JB/079/074/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/079/074/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/079/074/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/079/074/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>3    <unclear>RS6</unclear></head><lb/> <p> The Title of an Indemnity Act <note><add>4 G.2.c.6.</add></note> supposes the neglects<lb/> against the consequences of which it indemnifies to have<lb/>been incurred through "ignorance of Law" - The way to<lb/> cure ignorance is to communicate <add>give</add> <add>bestow</add> information <add>instuction</add>.</p> <p> At . . . . Assizes ....Circuit . . .<lb/>A.D. 176 . . a Man was convicted on the . . . <lb/>. . . . .  for . . . . . . . . . <lb/>At thatvery time there was no such Act in being, it having<lb/>been repealed by .. .. . . . . . . . </p> <p> Is it the Judge on whom we ought <del><gap/></del> <add>to</add> cast the blame<lb/> of this misfortune, or the Jurisprudence?  This the Public<lb/>will be the better enabled to decide when they consider<pb/> that the Parties,Attorneys, <sic>Council</sic> on both sides acted <lb/> for a series of months under the same ignorance, and<lb/> when they are informed that this Judge was [the late]<lb/> S<hi rend='superscript'>r</hi> Joseph Yates. </p> <pb/> <p> <note>The very possibility of an event like this would be taken away, if, according to the plan here proposed, there were to be never any more than one Law upon any one subject at any one time - The Law on which a man couldbe convicted would not be this or that Law but the Law.</note><lb/> A similar case happened in 17.J.1. <unclear>Pies</unclear>case Hutton 35.</p> <p>  The Deft. had been conviceted on the Statute then<lb/> expired 35 El:7. made for limittingthe number of buildings<lb/> about London a statute which was then expired.</p> <p> From the Laws as at present promulgated &amp; composed<lb/> all that the bulk of the People can collect concerning<lb/> the greater Crimes, is that if a man is guilty of any of </p><lb/> <head>PROMULGATION.  Persons punished on expired Statutes.</head><pb/> <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
 
 
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 12:01, 27 August 2012

Click Here To Edit

3 RS6

The Title of an Indemnity Act 4 G.2.c.6. supposes the neglects
against the consequences of which it indemnifies to have
been incurred through "ignorance of Law" - The way to
cure ignorance is to communicate give bestow information instuction.

At . . . . Assizes ....Circuit . . .
A.D. 176 . . a Man was convicted on the . . .
. . . . . for . . . . . . . . .
At thatvery time there was no such Act in being, it having
been repealed by .. .. . . . . . . .

Is it the Judge on whom we ought to cast the blame
of this misfortune, or the Jurisprudence? This the Public
will be the better enabled to decide when they consider
---page break---
that the Parties,Attorneys, Council on both sides acted
for a series of months under the same ignorance, and
when they are informed that this Judge was [the late]
Sr Joseph Yates.


---page break---

The very possibility of an event like this would be taken away, if, according to the plan here proposed, there were to be never any more than one Law upon any one subject at any one time - The Law on which a man couldbe convicted would not be this or that Law but the Law.
A similar case happened in 17.J.1. Piescase Hutton 35.

The Deft. had been conviceted on the Statute then
expired 35 El:7. made for limittingthe number of buildings
about London a statute which was then expired.

From the Laws as at present promulgated & composed
all that the bulk of the People can collect concerning
the greater Crimes, is that if a man is guilty of any of


PROMULGATION. Persons punished on expired Statutes.
---page break---


Identifier: | JB/079/074/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 79.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

079

Main Headings

Folio number

074

Info in main headings field

promulgation persons punished on expired statutes

Image

001

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [britannia with shield motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

25516

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in