JB/051/216/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/051/216/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
JFoxe (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/051/216/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/051/216/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head><!-- in pencil -->41</head>
 
<head><!-- in pencil -->Tit. II. B. &amp; C.</head>
 
<p>To <add>decide to</add> act in any manner without sufficient grounds<lb/>
is not the part of one sort of Court or Board or<lb/>
office more than another: it is the part of a fool,<lb/>
and nothing else. But if you have sufficient<lb/>
grounds before you to decide upon, why not decide?<lb/>
[why decide that you will give no decision, but that<lb/>
a decision may be looked for elsewhere?] I repeat it<lb/>
again: why not decide yourselves? Your decision <add>A decision on your</add><lb/>
<add>part</add> may do good, and it can not possibly do harm.<lb/>
It [may do good and] must have done good if it<lb/>
is acquiesced in by all parties: for what greater<lb/>
good could be done by the most respected Court<lb/>
of Justice? It can not do harm: for if it <add>the decision</add> is<lb/>
not acquiesced in it is appealed from: and<lb/>
then the cause goes of course to the Court whatever<lb/>
it be <del>in which</del> in which you have greater<lb/>
confidence.</p>





Revision as of 16:06, 2 September 2012

Click Here To Edit

41

Tit. II. B. & C.

To decide to act in any manner without sufficient grounds
is not the part of one sort of Court or Board or
office more than another: it is the part of a fool,
and nothing else. But if you have sufficient
grounds before you to decide upon, why not decide?
[why decide that you will give no decision, but that
a decision may be looked for elsewhere?] I repeat it
again: why not decide yourselves? Your decision A decision on your
part may do good, and it can not possibly do harm.
It [may do good and] must have done good if it
is acquiesced in by all parties: for what greater
good could be done by the most respected Court
of Justice? It can not do harm: for if it the decision is
not acquiesced in it is appealed from: and
then the cause goes of course to the Court whatever
it be in which in which you have greater
confidence.




Identifier: | JB/051/216/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 51.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

051

Main Headings

evidence; procedure code

Folio number

216

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f41 / f42 / f43 / f44

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::l munn [britannia with shield emblem]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

benjamin constant

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

16381

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in