JB/079/106/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/079/106/002: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:


<!-- This page is divided into two columns.  The right hand column contains printed text -->
<!-- This page is divided into two columns.  The right hand column contains printed text -->
<head>SECT. II <del>Social</del> <del><gap/></del> Now. TRUSTEES  Orig.</head><lb/> <head>ART IV</head><lb/><p> <note>Publicans disqualified </note> <lb/> No person, while he keeps a house of public entertainment,<lb/>or sells strong drink <add>[liquors] other than medieval</add> by retail, shall act as a <lb/>Trustee </p> <pb/> <head>Observations</head><lb/><head>TRUSTEES<lb/> <note>The laudable &amp; customary caution // <unclear>D</unclear> 36</note><lb/><note>Person or Persons</note> the provident <add>cautious</add> precaution <add><del>provision</del> <add>foresight</add> </add> which having provided <add><del>apr</del> <add>declared</add> </add><lb/> that "no" one "person" who should keep a Public<lb/>House should <gap/> as a Trustee, was not content<lb/> without <del>dealing</del><add>taking <gap/> <add>providing least</add> </add> <del>that <gap/></del> two or more "persons"<lb/><note>of that made</note>  <del>of that employment</del> <add>taking advantage of their</add> numbers to <gap/> into <del><gap/></del> <add><del><gap/><gap/></del> <add>less than unity</add> </add> as a proper one?  In private<lb/> should creep into this office, seems here to be a <lb/> little overseen: for <add>with submission to the learned</add> the danger <del>is very little less</del> <lb/> of <del>the</del> <add><hi rend='underline'>a</hi></add> person's geting in<del>to</del> to be <add><hi rend='underline'>several</hi></add> <hi rend='underline'>Trustees</hi>, after<lb/> being prevented from getting in to be <hi rend='underline'>one</hi> <add>seems to be very little less</add> than <lb/><del>it was    </del>  <add>that</add> , of several persons getting to be <hi rend='underline'>one</hi><lb/> while each of them <del>was</del> <add>remains</add> included. </p><pb/>   <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<head>SECT. II <del>Social</del> <del><gap/></del> Now. TRUSTEES  Orig.</head><lb/> <head>ART IV</head><lb/><p> <note>Publicans disqualified </note> <lb/> No person, while he keeps a house of public entertainment,<lb/>or sells strong drink <add>[liquors] other than medieval</add> by retail, shall act as a <lb/>Trustee </p> <pb/> <head>Observations</head><lb/><head>TRUSTEES</head><lb/> <p><note>The laudable &amp; customary caution // <unclear>D</unclear> 36</note><lb/><note>Person or Persons</note> The provident <add>cautious</add> precaution <add><del>provision</del> <add>foresight</add> </add> which having provided <add><del>apr</del> <add>declared</add> </add><lb/> that "no" one "person" who should keep a Public<lb/>House should <gap/> as a Trustee, was not content<lb/> without <del>dealing</del><add>taking <gap/> <add>providing least</add> </add> <del>that <gap/></del> two or more "persons"<lb/><note>of that made</note>  <del>of that employment</del> <add>taking advantage of their</add> numbers to <gap/> into <del><gap/></del> <add><del><gap/><gap/></del> <add>less than unity</add> </add> <lb/> should creep into this office, seems here to be a <lb/> little overseen: for <add>with submission to the learned</add> the danger <del>is very little less</del> <lb/> of <del>the</del> <add><hi rend='underline'>a</hi></add> person's geting in<del>to</del> to be <add><hi rend='underline'>several</hi></add> <hi rend='underline'>Trustees</hi>, after<lb/> being prevented from getting in to be <hi rend='underline'>one</hi> <add>seems to be very little less</add> than <lb/><del>it was    </del>  <add>that</add> , of several persons getting to be <hi rend='underline'>one</hi><lb/> while each of them <del>was</del> <add>remains</add> included. </p><pb/> <note>False Grammar</note> <lb/> <p> Besides <del>that</del> <add>this the Phrase</add>  "<hi rend='underline'>Persons</hi>" <del>shall not be capable of</del><lb/> farm<del>ing</del> Turnpike Toll <del>during such Time </del> as<lb/> <add>while</add> <hi rend='underline'>he</hi> <del>shall</del> a keeps a Public House, contains an <add>seems an  </add> <lb/> example of <add>that sort of</add> Grammatical concord, which had better <add>that it were</add><lb/> to be <sic>alter'd</sic> <add>better to alter </add> in condescension to the <add>vulgar &amp;</add> illiterate<lb/> who are not sufficiently <sic>familiarized</sic> to the<lb/>subtilties of the Legislative <sic>stile</sic>. </p> <p> A Doubt also may arise <add>whether</add> under the word "her" <note><add>v. D15 in VIII f 6</add></note> <del>a person</del> <lb/> <del>of</del> the female Sex be <del>excluded</del> <add>included</add> and this might be<lb/> a subject for many learned arguments: <note> <add> Those on the negative side would insist worth a high hand on the presumption which the one that is taken <del>of</del> <add>to</add> speechifying this <gap/> also where it is meant to be included <del>could</del> affords, that it was at <del>as</del> meant<lb/><add>to be so  </add> it would<lb/> here: those on the <del>negative</del><add>affirmative</add> would stand upon the party of reason: which party <gap/> <add>more gallant </add> antagonists upon who hashad the honour of a degree at Oxford. </add> </note>: it would<lb/> doubtless be a pleasure to hear these arguments:<lb/>  but as the pleasureof knowing what <gap/> about is<lb/> still greater, it is submitted whether this <unclear>law</unclear><lb/> may not be <sic>alter'd</sic> <del>with</del> <add>to</add> advantage.</p><pb/> <!-- unclear where this paragraph fits --> the ground of the differences of character attending the<lb/>difference of sex <add>gender</add> might dispute<lb/> It ought to be observed <add>This doubt <add><gap/></add> however that the doubt arises</add> arises not from the specification<lb/> of sex being <del>included</del> <add>omitted</add> here, <add>that the doubt arises </add> but from its bing inserted elsewhere. </p> <pb/> <head>Observations</head><lb/> <p> An Adjournment made to any Hourof a Day on which<lb/> the meeting was <hi rend='underline'>not</hi> "appointed to be held " must have<lb/> <del>attended with</del> <add> an</add> extraordinary <del>consequence</del><add> effect:</add> it was high time<lb/> to guard against it. </p><pb/><!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 11:35, 7 September 2012

Click Here To Edit

SECT. II Social Now. TRUSTEES Orig.
ART IV

Publicans disqualified
No person, while he keeps a house of public entertainment,
or sells strong drink [liquors] other than medieval by retail, shall act as a
Trustee


---page break---
Observations
TRUSTEES

The laudable & customary caution // D 36
Person or Persons The provident cautious precaution provision <add>foresight </add> which having provided apr <add>declared </add>
that "no" one "person" who should keep a Public
House should as a Trustee, was not content
without dealingtaking <add>providing least </add> that two or more "persons"
of that made of that employment taking advantage of their numbers to into <add>less than unity </add>
should creep into this office, seems here to be a
little overseen: for with submission to the learned the danger is very little less
of the a person's geting into to be several Trustees, after
being prevented from getting in to be one seems to be very little less than
it was that , of several persons getting to be one
while each of them was remains included.


---page break---
False Grammar

Besides that this the Phrase "Persons" shall not be capable of
farming Turnpike Toll during such Time as
while he shall a keeps a Public House, contains an seems an
example of that sort of Grammatical concord, which had better that it were
to be alter'd better to alter in condescension to the vulgar & illiterate
who are not sufficiently familiarized to the
subtilties of the Legislative stile.

A Doubt also may arise whether under the word "her" v. D15 in VIII f 6 a person
of the female Sex be excluded included and this might be
a subject for many learned arguments: Those on the negative side would insist worth a high hand on the presumption which the one that is taken of <add>to speechifying this also where it is meant to be included could affords, that it was at as meant
to be so it would
here: those on the negativeaffirmative would stand upon the party of reason: which party more gallant antagonists upon who hashad the honour of a degree at Oxford. </add>
: it would
doubtless be a pleasure to hear these arguments:
but as the pleasureof knowing what about is
still greater, it is submitted whether this law
may not be alter'd with to advantage.


---page break---
the ground of the differences of character attending the
difference of sex gender might dispute
It ought to be observed This doubt <add> however that the doubt arises</add> arises not from the specification
of sex being included omitted here, that the doubt arises but from its bing inserted elsewhere.


---page break---
Observations

An Adjournment made to any Hourof a Day on which
the meeting was not "appointed to be held " must have
attended with an extraordinary consequence effect: it was high time
to guard against it.


---page break---


Identifier: | JB/079/106/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 79.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

079

Main Headings

Folio number

106

Info in main headings field

Image

002

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[gr with crown motif] [lion with vryheyt motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

25548

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in