication that the King had a right to legisla<unclear>te</unclear> in Granada would not apply to New South Wales . To Non-British it is no hardship &#x2014; not against <gap/> <gap/><!-- looks like 'Major/Majan Charles' ? --></note><!-- note in pencil -->  Were the existence of such a right affirmed by a
<lb/>
<lb/>
direct decision , and that decision <add>unimpeached , and</add> held for law , the claim
direct decision , and that decision <add>unimpeached , and</add> held for law , the claim
Line 29: Line 29:
to the one has no application to the other.  The  
to the one has no application to the other.  The  
<lb/>
<lb/>
people of <del>England not to entangle the case with <gap/>]
people of <del>England</del> <add>these Islands</add> <del>(not to entangle the case with <gap/>]
<lb/>
<lb/>
The people of England</del> have been habituated to a mixed
The people of England</del> have been habituated to a mixed
<lb/>
<lb/>
government in which <del>the deputees from</del> <add><del>among themselves</del></add> <del>the community at
government in which <del>the deputees from</del> <add><del>among themselves</del> <add>individuals chosen by and from among themselves</add></add> <del>the community at
<lb/>
<lb/>
large</del> <del>have a <del>pri</del></del> <add><del>principal</del></add>  <del>considerable share</del><!-- deleted in pencil --> <del>: to them</del> it would <add>possess an important share : to <unclear>mind</unclear><!-- or, 'mend' --> , <unclear>those</unclear><!-- or, 'these' --> disciplined</add>
large</del> <del>have a <del>pri</del></del> <add><del>principal</del> possess an important share : to <unclear>mind</unclear><!-- or, 'mend' --> , <unclear>those</unclear><!-- or 'these' ? --> disciplined</add> <del>considerable share</del><!-- deleted in pencil --> <del>: to them</del> it would
<lb/>
<lb/>
be a hardship to <del>lead <add>dwell</add> their lives</del> under a <del>different</del> <add>less <gap/> <add>temperate</add></add>
be a hardship to <del>lead</del> <add>dwell</add> <del>their lives</del> under a <del>different</del> <add>less <gap/> <add>temperate</add></add>
<lb/>
<lb/>
<del><unclear>host</unclear></del> <add>form</add> of government .  People from the other colonizing
<del><unclear>host</unclear></del> <add>form</add> of government .  People from the other colonizing
<lb/>
<lb/>
Countries have no such <add>habits or</add> priviliges : <del><gap/></del> not to have them
Countries have no such <add>habits or</add> privileges : <del><gap/></del> not to have them
<lb/>
<lb/>
in future is at any rate not a new hardship , probably
in future is at any rate not a new hardship , probably
Line 47: Line 47:
not a hardship at all.  <del>The people of</del> <add>Even in</add> England <add>the people</add> are
not a hardship at all.  <del>The people of</del> <add>Even in</add> England <add>the people</add> are
<lb/>
<lb/>
<add>perhaps</add> not so universally satisfied with their own <add>most carefully</add> limitist
<add>perhaps</add> not so universally satisfied with their own <add>most carefully</add> limitest
<lb/>
<lb/>
and exquisitely constructed <del>Government</del> <add>constitution ,</add> , as the people of
and exquisitely constructed <del>Government</del> <add>constitution ,</add> , as the people of
<lb/>
<lb/>
<lb/>
proof reading from here ...
<lb/>
<lb/>
Denmark are with a form of government which if it
Denmark are with a form of government which if it
<lb/>
<lb/>
Line 61: Line 73:
and concisely have <add>all in our , <hi rend='underline'>the</hi> people of England <unclear>those</unclear><!-- or, 'these' -->  Islands</add> their <gap/> Charlie , their Bill of
and concisely have <add>all in our , <hi rend='underline'>the</hi> people of England <unclear>those</unclear><!-- or, 'these' -->  Islands</add> their <gap/> Charlie , their Bill of
<lb/>
<lb/>
Rights and so forth : in no <gap/> Colonizing nation <del>is</del> <add><del>was</del> <add>were</add></add>  
Rights and so forth : in no other Colonizing nation <unclear><del>is</del></unclear> <add><del>was</del> <add>were</add></add>  
<lb/>
<unclear>there</unclear> (<del>was</del> <add>we</add> using add or <del><gap/></del> <add>are</add> there <add>yet</add>) any such <del>thing</del> body of
<lb/>
<lb/>
<gap/> (<gap/>  
<add>constitutional securities -</add> 
<lb/></p>


 
<p><!-- indented -->These <unclear>comprised</unclear> people , having at the time of the conquest
 
<lb/>
 
<del>being</del> <add>been</add> <hi rend='underline'>enemie</hi>s , must <add>therefore</add> be contented with their <hi rend='underline'>capitulations</hi>
<lb/>
if received into subjection before the <add>peace</add> treaty , or with the <hi rend='underline'>stipulations</hi>,
<lb/>
made in favour of them <add>by the treaty</add> , if <unclear>ended</unclear><!-- or, 'aided' ? --> by <del>the treaty</del> it without previous <add>occupation .</add>
<lb/></p>
<lb/></p>



Revision as of 10:59, 22 August 2012

Click Here To Edit


22-Aug-2012: under construction by Diane Folan. Please do not amend.


23 July 1802 N. S. Wales Conduct

10 III . Non-existenc-proved

1 dissol An adjudication that the King had a right to legislate in Granada would not apply to New South Wales . To Non-British it is no hardship — not against Were the existence of such a right affirmed by a
direct decision , and that decision unimpeached , and held for law , the claim
of such a right in New South Wales would not derive
the any slightest colour from it . In point of The case of an inhabi
a Colony already inhabited by Colonists habituated to a
government of their own is so perfectly distinct from
a Colony peopled solely by British subjects habituated
Briti British laws that [+] [+] as far as the actions of the Colony that is of its inhabitants what any argument applying
to the one has no application to the other. The
people of England these Islands (not to entangle the case with ]
The people of England
have been habituated to a mixed
government in which the deputees from among themselves <add>individuals chosen by and from among themselves</add> the community at
large
have a pri principal possess an important share : to mind , those disciplined considerable share : to them it would
be a hardship to lead dwell their lives under a different less <add>temperate</add>
host form of government . People from the other colonizing
Countries have no such habits or privileges : not to have them
in future is at any rate not a new hardship , probably
not a hardship at all. The people of Even in England the people are
perhaps not so universally satisfied with their own most carefully limitest
and exquisitely constructed Government constitution , , as the people of

proof reading from here ...

Denmark are with a form of government which if it
differs from that of Morocco differs rather as far as by the <add>modes of thinking</add>
the power of by manners than by laws . in of all ranks than by the power of the Sovereign . The people
of England in a word
In a word - to To speak it can popularly
and concisely have all in our , the people of England those Islands their Charlie , their Bill of
Rights and so forth : in no other Colonizing nation is was <add>were</add>
there (was we using add or are there yet) any such thing body of
constitutional securities -

These comprised people , having at the time of the conquest
being been enemies , must therefore be contented with their capitulations
if received into subjection before the peace treaty , or with the stipulations,
made in favour of them by the treaty , if ended by the treaty it without previous occupation .



Identifier: | JB/116/149/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 116.

Date_1

1802-07-23

Marginal Summary Numbering

[[marginal_summary_numbering::1 [or] 8]]

Box

116

Main Headings

panopticon versus new south wales

Folio number

149

Info in main headings field

n. s. wales

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e10

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[monogram] 1800]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1800

Notes public

ID Number

37682

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in