★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/079/067/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/079/067/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
'' | <del><head>9</head></del> RC<lb/> <p> In most lamentable wise complainith S<hi rend='superscript'>r</hi> Harbottle Grimstone<lb/> Knight Editor of Croke's Reports & on the accession<lb/> of King. ch: 2. Master of the Rolls a practice commenced<lb/>in his time, in contempt <add>violation</add> of a legal formality; which formality<lb/>according to his notion was one of the essentials of the Law<lb/>itself " a practicesays he " whereby the majesty of the <lb/>"Law is <sic>prophaned</sic>, the authority of Reports lessen'd and<lb/>"the matters in their Books render'd less usful to the<lb/>"Students<hi rend='superscript'>7</hi> - Not to keep the readers in suspense concerning<lb/>the object of this tragical Anticlimax it is in plain English<lb/> neither more nor less than the printing of Law Books like<pb/> <note>The printing of the Law Reports in their proper Letter and Native Language. What he means by their nativelanguage it is not easy to say. if it be French, the Reports of which he complains as weell as that vey publication of his own which he is prefacing are printed in English.</note> other Books: the changing of that <unclear>terrific</unclear> Letter <add>Type</add> which <unclear>oversforced</unclear><lb/> the whole page in the form, as it were, of one uninterrupted<lb/> Blotch, into that upon the Roman Model, <add>from</add> in which the<lb/> Eye receives all sorts of assistances towards the distinguishing <add>the several mechanical <gap/></add><lb/> of Words, Lines and Paragraphs <add>several portions into which a pageis mechanically divided</add>. </p> <p>At the time in which he wrote <note><add>The acts of the Legislation today the best defined <add>most</add> &most conspicuous <add>authoritative</add> unquestionable portions o the Law, were composed in English.</add></note>, Instruments <add>if used in the course</add> of procedure<lb/> as Writs, Orders Warrants and the Records or formal Histories <add>of</add> the several Suits werein Latin.</p> <p> Extrajudicial <add>Uncontentious</add> amcable transactions as Conveyances were in<lb/> English - the arguments of Council upon all those topics as<lb/> well as the infinite variety of others which the Law affords<lb/> were in English; minutes of those arguments were taken </p><lb/> <head>PROMULGATION. Grimstone</head> <pb/> <p> down by auditors for publication or for their own use in<lb/> <add>a</add> mongrel jarggon which was called French <add>to which was given the name of &</add> of these 3 -<lb/> [languages] Latin, French and English which then did<lb/> he understnad by the native language of the Law? </p> <p> The Arguments on their verdicts are perpetually founded<lb/> on the supposition of their knowing how the Law stands <add>For example Lord Mansfield /in 3 Burrow 1264/ Six were indicted: 2 of them are acquitted; 2 aredead, untried. The Jury have found these [those] 2 to be guilty of a Riot: consequently it must have been together with those 2 who have never been tried, as it could not otherwise be a Riot.</add> <!-- This addition is at the bottom of the column --> <lb/> a supposition must frequently be <add>which is seldom verified</add> They have the Judge<lb/> <add>indeed</add> to answer their questions, but it requires a certain degree of<lb/> knowledge <add>even</add> to form doubts: sheer ignorance asks no questions<lb/> the Judge may happen to think it necessary to give them<lb/> Information or he may not.</p><pb/> <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | |||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} |
9 RC
In most lamentable wise complainith Sr Harbottle Grimstone
Knight Editor of Croke's Reports & on the accession
of King. ch: 2. Master of the Rolls a practice commenced
in his time, in contempt violation of a legal formality; which formality
according to his notion was one of the essentials of the Law
itself " a practicesays he " whereby the majesty of the
"Law is prophaned, the authority of Reports lessen'd and
"the matters in their Books render'd less usful to the
"Students7 - Not to keep the readers in suspense concerning
the object of this tragical Anticlimax it is in plain English
neither more nor less than the printing of Law Books like
---page break---
The printing of the Law Reports in their proper Letter and Native Language. What he means by their nativelanguage it is not easy to say. if it be French, the Reports of which he complains as weell as that vey publication of his own which he is prefacing are printed in English. other Books: the changing of that terrific Letter Type which oversforced
the whole page in the form, as it were, of one uninterrupted
Blotch, into that upon the Roman Model, from in which the
Eye receives all sorts of assistances towards the distinguishing the several mechanical
of Words, Lines and Paragraphs several portions into which a pageis mechanically divided.
At the time in which he wrote The acts of the Legislation today the best defined <add>most &most conspicuous authoritative unquestionable portions o the Law, were composed in English.</add>, Instruments if used in the course of procedure
as Writs, Orders Warrants and the Records or formal Histories of the several Suits werein Latin.
Extrajudicial Uncontentious amcable transactions as Conveyances were in
English - the arguments of Council upon all those topics as
well as the infinite variety of others which the Law affords
were in English; minutes of those arguments were taken
PROMULGATION. Grimstone
---page break---
down by auditors for publication or for their own use in
a mongrel jarggon which was called French to which was given the name of & of these 3 -
[languages] Latin, French and English which then did
he understnad by the native language of the Law?
The Arguments on their verdicts are perpetually founded
on the supposition of their knowing how the Law stands For example Lord Mansfield /in 3 Burrow 1264/ Six were indicted: 2 of them are acquitted; 2 aredead, untried. The Jury have found these [those] 2 to be guilty of a Riot: consequently it must have been together with those 2 who have never been tried, as it could not otherwise be a Riot.
a supposition must frequently be which is seldom verified They have the Judge
indeed to answer their questions, but it requires a certain degree of
knowledge even to form doubts: sheer ignorance asks no questions
the Judge may happen to think it necessary to give them
Information or he may not.
---page break---
Identifier: | JB/079/067/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 79. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
079 |
|||
067 |
promulgation grimstone |
||
001 |
|||
copy/fair copy sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
[[page_numbering::a5[?]]] |
||
[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [britannia with shield motif]]] |
|||
25509 |
|||