JB/051/206/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/051/206/001: Difference between revisions

JFoxe (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
JFoxe (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 12: Line 12:
<head>Observations on Tit. II. art. 1.</head>
<head>Observations on Tit. II. art. 1.</head>


<p><note><!-- in pencil -->1 Canton judications &#x2014; objections to</note> The provision in this article grounds itself on the <del>pro</del><lb/>
<p>The provision in this article grounds itself on the <del>pro</del><lb/>
author's proposed subdivision of the Departments into<lb/>
author's proposed subdivision of the Departments into<lb/>
Cantons or Sub-sub-divisions, a provision which<lb/>
Cantons or Sub-sub-divisions, a provision which<lb/>
Line 18: Line 18:
National Assembly <add>Legislature</add> was rejected by the National Assembly.</p>
National Assembly <add>Legislature</add> was rejected by the National Assembly.</p>


<p><note><!-- in pencil -->1 Canton judications &#x2014; objections to</note> The objections I have to make to this articles are as<lb/>
follows<lb/>
1. That <del>the</del> <add>a new</add> division into Cantons of equal dimensions<lb/>
is not so convenient as one <del>grow which</del> I<lb/>
have proposed, <del>taking</del> which takes for its basis the<lb/>
old-subsisting division into Parishes. For<lb/>
1. <del>You can not be sure</del> It is not every canton that<lb/>
could afford to defray the <sic>expence</sic> of a Judge appointed<lb/>
2. Though the dimensions of a Canton will in general<lb/>
be so much bigger than those of a parish, you<lb/>
can not in every Canton be sure of finding a man<lb/>
of education already fixed to the spot, as in every<lb/>
Parish you may in the person of the Ecclesiastical<lb/>
Minister.<lb/>
2. That if in any Canton more business should<lb/>
arise than it is possible for any one Court to despatch<lb/>
no <del>provision is made for</del> <add>possibility is provided</add> making any addition to the<lb/>
number. In my plan ample provision is made for<lb/>
this contingency by the powers given to the <del>le</del> subordinate<lb/>
legislative assemblies of appointing additional Judges to the <add>Parochial</add></p>


<pb/>





Revision as of 16:20, 27 August 2012

Click Here To Edit

1

Chap. II. Tit. II Committee's Draught Tit. II

Tit II. Art. 1. There shall be in each Canton a Justice of the Judge of the Peace,
with Title in art. 1. Observations [Prud-hominis] Good-men-and-true
for his Assessors.

Observations on Tit. II. art. 1.

The provision in this article grounds itself on the pro
author's proposed subdivision of the Departments into
Cantons or Sub-sub-divisions, a provision which
as applied to the business of electing electors to the
National Assembly Legislature was rejected by the National Assembly.

1 Canton judications — objections to The objections I have to make to this articles are as
follows
1. That the a new division into Cantons of equal dimensions
is not so convenient as one grow which I
have proposed, taking which takes for its basis the
old-subsisting division into Parishes. For
1. You can not be sure It is not every canton that
could afford to defray the expence of a Judge appointed
2. Though the dimensions of a Canton will in general
be so much bigger than those of a parish, you
can not in every Canton be sure of finding a man
of education already fixed to the spot, as in every
Parish you may in the person of the Ecclesiastical
Minister.
2. That if in any Canton more business should
arise than it is possible for any one Court to despatch
no provision is made for possibility is provided making any addition to the
number. In my plan ample provision is made for
this contingency by the powers given to the le subordinate
legislative assemblies of appointing additional Judges to the Parochial


---page break---




Identifier: | JB/051/206/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 51.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-4

Box

051

Main Headings

evidence; procedure code

Folio number

206

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

chap. ii tit. ii committee's draught

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f1 / f2 / f3 / f4

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::l munn [britannia with shield emblem]]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

benjamin constant

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

16371

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in