JB/079/021/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/079/021/001: Difference between revisions

Lea Stern (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Lea Stern (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 20: Line 20:


<head>2</head>
<head>2</head>
<p>now called Sections: these Sections have nothing to fix <lb/>contents either absolutely or relatively <lb/>to each other: that <add><gap/></add> which caused it if<lb/> 50 Sections might as well have been in a hundred<lb/> or as well in only 5: without <del>its being in any <lb/>one:</del> <add>any one's having <gap/></add><lb/> <del>forever to quizz <add><gap/></add></del> any more <gap/> charge <add>to wage</add> against<lb/> it in the two cases, those that he thought in the <lb/>first there were too many, in the <del>latter <gap/></del> <add>last too few</add> <lb/> Our Sections have the <del>l</del> same principle of <del>unity</del> <add>union</add> <lb/>  
<p>now called Sections: these Sections have nothing to fix <lb/>contents either absolutely or relatively <lb/>to each other: that <add><gap/></add> which caused it if<lb/> 50 Sections might as well have been in a hundred<lb/> or as well in only 5: without <del>its being in any <lb/>one:</del> <add>any one's having <gap/></add><lb/> <del>forever to quizz <add><gap/></add></del> any more <gap/> charge <add>to wage</add> against<lb/> it in the two cases, those that he thought in the <lb/>first there were too many, in the <del>latter <gap/></del> <add>last too few</add> <lb/> Our Sections have the <del>l</del> same principle of <del>unity</del> <add>union</add><lb/> to <del><gap/> their interests</del> <add>for the parts of each &amp; of division</add> from each other as<lb/> the whole Laws themselves: that principle being <lb/><hi rend='underline'>person</hi> in such Laws whose principle of unity <lb/>is <hi rend='underline'>subject matter</hi>; &amp; <gap/> <hi rend='underline'>subject matter,<lb/> in such whose <add>where it is </add>principle of unity is person.</hi>  





Revision as of 15:32, 24 August 2012

Click Here To Edit

1
Notoriety Scheme of Division distribution for the purposes of ...

The Laws whose principle of unity union is a certain
subject matter, + + is a certain end as is the — seen in the Militia order may be stiled the Aggregate
Laws; in contradistinction to the others whose
principle of unity is a certain denomination
of person; which latter may be stiled the Personal
Laws — The Personal Laws will consist of
one part some part of one at least, commonly of
many Aggregate Laws, analyzed resolved for this
purpose into a number of sections correspondent
to the number of personal persons of different description
conversant upon them the <add>this subject</add> matter of such aggregate
Law, the sections so resolved, recompounded into a new whole: whose
principle of unity is, person.

Hence in each kind we get obtain a new division
antecedent to the ultimate which at present is
the only one & that not authentic, viz: into what are


---page break---

-ject matter as falls under the loose regulation,
will in that case form the a whole Personal
Law: if he is conversant with many, as is
more commonly the case, his Law must wait for
it's completion till the publication of the last
Aggregate Law of those containing any thing respecting that person that shall be compiled.

Each Aggregate therefore, however subject to subsequent
alteration as it is the nature of every
Law to be) is at the time it's very first appearance
perfect certain & compleat. It will be furnished with its
Sections all at once . . Most Personal Laws..

... they will be furnished with their Sections
piecemeal.

The Legislator may preface the one at the very
first with this comfortable that it is not
only the Law but the whole Law: He can surely
do so by the other
Promulgation. Distribution for the purposes of _ Sections.


---page break---

2

now called Sections: these Sections have nothing to fix
contents either absolutely or relatively
to each other: that which caused it if
50 Sections might as well have been in a hundred
or as well in only 5: without its being in any
one:
any one's having
forever to quizz any more charge to wage against
it in the two cases, those that he thought in the
first there were too many, in the latter last too few
Our Sections have the l same principle of unity union
to their interests for the parts of each & of division from each other as
the whole Laws themselves: that principle being
person in such Laws whose principle of unity
is subject matter; & subject matter,
in such whose where it is principle of unity is person.
'

Identifier: | JB/079/021/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 79.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

not numbered

Box

079

Main Headings

Folio number

021

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

notes

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e6 / e7

Penner

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[gr with crown motif] propatria [britannia motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

25463

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in